Posted on 09/06/2001 8:48:08 PM PDT by rmlew
To Whom it may concern,
Al Sharpton will be the Columbia Political Union speaker for the Columbia College Student Council Re-orientation event on Sunday September 9th from 5 p.m. -7 p.m. in Roone Arledge Auditorium, Alfred Lerner Hall
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ccsc/events.html
Because of Reverend Sharpton's history of racial incitement, he is an unsuitable speaker and will set back race relations at Columbia. The tacit endorsement by the Columbia Political Union and Columbia College Student Council for Sharpton institutionalizes a soft-bias against Jews and all whites. As the first speaker of the year, Sharpton will be setting a tone of mistrust divisiveness for the entire year.
I believe that this situation merits both a response and a protest.
The Columbia College Conservative Club will be holding a protest from 4:30-7PM on Sunday outside of Alfred Lerner Hall (115th and Broadway).
Below is my response the Sharpton speaking and the internal announcement for the event within the CPU.
Sincerely,
Ron Lewenberg,
President, Columbia College Conservative Club
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/conservative
PS. There should be coverage from the New York Post. Bring your friends.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 17:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ron Maximilian Lewenberg
To: Yoni Appelbaum
Subject: Re: [Fwd: VERY IMPORTANT - READ IMMED.]
Yoni,
I have many problems with Al Sharpton being the CCSC re-orientation speaker. I understand, respect, and endorse the CPU policy of inviting speakers of all stripes. The reverend is a significant political leader and is worth having as a speaker at some point. Re-orientation is supposed to bring the community together. It is not the appropriate venue for Reverend Sharpton.
He is not just a racist demagogue and rabble-rouser. Sharpton is a race-baiter who has incited two riots, which ended in murder. 10 years ago he was instrumental in inflaming tensions around the accidental death of Gavin Cato. This lead to a riot, if not a pogrom, and the brutal murder of Yankel Rosenbaum. Far from being chastened, Sharpton continued his racial demagoguery. After the jury acquitted Limerick Nelson, who was later found guilty in a federal civil-rights trial, Sharpton congratulated the killer of Mr. Rosenbaum. 5 years later, Sharpton led a series of protests and boycotts against non-black businesses in Harlem ending with the murderous rampage at Freddy's on 125th street in 1995. Sharpton called the owners of Freddy's "White interlopers" and "Jewish blood-suckers." Sharpton also helped orchestrate and perpetuate a racially divisive fraud in the Tawana Brawley case, which threatened to tear the city apart.
Reverend Al Sharpton, a Black David Duke, is totally unsuitable as the CPU speaker at CCSC Reorientation. It would only divide the community and promote racial hatred, if not actual violence. Having Sharpton speak at Re-orientation would reflect poorly on the CPU, the university, and the community. I strongly urge you to reconsider. The issue is not free speech. Sharpton can and should speak. Re-orientation is not the proper venue for Reverend Sharpton.
Ron Lewenberg,
CCCC
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Yoni Appelbaum {General Manager, CPU} wrote:
> As per this e-mail, we have invited the Rev. Al Sharpton to speak at
> Columbia. If any member of the Board has a problem with this invitation,
> please contact me directly, as soon as possible. > I don't agree with his politics, and I have serious questions regarding
> his credibility, his unsubstantiated attacks on people who have been
> proven to be innocent of any crime, and statements of his that could be
> construed as racist or anti-Semitic. Nevertheless, it has been the CPU's
> policy to invite political speakers of all stripes to this campus, and
> to let the student body decide for themselves. I expect all of you will
> agree with me that Al Sharpton is a significant force in the New York
> political world, and that he will draw students into political debate.
> For those of you who, like me, have questions about his politics or
> positions, I suspect that there is no better way to raise those
> questions than to bring him to campus.
> We will, as always, be happy to work with any student groups who wish to
> protest the event to ensure that they are given a space in which to do
> so that both provides them with the requisite visibility, and meets the
> security and logistical needs of the event. >
> Yoni Appelbaum
> General Manager
They invite a guy from StormFront, they've killed fewer people than Al Sharpton (2).
Unfortunately, they do. As I'm against repression, I think the thing to do is to have two groups. One group, inside, sitting in the center of the auditorium or sprinkled throughout, would rise, at the beginning of Sharpton's speech, turn, and march out. The second group, outside, would wave placards with sayings like, "Rev. Race Hoax," "Tawana Lied," "Rev. Lynch Mob," "Remember the Dead of Freddie's," and "Racist Interloper!" They could also shout, "No justice, no peace!"
Seriously, if you are in the NYC area, please drop by. We need the numbers and signs.
Close your tags.
My response to this is: Why?
At most, the maunderings of this guy is worth 2 column inches of ink in Section Z every 5 years. FReegards,
Earlier this year, Sharpton spoke at my workplace. I work at a Federal agency, and Sharpton was invited by the union to give a lunchtime talk. I organized a small protest. A few people thanked me for what I was doing. I had a few people scream at me, a few people who crumpled up my leaflets, but I didn't have a single person who contradicted me on the facts.
Oooh, great idea, mrustow. Pointed and eloquent, with marked contrast to the standard leftist tactic of having beared, self absorbed and self righteous liberals attempt to shout down the speaker (or throw fruit).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.