Posted on 09/29/2001 9:05:06 PM PDT by Jean S
Spend a few hours on a computer search and you get some idea of how the American campus is reacting to the current crisis. It isn't pretty. The first thing you notice is that vigils and rallies tend to focus on feelings. Nothing wrong with that, I suppose. We all have to get our bearings. But the concern with emotions and personal dislocation seems over the top, as if we need to look inward for therapy more than outward to come together for the fight ahead. An anthropologist at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill said she was pleased that her students' "thoughtful, passionate varieties of anger are openings to reflection, learning."
Worse, the words the rest of the nation is using–"attack," "terrorism," "resolve," and "defense"–don't seem to come up much on campus. Umpteen college presidents put out timid statements about coping with "the tragedy," and "the events of September 11" as if we have just suffered an earthquake or some other passing natural disaster.
The American Association of University Professors released a statement that probably would have made Neville Chamberlain throw up. It promised to "continue to fight violence with renewed dedication to the exercise of freedom of thought and the expression of that freedom in our teaching." What does that mean? That the people on campus in 1941 should have responded to Pearl Harbor by giving longer lectures? Bradford Wilson of the National Association of Scholars, a group that has been struggling to restore intellectual integrity to the campus, called the AAUP statement "fatuous nonsense," "Marxist claptrap," and "anti-American in its basic thrust."
Unreal. The campus flight from reality takes many exotic forms. One is the notion that the terrorists' target wasn't really America. "Students in my classes really see this as an assault on international trade, globalization," said the dean of Columbia University's international affairs school. Another is the attempt to adapt the crisis to the campus fixation on bias crimes. The most animated rally at the University of California-Berkeley was a protest against a campus newspaper for an editorial cartoon showing two Muslim suicide bombers in hell. Many students feel that singling out members of any religious or ethnic group as responsible for the attack is a sort of hate crime. The attack "was done by . . . people who hate," said one University of Wisconsin student, "and I don't think hate has a color or ethnicity."
But the dominant campus notions were ones the terrorists themselves would surely endorse: that America had it coming, and fighting back would be vengeful, unworthy, and a risk to the lives of innocents. A speaker at a University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill teach-in called for an apology to "the tortured and the impoverished and all the millions of other victims of American imperialism." Georgetown University is holding a debate titled "Resolved: America's Policies and Past Actions Invited the Recent Attacks." At a Yale panel, six hand-wringing professors focused on "underlying causes" of the attack and America's many faults, including our "offensive cultural messages." In response, classics professor Donald Kagan said the panelists seemed intent on "blaming the victim" and asked why Yale couldn't find one panelist somewhere to focus on the enemy and "how to stamp out such evil."
Some students show a glimmer of awareness that the campus is a bubble of unreality. A Columbia student said: "A lot of people here think it would be a travesty to begin killing people. . . . go off campus you hear something else." On other campuses students resist the antiwar tilt in large numbers. At the mostly blue-collar California State University-Fresno, says Victor Hanson, who teaches there, "Maybe 90 percent of the faculty sympathizes with boutique anti-Americanism, and 90 percent of students are firmly behind the goverment, with the strongest support coming from the Mexican-American kids. The students understand what the faculty doesn't–that fostering humanity means stopping people who kill."
America still doesn't understand what has happened to its colleges. A campus culture has arisen around very dangerous ideas. Among them are radical cultural relativism, nonjudgmentalism, and a postmodern conviction that there are no moral norms or truths worth defending–all knowledge and morality are constructions built by the powerful. Add to this the knee-jerk antagonism to the "hegemony" of the West and a reflexive feeling of sympathy for anti-Western resentments, even those expressed in violence. This is a toxic mix, and it is now crucial for those both on and off the campus to start saying so.
LOL. I'm not sure that will do us much good.
LOL. I'm not sure that will do us much good.
There's always a task for the useful idiot.
To clear the mines.
it's far from over, and i don't want to have them over for tea and crumpets, but i also don't want to kill thier children.
and, here's a newsflash, america and the world in general does have a disease, it's called hate and feelings of superiority over those who are different than you are. from that we need to heal and if we don't we will bring about our own destruction and for what, differing views?
- a college student
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, don't you think nuclear bombs, killing in the name of god,ideas of superiority and hate itself is a little more dangerous than toleration and understanding by students on campuses across the country? or maybe these pasive and non violent practices threaten you and the completely subjective reality in which YOU live in some way, maybe they threaten your "values and morals" that you want to push onto people who don't want them cause they already have thier own. the times, they are a changin-bd -a 23 year old college student @ -school deleted-
Here was my response:
I live in a completely subjective reality? You are an idiot. At least have the balls to post this crap publicly so that everyone can see the campus mentality of today. Two of the reasons I survived brainwashing at UNC was that I was a math/physics major and, when not studying serious material, I was having to much fun to actually attend the social "science" electives.
Although I doubt your mushy mind can handle it, I'll try to address the subject of the thread. Do you really think we are talking about "tolerance and understanding"? Am I supposed to tolerate the attack on the WTC? Am I supposed to understand why Osama Bin Laden wants to kill me, my friends, and my family? What we are talking about is the lack of tolerance and understanding for non-leftist ideas and thoughts within the walls of these universities. I know a conservative professor who objectively and conscientiously taught the political theory of Marx and Engels? Do you think any of the liberals taught Burke or Hayek?
I don't know about my "values and morals" being threatened and in need of protection? I do know that my family and friends LIVES are threatened? If push comes to shove, you probably don't want to be around when I protect them.
I actually thought about starting a thread on it. Maybe we should??
Roy P. Benavidez bump.
Thanks for that link about Benavidez
I had never heard about him till I read that thread!
True Americans don't stop and say " what race, what ethnicity, democrat or republican?"
We fight for each other and we value our FREEDOM above any "feel good" causes.....
and I hope there are men who can try and match this man!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.