Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles) -- Thread 161
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/10/2001 10:57:30 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Threads 1-50 Threads 51-100 Threads 101-150
Thread 151 Thread 152 Thread 153 Thread 154 Thread 155 Thread 156 Thread 157
Thread 158 Thread 159

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles) -- Thread 160


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-199 next last
To: SoothingDave
Private interpretation has yet to much enter into it.

Who said that ... Yoda?

121 posted on 10/11/2001 6:37:08 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Allthe Bishops and the Pope. Really?

Are you suggesting the Pope, by himself can't make an "infallible" pronouncement?. He requires the aggregate of all the Bishops??????

The charism of infalliblilty rests on the Pope alone. He does not act, as Protestants like you seem to think, as a despot, as a radical raving monarch, a sole inventor of doctrine.

The Pope certainly could define a doctrine without the consultation and consent of the bulk of the bishops. But this is not how things work in practice. The Pope solemnly defines beliefs that are already believed by the bishops and the faithful.

SD

122 posted on 10/11/2001 6:47:40 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
O.K. Why don't we just call them (Protestants) Holy Catholic?

Because their beliefs are largely not universal. You would be hard pressed to find folks who believe like the average American fundamentalist in most of the countries of the world. (You certainly won't find "KJV only" types there.) In contrast the Catholic Church is truly universal, professing one faith to all of the world's peoples.

By what authority do you "develop" the definition of any group of Christians?

I don't generally "develop" definitions. I use the ones commonly used in the world. Like in the Air Force they had a definition of someone who was a Christian and not Catholic or Orthodox. A big "P" went on your dog tags. That is the way the world regards Christianity. I didn't "develop" it, I just don't struggle against it.

SD

123 posted on 10/11/2001 6:53:33 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
From dictionary.com: base·ball (bsbôl) n. A game played with a bat and ball by two opposing teams of nine players, each team playing alternately in the field and at bat, the players at bat having to run a course of four bases laid out in a diamond pattern in order to score.

Hey, I thought we agreed not to use dictionary definitions? ;o)

I've always been a National League fan myself, and was happy when the Brewers moved over. I used to be a Brewers fan back in the '80s and early '90s, but so many years of futility have effectively left me without a team to root for. I mean, what's the point if they don't even have a chance to be competitive? I'd root for the Cardinals, because they are from the Central division, but I still hold a grudge against them for beating the Brewers in the 1982 World Series. I hate Atlanta (the worst World Series in recent memory was between the Braves and the Yankees. How could anyone outside New York or Atlanta root for either of them to win?). Houston can't win a playoff game. Arizona has no history. Since I love the makeup of the NL Central (old teams like the Cubs, Reds, Cardinals and Pirates--not to mention some competitive balance), I guess I'll try to set aside old grudges and root for St. Louis.

My 3 1/2 year old son is a Yankees fan, and has been since he first watched a World Series game with me two years ago. He has a Derek Jeter poster in his room, and can name several of the starting players and their positions.

124 posted on 10/11/2001 6:53:59 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: the808bass
there was never a chance that Jesus would sin because it was not his nature

Any Catholics wanna straighten Pelayo out? Or are ya gonna let em twist?

Bass, this is a very difficult subject because it strikes at the heart of a mystery. We profess Jesus as one person, a union of two natures, human and divine. But we can not fully grasp what this means and these types of controversies are as complicated and convoluted as the free will/determininsm ones.

What Pelayo is emphasising is the divine part of Jesus. If Jesus was God, then there is no way that God could sin, do harm. That is true.

What the others are emphasising is the human part of Jesus, especially how He serves as a role model for us. Havoc almost sounds Pelagian or Jewish in his insistance that Jesus did not "use" his divinity, but rather only his humanity. Proving that we can, by following the will of God, be sinless. If this were strictly true, then the Jews are right.

Others are also focused on the human nature of Jesus in that he faced temptation and avoided sin, he stood up to the same dangers we face every day and did the right thing. If Jesus was not human like us then the Incarnation was a "magic trick" and not real. Jesus must have been able to be really tempted AND have a free choice to sin or not. This is true.

How do we reconcile the fact that Jesus, as human, must have been able to sin with the fact that Jesus, as God, could not have possibly actually sinned? I don't know. I don't know if we can explain it.

SD

125 posted on 10/11/2001 7:18:59 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Proving that we can, by following the will of God, be sinless. If this were strictly true, then the Jews are right.

Thanks, SD! ;o)

I noticed this in Havoc's reply last night, and was wondering if anyone else would pick up on it.

126 posted on 10/11/2001 7:25:04 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: angelo
I used to be a Brewers fan back in the '80s and early '90s, but so many years of futility have effectively left me without a team to root for. I mean, what's the point if they don't even have a chance to be competitive?

Replace "Brewers" with "Pirates" and ditto. I did go once this year to check out the new park, but once that wears off...

I hate Atlanta (the worst World Series in recent memory was between the Braves and the Yankees. How could anyone outside New York or Atlanta root for either of them to win?).

Before the current era I used to quip in situations like that that I was "rooting for an earthquake." Hey, it happened once!

SD

127 posted on 10/11/2001 7:28:29 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: angelo
My 3 1/2 year old son is a Yankees fan, and has been since he first watched a World Series game with me two years ago. He has a Derek Jeter poster in his room, and can name several of the starting players and their positions.

You should be ashamed of yourself. I thought you were a better parent that that. :-)

128 posted on 10/11/2001 7:29:58 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Before the current era I used to quip in situations like that that I was "rooting for an earthquake." Hey, it happened once!

LOL! They could also just cancel the World Series. That happened once, too!

129 posted on 10/11/2001 7:32:10 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Private interpretation has yet to much enter into it.

Who said that ... Yoda?

Yoda would have said something like "Into it yet much has entered private interpretation"

It was the addressed person, Havoc

SD

130 posted on 10/11/2001 7:36:37 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Do you have anything to offer in here other than your drive-by Bible Code discoveries? Has God made you the Bible Code monitor?
131 posted on 10/11/2001 7:36:50 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Chapter and verse please</> describing the exact procedure for Christian baptism and dislinking a child from his parental authority. If a parent can require a child to get a vaccination, then will that be less effective because the child cannot formally assent?

No chapter and verse? That's what I thought.

132 posted on 10/11/2001 7:39:35 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Steven
You should be ashamed of yourself. I thought you were a better parent that that. :-)

LOL!

I'd actually like this group of Yankees if they were a National League team, or if the AL dropped the DH. I have a lot of respect for Torre and Cashman, and the way they run the team. Even Steinbrenner has become more acceptable in recent years. I appreciate that he has been unwilling to offer blockbuster A-Rod type contracts. They have been an all-around solid baseball club. They've won on teamwork, not just hitting the long ball. They are consummate professionals. You never hear of the type of nonsense with the Yankees that you do with the Mets for example; Torre wouldn't allow it. I do think they are on the decline right now, and I don't expect them to make it to the World Series this year.

133 posted on 10/11/2001 7:42:49 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: hopefulpilgrim
Would it then become "sola magic sternuma"?

Now that was very good.

134 posted on 10/11/2001 7:43:53 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: angelo
Yes.

How do you know the OT is divinely inspired?

Becky

135 posted on 10/11/2001 8:01:28 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
What about 2 Tim.2:23? What do you consider a foolish question?

Becky

136 posted on 10/11/2001 8:04:49 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Quote of the week:

Private interpretation has yet to much enter into it.

This should be fun, if we can't legitimately attack his theology, we'll attack his sentence structure and then we can advance to his spelling.

This can open a whole new world in debating huh? :-)

137 posted on 10/11/2001 8:08:46 AM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
This should be fun, if we can't legitimately attack his theology, we'll attack his sentence structure and then we can advance to his spelling.

I think you've misunderstood, Jim. I was in no way mocking his word choice or grammar. I reserve that only for the drive-by nitwits.

What I found profound in the statement is the sense of inspiration found by Havoc. This entire thread has been about nothing more than "private interpretation," yet he can't see it.

SD

138 posted on 10/11/2001 8:18:14 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
You should have put a barf alert at the start of this post! Give me a break on what a wonderful faithful person Dave is, (no offence Dave), there have been numerous people on these threads who have shown as much faith in God as Dave. There have also been NON-CATHOLICS who have been KINDER then Dave. As far as my comments and asking questions, I have problems whith people questioning the BIBLE. If the bible answers a question that should be the end of the discussion. Now when it comes to questioning man made documents that is a differnt story. If something is stated by a pope it is still man made, and if it can't be backed up with scripture it is even more suspect. My point was quesitoning the bible when the bible gives a clear answer. Get the chip off your shoulder, it was not directed at just catholics.

Becky

139 posted on 10/11/2001 8:18:44 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
The role of the pope is analogous to that of an old English king, who did not MAKE law, but simply pronounced what the law WAS and HAD BEEN since time immemorial. We live in a world in which legislatures produce new laws like sausages, but that is not how the ancients did or the Catholic Church does things.
140 posted on 10/11/2001 8:32:29 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson