Skip to comments.
MASSIVE Attack of Afghanistan Being Planned
Guardian ^
| Sept. 13, 2002
Posted on 09/12/2001 7:34:44 PM PDT by dennis1x
bunker down...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
1
posted on
09/12/2001 7:34:44 PM PDT
by
dennis1x
To: dennis1x
Moi bunker down??? I suggest the Taliban bunker down and prepare to be buried if this is true. About time. Adios you scumbags.
2
posted on
09/12/2001 7:40:21 PM PDT
by
cajungirl
To: dennis1x
Don't Pakistan and India need a nuke testing area?
3
posted on
09/12/2001 7:40:50 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: mr. powell
Can we please hit 'em when it is daylight there? I would like to see the pictures live also if possible. That is not too much to ask.
4
posted on
09/12/2001 7:50:16 PM PDT
by
ehat
To: dennis1x
How much damage can we do to this country? They've been at war for over 20 years?
I suggest spinup the nukes.
And while we're at, let's take out Mecca.
5
posted on
09/12/2001 7:52:14 PM PDT
by
Taylor42
To: TheDon
Pakistan supports the Taliban, who see themselves not as part of a distinctive Afgan state so much as a cornerstone of pan-Islamic alliance. In fact the main opposition group in Afghanistan are fighting to preserve a distinctively Afgan state. As for Pakistan, it's in an arms race with India, where nationalists recently took control through elections. India detonated nuclear devices and Pakistan followed along, but the devices were small and they have no effective delivery vehicles -- ie these were tests to save face and preserve national pride but they weren't part of on ongoing and successful program in the development of a credible nuclear threat. Maybe before you float breezy suggestions about nuclear war you might want to check up on some basic facts.
To: ConsistentLibertarian
I think they announced a little while ago that Pakistan is "on board" with the US.
To: dennis1x
Full article on
this thread The Chinese communist media announced that Jiang Zemin and Bush talked on the phone. This news was from the communists. They spun it saying China was ready to join the US and fight terrosim through UN cooperation.
But I think this conversation must have been related to Afghanistan action that is planned.
Also, Bush had better have told Jiang that any more help to Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya and other regimes allied with this form of terrorism would be unacceptable.
China's help for Pakistan's nukes has already come in to play big time given the military operation that will take place in Afghanistan.
China is peripherally allied with this new axis and they must decide whose side they are on now.
This goes for every nation.
8
posted on
09/12/2001 7:57:24 PM PDT
by
tallhappy
To: Aggie Mama
I think they announced a little while ago that Pakistan is "on board" with the US.EVERYONE is on board this ship... last one out of the water gets a really nasty response.
I bet bin Laden would say he's on board if he could pull it off like a Clinton.
To: Aggie Mama
The Taliban are "on board" if you're willing to take announcements at face value. On of the foreign ministers said that if the US can provide evidence of Bin Laden's involvment they were proceed to extradite him.
To: ehat
Being a Libertarian, and strongly in favor of free enterprise, I really think this should be a Pay-Per-View event...
11
posted on
09/12/2001 8:02:38 PM PDT
by
airforce
To: dennis1x
This is the wrong place. These people are busy killing each other. The culprits are in Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Sudan, Libya. These folk are barely out of the stone age. They could not even have planned this.
12
posted on
09/12/2001 8:03:03 PM PDT
by
gore3000
To: dennis1x
You forgot to post the text of the article and to indicate you retitled it.
13
posted on
09/12/2001 8:05:55 PM PDT
by
ironman
To: Taylor42
You nuke Mecca I think the entire Muslim world would crumple and crash. Just like one of the World Trade Towers. The end of their mad intifadas and Jihads. These Islamic goofballs are quite superstitious and by definition easily spooked
14
posted on
09/12/2001 8:06:03 PM PDT
by
dennisw
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: dennis1x
Good idea: Pak & India can both test their nukes.
Iraq needs testing too:
Nukes might not work in Iraq, because of he different climate & soils:
BETTER test there, too.
(Just kidding Saddam.)
To: dennis1x
On the bright side, this should end their terrible civil war going on there now.
To: Teacher317
He says he wasn't involved, but he's pleased with the outcome anyways. Depending on what the meaning of "involved" is, he might even be telling the truth. He knows his communications are being monitorered and the Taliban claim that he's not being allowed to operate freely. Operating in loose cells with minimal exchange of information between them is their best bet. It makes it harder to compromise the organization. Maybe Omar provides money and loose direction and cells freelance. Before someone goes balistic, I'm not arguing for diminished responsibility. Just pointing out that, if it's a question about command and control, it would be niave to think it's all originating from a single source.
To: BunnySlippers
CNN has a reporter in Kabul -- you should get a live shot __ VERY briefly.... maybe just white light.
19
posted on
09/12/2001 8:08:52 PM PDT
by
Naspino
To: BunnySlippers
They all hate us anyhow, so lets drop the big one now.
20
posted on
09/12/2001 8:09:18 PM PDT
by
appeal2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson