Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEC. OF DEFENSE DOES NOT RULE OUT NUKES AS LAST RESORT
US News via DRUDGE ^ | Sun Sep 16 2001 14:03:41 ET | Editorial Staff

Posted on 09/16/2001 5:00:13 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
No surprises here.
1 posted on 09/16/2001 5:00:13 PM PDT by vannrox (MyEMail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Better to use them as a first resort and get this thing over with, pronto. Nuke the terror camps, then issue a 12-hour ultimatum to the Taliban to surrender bin Laden, and civil authority, to our occupation commander, or they get the same treatment. Can anybody see this not working?
2 posted on 09/16/2001 5:07:35 PM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
FYI-- pass this on!


Couple of Good Nuclear War Survival Primers...

Couple Good Nuclear War Survival Primers...

You Will Survive Doomsday (Eye-Opening Myth Buster!)

11 Steps to Nuclear War Survival (From Canadian version of FEMA)

Nuclear War Survival Skills (280 pg 'how-to' book on-line!)

Trans-Pacific Fallout (Don't be caught off-guard by these ill winds!)

Nuclear War Unthinkable? (Russian & Chinese Preps!)

...and...

Bruce Beach's Nuclear Survival Ark II Site

This last was recently updated and also includes FEMA Nuclear Weapon Target Maps by state along with survival info and groups specific for each! Enjoy!

Shane Connor, author of...
Potassium Iodide Anti-Radiation Pill FAQ


And:

-Index of Nuke articles--

3 posted on 09/16/2001 5:08:04 PM PDT by backhoe (Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel *safer* yet? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
They're forgetting the NUKE trump card: The Neutron Bomb. No drifting radiation, can move into the area in 48 hrs, and won't destroy buildings or plants...only flesh. My father-in-law is a nuclear physiscist who knows Stephen Hawking personally. He says that one of the original designers of the first A-bomb is still around: TELLER. That guy also helped to create the neutron weapon and could make it even bigger. THAT'S the way to go!
4 posted on 09/16/2001 5:08:34 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Formerly GunsUp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I doubt nukes will be used to go after bin Laden for the simple reason that his death would not be verifiable with certainty. Once we have bin Laden, I think it is conceivable, but unlikely, that tactical nukes will be used in other contexts.
5 posted on 09/16/2001 5:08:56 PM PDT by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
If I remember correctly, Teller may have participated in the development of the A-bomb(fission), but he is better known as the father of the H-bomb (fusion).
6 posted on 09/16/2001 5:11:20 PM PDT by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
I wouldn't rule them out, either, but I'd go to extreme lengths not to use them.
8 posted on 09/16/2001 5:13:38 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I don't think there's much chance of using nukes, unless this thing gets out of control and somebody identifiable nukes us first.

However, it's smart to leave the threat out there for our enemies to think about.

9 posted on 09/16/2001 5:27:29 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Teller did far more than work on the A-bomb... he designed the hydrogen bomb.
10 posted on 09/16/2001 5:31:33 PM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
US State Department Sponsors Training of Would-Be Terrorists
11 posted on 09/16/2001 5:32:40 PM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
I remember the Neutron bomb theory but I never thought we built it. Maybe we might find out now for sure, eh?
12 posted on 09/16/2001 5:34:56 PM PDT by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
but added that it would not be a "serious option".

On the contrary....it would be a most serious option.

13 posted on 09/16/2001 5:34:58 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Hey Osama, duck and cover.
14 posted on 09/16/2001 5:35:04 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
Maybe we might find out now for sure, eh?

Within weeks, I imagine.

15 posted on 09/16/2001 5:36:20 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
For nearly 60 years we had a (relatively) peaceful world because (partly) we had active memory of Hiroshima & Nagasaki! NO ONE who saw that horror wished to see it again--especially visited on their countrymen!

The SH+T-for-BRAINS involved in our current conflict NEVER SAW--& have little reason to fear "The Old Man in the Cocked Hat!"

These evil slugs must learn to fear us; 'better we do it now, & STOP them, or wait, & STILL have to scare them!

We must make them fear us FAR MORE than we might fear them. Sadly, we must destroy what they value most in a manner that forever terrifies them--or we can NEVER be "rid of them!" Any lesser action will only be regarded as a sign of "weakness & decadence" by these psychopaths!

Doc

16 posted on 09/16/2001 5:36:24 PM PDT by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I think we should refer to him as Osama Bin Had.
17 posted on 09/16/2001 5:37:33 PM PDT by joey'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Of course he won't! The Sec of Defense just read the riot act to the press, gov't officials, and all Americans that "Loose lips sink ships." Why do you think he would divulge what weapons he will or won't use. Besides, the psych game is now on, so misleading the enemy is the name of the game. The Press become the useful idiots of the military as in the Persian Gulf War I.
18 posted on 09/16/2001 5:40:21 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joey'smom
"I think we should refer to him as Osama Bin Had."

And his butt-buddy, Clinton, as Osama Bin Blown.

19 posted on 09/16/2001 5:42:47 PM PDT by JRadcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Nor should he. The message should be clear. There are no limits to the horror we can unleash upon our enemies. It is a very bad choice to make to choose to be our enemy. Our friends live longer.
20 posted on 09/16/2001 5:43:04 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson