Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Great Mistakes and Great Men
Sobran's ^ | August 23, 2001 | Joseph Sobran

Posted on 09/06/2001 2:09:10 PM PDT by sheltonmac

Great Mistakes and Great Men

August 23, 2001

Some years ago a Catholic historian took stock of the Second Vatican Council, held in the early Sixties. He noted that the condition of the Church since the Council had far surpassed the darkest predictions and worst fears of the reactionaries.

“Prophets of doom” are commonly held in derision, but they are often right. In fact they sometimes understate the worst possibilities, and events show not that they were correct, but that history held grim surprises even for those who were trying to imagine what could go wrong. Time may make a Cassandra look like a cockeyed optimist.

Opponents of the U.S. Constitution feared that it would result in big government. They couldn’t dream how big the federal government would actually become, far exceeding in size, scope, and power what had been called the “tyranny” of George III. Nor did they foresee such collateral results as the Civil War and U.S. involvement in two world wars.

If those pessimists said to us now, “Well, we tried to warn you,” defenders of the Constitution might reply that these things happened because the Constitution was abandoned or perverted. The pessimists might fairly argue: “But you said it was a foolproof plan! You said its built-in safeguards would prevent the centralization of power! Evidently you were wrong.”

Again, both sides in the Civil War expected a short contest. A few months of skirmishing, and everything would be settled. One pessimist warned that it might last three years and take tens of thousands of lives; it lasted four years and claimed 620,000 lives.

One Southern senator nearly called it right. Alexander Stephens of Georgia warned that if the South seceded, it would mean a war the South could only lose. And in that case, the North would be able to do everything the South accused it of wanting to do. He was correct. Secession backfired, bringing on the South’s worst fears — and then some.

Today the “isolationists” — the patriots who wanted the United States to stay out of World War II — are spoken of as if they were obviously wrong. But they were only wrong in failing to see just how bad the consequences of the war would be.

Japan and Germany were defeated, but they were replaced by a far more terrifying enemy: the Soviet Union, which, shortly after the war, posed a threat to this country that Japan and Germany never did. Apart from seizing ten countries in Central Europe, the Soviets acquired a nuclear arsenal with which they could annihilate American cities. Before the war, nobody had imagined this even as a remote possibility. It was our alliance with the Soviet Union that enabled its spies and sympathizers to lay their hands on American nuclear secrets.

In the Sixties, a few prescient people warned that escalating the war in Vietnam might result in a conflict as serious as the Korean War. Actually, more Americans finally died in Vietnam than in Korea.

At about the same time, Lyndon Johnson declared “war on poverty.” He pledged that if his new programs failed to “eliminate” poverty, they would be abandoned. Conservative skeptics warned that the programs wouldn’t work, which was true enough; but none foresaw how devastating the welfare system would be to the cities and black family life. Yet even when the damage was obvious, the programs proved politically hard to reverse.

One of the odd things about our mistakes is that after we commit ourselves to them, it becomes difficult even to perceive them as mistakes. We adapt to them, justify them, become dependent on them, and forget the alternatives to them, until we no longer have the mental detachment we had before we made them. They become almost impossible to disown, and we sacrifice our judgment to them.

And over time, our wrong turns are normalized and exalted as steps in the epic of progress. Anyone who proposes to correct them is given the standard homily: “We can’t turn back the clock!”

It’s amazing how seldom societies ask themselves, before making a fateful decision, some simple questions: What if this turns out to be a disastrous mistake? Will we be able to undo it?

Maybe that’s why history sometimes looks like a tragic trail of irreversible blunders, and why those who made them are commemorated as our greatest men. After all, who wants to build monuments in honor of pessimists?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2001 2:09:10 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
The language of Vatican II was not specific enough. Those who were honest thought that the predicters of doom were wrong -- that no one would ever take what they said out of context, take advantage of it, have an evil agenda, etc.

There's something to be said for fine print. :-)

The problem is the writers (of the Constitution and Vatican II documents) were too honest and so also more than just a little naive not to dot every i and cross every t.

Now we're paying for it.

2 posted on 09/06/2001 2:15:43 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
His thesis is correct, but his WWII example is more short-sighted than those he blames.
3 posted on 09/06/2001 2:16:41 PM PDT by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan, Snuffington, Greg 4TCP, Loopy, ouroboros, cva66snipe, Askel5, ppaul, kidd
.
4 posted on 09/06/2001 2:30:24 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2, sauropod, RaceBannon, GeronL, Mercuria, Ricardo4CP, sola gracia, Dawntreader, calypgin
.
5 posted on 09/06/2001 2:30:49 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benighted, WarHawk42, satadru, manumission, Rowdee, A+Bert, Uriel1975, JonathanG, Ted, AnnaZ
.
6 posted on 09/06/2001 2:31:09 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644, Okiereddust, George Frm Br00klyn Park, ServesURight, 11th Earl of Mar, tberry, MVV
.
7 posted on 09/06/2001 2:31:23 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bayourod, Keyesertarian, don-o, Uncle Sham, Jolly Rodgers, tpaine, JoeGar, t-shirt, Darth Sidious
.
8 posted on 09/06/2001 2:31:37 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logician2u, Demidog, enemy of the people, Linda Liberty, Extremely Extreme Extremist, LibertyBelt
.
9 posted on 09/06/2001 2:31:56 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rb22982, A.J.Armitage, Derville, Mike2Right, shuckmaster, skunkworks, Who is John Galt?, billbears
.
10 posted on 09/06/2001 2:32:16 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet, ReformedBeckite, OldKingCole, ashrad, c-b, jgrubbs, Eagle Eye, electron1, far rightist
.
11 posted on 09/06/2001 2:32:32 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lovecraft, another1, Fangs Of The BUSHMASTER, far rightist, truthseeker911, H.Akston, Twodees
.
12 posted on 09/06/2001 2:33:27 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
But you said it was a foolproof plan!

Never underestimate the ingenuity of fools.

Shalom.

13 posted on 09/06/2001 2:37:00 PM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
I learned only recently that Cardinal Bugnini's first version of the new Mass deleted the Roman Canon!!! Once upon a time, this would have gotten him burned at the stake. As it was, he was merely instructed to put it back in.
14 posted on 09/06/2001 2:44:05 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Philo's Law:

To learn from your mistakes, you must first realize that you are making mistakes.

15 posted on 09/06/2001 3:15:46 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Some very good observations, but I think he's wrong about the Constitution. It can be argued, and I will argue, that the Articles of Confederation would've been worse.

Contrary to what Sobran says, neither supporters nor opponents of the Constitution would've been shocked by our current predicament. Bitterly disappointed, but not shocked. They knew, and stated repeatedly, that power tends to expand and liberty tends to shrink. Since our government has overstepped the bounds of the Constitution, what makes you think they would have obeyed the Articles? Would politicians be more honorable? The Constitution, however, gave us a system of checks and balances that has slowed the progress of expanding power. Madison himself admitted it's not the best protection for liberty, though. The best protection for liberty is vigilance on the part of the people, and checks merely help vigilance out. In fact, checks and balances are one more thing we should be vigilant about protecting. We relaxed our guard, and the dishonorable successors to the Founding Fathers took advantage of it for all it was worth. That would've happened just as much under the Articles of Confederation, since human nature would be the same.

16 posted on 09/06/2001 5:05:55 PM PDT by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
If you wait long enough, anything will happen, Joe.
And interpretation can make shampoo out of  shoe leather.
We aren't impressed.
 
17 posted on 09/06/2001 6:09:33 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac CommiesOut
Japan and Germany were defeated, but they were replaced by a far more terrifying enemy: the Soviet Union.....It was our alliance with the Soviet Union that enabled its spies and sympathizers to lay their hands on American nuclear secrets.

Au contrare! It was the imbeciles in charge of our foreign policy and pro-communist butt-kissers of Stalin, this includes FDR, Eisenhower, and their cronies, who sold out this country, and all of Central and Eastern Europe to the Reds. In 1945, General George Patton warned what was to come if Eisenhower made him stop his armored advance at the Czechoslovak border. They shit-canned Patton to shut him up, by relieved him of his command, and disbanded the victorious U.S. Third Army. An Iron Curtain descended upon Europe, millions were murdered by our red "ally," and we are still suffering from the effects.

18 posted on 09/07/2001 2:38:18 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad, Ouroboros, SamAdams76
A bump to you.
19 posted on 09/07/2001 7:28:08 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
Great comments, I'm not much of a historian, but what I've seen on this FR web site I'll have to agree with you on this. I think the argument of state's rights and constitutionally were red herrings that duked people into supporting the Confederacy. I believe the majority of the Confederate leaders were idealist and had a tendency to ignore reality. Those that pay attention to reality arn't so quick to jump on the band wagon with the rest of the gang.
20 posted on 09/07/2001 7:43:16 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson