Skip to comments.
Zelensky Bends on War. Leaked Tapes Hint at a Midterm Meltdown Plan
Promethean Updates on youtube ^
| 10/22/26
| Adam Sturman, Barbara Boyd, Susan Kokinda
Posted on 10/22/2026 1:49:14 PM PDT by JayGalt
Zelensky just blinked. President Trump has been pressing Kyiv to make a deal. On Tuesday he said it plainly: "We want Zelenskyy to make a deal."
Now Zelensky is moving. On Fox News Wednesday he was asked if he'd accept freezing the war where the lines are now. "Yes, right now, we have to freeze," he said. He called it a "real way to end this war."
After meeting Steve Witkoff in Oslo, he also says Ukraine will back new three-way talks with the U.S. and Russia, likely in November.
It's not a peace deal yet. Zelensky still wants security guarantees and Europe at the table. But Trump says this may be "the closest we've been."
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloggertrash; buzzwordtsunami; cia; putinstoogery; randspam; russia; russianbotfarm; tds; ukraine; war
Message from Jim Robinson:
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
This video is an excellent overview of the causes of this conflict. The pervading narrative is debunked in the video and the motivations and agenda of the Eu, Globalists and war mongers are exposed. We live in dangerous times where amoral, authoritarian, Machiavellian individuals have created networks of organizations and narratives to destroy the Nation-state and steal our individual freedoms.
1
posted on
10/22/2026 1:49:14 PM PDT
by
JayGalt
To: JayGalt
Blah, blah, blah. I’ll don’t believe any of it.
2
posted on
10/22/2026 2:05:17 PM PDT
by
The Louiswu
(Good Luck!)
To: JayGalt
No mention of Russia. Might be kinda important to see what they think about this....
3
posted on
10/22/2026 2:14:40 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: PGR88
No mention of Russia. Might be kinda important to see what they think about this....
Right, since Putin's Russia started the war by invading its neighbor, the war will only stop when Russia is made to stop. It's not rocket science.
4
posted on
10/22/2026 2:23:57 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Dr. Franklin
Maybe you should listen to the video before commenting on the thread. The simple answer is often the one suggested by a politically invented narrative.
5
posted on
10/22/2026 2:37:01 PM PDT
by
JayGalt
(If I only possessed the virtue of conciseness...🦉)
To: JayGalt
Maybe you should listen to the video before commenting on the thread. The simple answer is often the one suggested by a politically invented narrative.
I have no need for your counterfactual propaganda.
6
posted on
10/22/2026 2:47:57 PM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: JayGalt
The pervading narrative is debunked in the video and the motivations and agenda of the Eu, Globalists and war mongers are exposed.
———————+
The pervading Western MSM narrative is debunked in the video and the motivations and agenda of the desperate Eu, Globalists and war mongers are exposed.
Ukraine has no light at the end of their tunnel. When President Trump just stated we have spent $$$$$$ 350 billion of taxpayers money for nothing in return, shows he is America First and will claw back all our taxpayers money, one way or another.
7
posted on
10/22/2026 3:01:52 PM PDT
by
delta7
To: JayGalt; All

Just in case you don't have time to watch a two hour video:
Link to ChatGPT Video Transcript Summary
Summary: Ukraine Peace Talks, Economic Policy, and U.S. Politics
Overview: The discussion examines President Donald Trump’s efforts to negotiate an end to the Russia–Ukraine war, then broadens into the hosts’ views on international finance, U.S. economic policy, the 2026 midterm elections, and allegations of political coordination against the Trump administration. The program is strongly pro-Trump and presents many disputed political interpretations as its own analysis.
1. Ukraine and prospects for a negotiated settlement
- The hosts cite Trump’s public statements that negotiations are making progress and that he does not want to jeopardize talks with Russia. They also discuss Russia’s release of imprisoned U.S. citizen Stephen Hubbard, which they describe as a gesture made at Trump’s request without a reciprocal U.S. prisoner release.
- Secretary of State Marco Rubio is quoted as arguing that U.S. assistance was essential to Ukraine’s continued existence as a sovereign state, while acknowledging the bravery of Ukrainian forces.
- In a Fox News interview, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says Ukraine could accept freezing the fighting along the current front lines as a way to stop the killing, provided it subsequently receives security guarantees from the United States and Europe.
- Guest Barbara Boyd argues that the territorial dispute over the Donbas region remains a central obstacle. She presents the conflict as rooted in the post-2014 political upheaval, the region’s Russian-speaking population, and the failure to implement the Minsk agreements. Her account places primary responsibility on Western governments and portrays Russia’s actions as a response to events in Ukraine; these are contested interpretations of the conflict.
- The hosts argue that Trump is pursuing a broader settlement rather than a temporary ceasefire. They speculate that renewed Russian energy exports through Ukraine, with revenue shared to help rebuild the country, could form part of an economic agreement.
2. A proposed change in international economic policy
- Susan Kokinda discusses Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s remarks at the International Monetary Fund. She says Bessent challenged the conventional emphasis on austerity, arguing that economic growth should be central to addressing debt and financial instability.
- The hosts criticize floating exchange rates, financial speculation, restrictions on fossil fuels, and opposition to nuclear power. They argue these policies have hindered industrial production and economic development in poorer countries.
- They portray the Trump administration as seeking a shift away from globalization toward cooperation among sovereign nation-states, particularly the United States, Russia, China, India, and Japan. They speculate that this could eventually lead to a new international monetary arrangement resembling a revised Bretton Woods system.
- The discussion also argues that renewed energy trade and industrial investment could help Europe recover from economic difficulties. These claims and predictions are presented by the speakers and are not independently established in the program.
3. Allegations of a plan to undermine the Trump administration
- Boyd and Kokinda discuss material attributed to an online researcher known as Data Republican. They allege that political nonprofits, wealthy donors, former government personnel, and current or former military officials are coordinating efforts to obstruct the Trump administration and influence the midterm elections.
- They interpret Senator Elissa Slotkin’s comments about possible investigations of a future Trump administration as evidence of an organized political strategy. They also describe alleged preparations involving governors, election officials, and former Defense Department personnel.
- The hosts suggest the alleged strategy could involve election disputes, protests, resistance to federal action, and attempts to impeach administration officials. They say public reporting has corroborated parts of the story, but the transcript does not provide enough evidence to establish the broader claims of a coordinated coup plan.
- They warn viewers about possible election-related unrest and advocate scrutiny of political funding networks. Their claims that the 2020 election was rigged, that January 6 was staged, or that a coordinated coup is underway are asserted rather than substantiated in the discussion.
4. Outreach to working-class and Black voters
- The program shows footage from a Detroit event featuring Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers, who discusses local priorities including literacy, affordable housing, food access for seniors, and high water bills.
- Kokinda argues that practical economic projects and direct engagement with communities could broaden the Republican coalition, including among Black urban voters and blue-collar workers.
- The hosts criticize campaign consultants for focusing on divisive cultural issues rather than voters’ concerns about affordability, education, jobs, and industrial development. They encourage supporters to volunteer, contact voters, and help others vote.
5. Manufacturing, vocational education, and skilled jobs
- The speakers support expanding trade-school pathways, workforce Pell Grants, and vocational classes such as metalworking and shop. They cite demand for electricians, welders, and other skilled workers in manufacturing and defense production.
- They argue that rebuilding the industrial base can create better-paid jobs and help workers develop practical skills and independent judgment. The program promotes manufacturing investment as both an economic strategy and a way to strengthen communities.
6. Other international and domestic issues
- Developing countries: Boyd argues that a new approach should help countries build their own industries instead of merely exporting raw materials. She presents U.S. policy toward Venezuela and the use of oil revenue as an example, without providing detailed evidence in the transcript about the arrangements discussed.
- Canada: She criticizes Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and speculates that Canada could align more closely with the European Union and British financial interests. She also raises the possibility of U.S. action under the Monroe Doctrine. These are the speaker’s political claims and predictions.
- Immigration and religion: In response to a question about Islam in Western countries, Boyd criticizes globalist approaches to immigration and cultural integration, while stating that Muslims generally should not be treated as a monolithic group. She attributes the growth of radical Islamist movements in part to historical Western policies.
- Voting: The hosts recommend in-person early voting where available, expressing distrust of mail ballots and concern about election-day disruptions. This is their advice, not evidence that mail voting is inherently unreliable.
- Political education: The speakers encourage studying American history and political economy, and recommend Carroll Quigley’s The Anglo-American Establishment and Tragedy and Hope.
Overall takeaway
The program’s central argument is that Trump is attempting to negotiate a comprehensive settlement to the Ukraine war while reshaping international economic relationships around national sovereignty, energy, and industrial growth. Domestically, the hosts advocate manufacturing expansion, vocational training, and outreach to working-class communities. A substantial portion of the broadcast also advances allegations of a coordinated anti-Trump political operation; the transcript presents these allegations through the hosts’ interpretation rather than demonstrating them with independently verifiable evidence.
Note: This summary reflects the supplied transcript and does not independently verify the speakers’ claims.
8
posted on
10/22/2026 3:22:15 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The right of the Democrats to embezzle elections shall not be infringed. )
To: JayGalt
It's almost irrelevant.* The Ukrainian Constitution prevents Z-Man or someone who might replace him from ceding Ukrainian territory. It would have to be put to a referendum, which polls show would lose badly. If Z-Man tries to do it on his own anyway, he'll end up with his head on a pike. Maybe a real one. Then you get someone like Federov (roughly 2:1 more popular in a hypothetical head to head election matchup.) Federov is more aggressive than Z-Man.
*I did say "almost". Putin claimed large Ukie territories back in 2022. That means Ukraine cannot even negotiate a cease fire without a time limit: Putin's claims make a permanent cease fire a de facto ceding of considerable lands to Russia, unless he rescinds those claims, which of course he will not do.
Putin's only hope is to drive out or kill most of the Ukies from all of Ukraine. It's not like Russia hasn't tried it before, just not on quite such a grand / complete scale.
9
posted on
10/22/2026 3:31:14 PM PDT
by
Paul R.
(Who else but Dolly Parton could go so far by being so genuine about being so fake?)
To: JayGalt
narratives to destroy the Nation-state Putin is the only one trying to destroy a nation state-Ukraine.
Russia invaded a sovereign country, crossed an internationally recognized border and launched a war to dismantle its neighbor.
Ukraine is fighting because Russia attacked it.
Nearly every European state supports Ukraine, not out of ideology, but because changing borders by force is a direct threat to their own security.
10
posted on
10/22/2026 4:11:15 PM PDT
by
tlozo
(“Russia war-Either money today or blood tomorrow," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk)
To: tlozo
So sad to see history distorted this way.
11
posted on
10/22/2026 4:38:46 PM PDT
by
JayGalt
(If I only possessed the virtue of conciseness...🦉)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That is a great summary and a service to FR and to me too.
Thank you.
12
posted on
10/22/2026 4:41:28 PM PDT
by
JayGalt
(If I only possessed the virtue of conciseness...🦉)
To: Dr. Franklin
Life is hard, it’s harder still when one is willfully ignorant.
Best wishes.
13
posted on
10/22/2026 5:04:23 PM PDT
by
zek157
( )
To: Dr. Franklin
Life is hard, it’s harder still when one is willfully ignorant.
Best wishes.
14
posted on
10/22/2026 5:04:27 PM PDT
by
zek157
( )
To: tlozo
It’s more complicated than that.
Ukraine held elections in 2014 that were untrustworthy.
Putin offered the winner and Ukraine far more money than the EU.
The winner then strongly favored Russia. Many people in Kiev didn’t like that. They forced the official winner out.
The people in eastern Ukraine who lost their man in Kiev declared independence as people in Virginia and Massachusetts did in 1776.
After about seven years of independence, Ukraine used Turkish drones against the independent republics, which pleaded for rescue from Moscow.
Mama Russian bear came running to protect her cubs....
The war is now almost five years long.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson