Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Bill Clinton Responsible for September 11?
FrontPageMag.com ^ | September 20, 2001 | John Perazzo

Posted on 09/20/2001 11:24:03 AM PDT by Radioheart

Is Bill Clinton Responsible for September 11?
By John Perazzo
Bill Clinton’s policies left America vulnerable, and set the stage for last week’s attacks. continue…


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2001 11:24:03 AM PDT by Radioheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
Is Bill Clinton Responsible for September 11?

No, he is not. The terrorists are responsible. Clinton is responsible for creating a poor security environment that made the raids possible by making stupid rules for intelligence agencies, promoting disarmed environments such as planes and schools, sticking his nose in everyone else's business while not attending to ours, and first and foremost creating such an atmosphere of distrust against government that folks were suspicious of ANY attempt of his to promote security.

2 posted on 09/20/2001 11:30:16 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hidy
http://www.frontpagemag.com/columnists/perazzo/jp09-20-01.htm

Cut and paste, or click the link. Your prattle will not work any more.

3 posted on 09/20/2001 11:31:39 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
Does the bear poop in the woods? Is the Pope a Catholic? Thanks to Billy Blythe for dismantling our security and intelligence apparatus. He's a traitor.
4 posted on 09/20/2001 11:31:50 AM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Here's a hyperlink, for ease of transport.
5 posted on 09/20/2001 11:36:24 AM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A $3 Bill is worthless...
What better way to define the phrase "rhetorical question"?
6 posted on 09/20/2001 11:38:06 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
What keeps knawing at me is the John Huang visits to the Riady offices from the Commerce Dept, with classified info. I just have this unconfirmed feeling that this anti-american org is larger and has infiltrated much deeper than we know. Why did Riady need Huang in the commerce? Why did he tell Clinton to get him in? Frankly, I think that if people want to arget people for a backlash they should start at the DNC not a Mosque.
7 posted on 09/20/2001 11:39:30 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Hidy?

The "prarie dog" dissenter/disruptor? Pops up then disappears for a while? S/he seems to be everywhere today- guess her little god The Nameless One is taking too many hits....

8 posted on 09/20/2001 11:39:41 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I used the one in the first one. But I don't think Hidy's got the guts to even admit that she's dead wrong on this. We need the CIA, and to be very honest, I will say we need people like Ollie North in the CIA. We need people who will do what it takes to keep our people safe from hostile foreign interests, both state-sponsored and private-sector.
9 posted on 09/20/2001 11:41:28 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
No, the terrorists are responsible and they will die for it. Clinton is responsible for dereliction of duty while POTUS and that will be his legacy.
10 posted on 09/20/2001 11:42:22 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Dont you find it strange that Clinton was in Australia Sept 11? Didnt he meet with Riadys on occasion there?
11 posted on 09/20/2001 11:46:40 AM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

In short, our president placed his preoccupation with his own public image above the safety of the entire world, and was content to saddle future administrations with the disastrous outgrowths of his own self-absorbed gutlessness.

This says it all.

12 posted on 09/20/2001 11:53:12 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
It's just too bad that he came back! I guess the Aussies didn't want him either.
P.S. Clinton is as responsible for these attacks as the terriorists themselves. I hope before I die, I get to see them execute him for treason (and his ugly wife too).
13 posted on 09/20/2001 11:57:49 AM PDT by Lucky2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
As O'Reilly said, the primary function of the federal gummint is to protect the people. If it can't do that, why do we need it?
14 posted on 09/20/2001 11:57:51 AM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Why'd you have to go and invite her to this thread?
15 posted on 09/20/2001 11:58:04 AM PDT by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
bump
16 posted on 09/20/2001 11:59:38 AM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart
Bill Clinton is responsible to the degree that Neville Chamberlain was responsible for appeasing Hitler instead of striking back early.

Hitler is known historically as the monster, but Chamberlain is universally despised for being the enabler.

17 posted on 09/20/2001 11:59:40 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb
Call it payback for her and her ilk blaming Bush. Or, say it's because I'm sick of their head-in-the-sand approach to the way things are in the world. Or, perhaps I'm sick of her hate speech against the CIA and other insitutions that DO have a place in the federal budget as opposed to other programs that are ineffective and/or unnecessary.

Besides, as I said earlier, I don't think she's got the guts to show up and do anything beyond a hit-and-run. She just wants to bash the CIA, Bush, and anyone else who is not "progressive." She doesn't have the stomach for an honest debate.

18 posted on 09/20/2001 12:02:59 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
I heard a report last week when they were looking for Satan Laden that he possibly could be in Indonesia where the Muslim radicals were getting a foothold, with SL's help. There are just tooooo many coincidences in this. But, there may be a possibility that when the you know what hits the fan some of the not so committed might begin to talk.
19 posted on 09/20/2001 12:08:27 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Radioheart, I am still Casey, Kahonek, Liberty Belle
Is Bill Clinton Responsible for September 11?

No, we as a nation are responsible.

Hang on a minute now, and listen.

The terrorists were just being terrorists, doing what comes natural. They had jobs to do--killing Americans and restricting American freedom--and they did those jobs very well.

We as American citizens have an important job too--defending America and preserving American freedom--that we have been practically ignoring for decades.

Americans died on September 11th not because people in this country have too many freedoms, but because we have too few.

For example, we do not have the freedom not to spend our money on foreign aid to enemies of terrorists. The government extorts our money from us and spends it on whatever foreign aid it chooses, without Constitutional authority and without asking our permission. In a Constitutional America, all foreign aid would come from private foundations that would be voluntarily funded by people who wanted to give money to a foreign government. Only the people who funded the foundations pumping money into Israel would be targeted by terrorists, not Americans in general. (I would certainly and enthusiastically be one of those people: but it is unjust to force that responsibility upon people who haven't willingly contracted for it.)

As another example, we do not have the freedom to equip ourselves defend our lives and those of others while we're on airliners--and airline companies don't even have the freedom to give us that freedom.

Americans died on September 11th not because people in this country have too many freedoms, but because we have too few.

Who took those freedoms away? The US government did.

But who let the government take those freedoms away? We did. It is not the government's job to protect the freedoms of Americans. Just like every other government, it is our government's job to take away those freedoms and grow ever larger and more powerful. If those freedoms are to be protected, they must be protected by us, and no one other than us.

So September 11th, when Americans came under attack and had no freedom to prevent the attack, was the culmination of a job very well done by terrorists. It was also the culmination of a job very well done by the government--including Bill Clinton. The only folks who have not been doing a good job, who have been ignoring their responsibilities, who have been shirking their duty--are us. And from the looks of our lukewarm reactions to indications that the government is going to use this crisis to become much more streamlined and efficient at its job...we're continuing to do nothing.

If we had been doing our job preventing the terrorists and the government from doing theirs, then on September 11th at most 19 people would have had to die, and very few feathers would have been ruffled. But because we haven't been doing our job, now the government has to go kill a lot more than 19 people, and most of the Islamic world is going to hate us even more murderously.

No, Bill Clinton is not responsible for September 11th. He was a dishonest, corrupt, contemptible criminal, but he was just doing what came naturally to him. We were the ones who elected him and put him in a place where doing what came naturally could hurt us, and then permitted our representatives to refuse to remove him from it.

20 posted on 09/20/2001 12:34:16 PM PDT by Barak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson