Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Vanishing Myth of the Gaza Genocide
Townhall ^ | 10/08/2026 | Dr. Michael Brown

Posted on 10/08/2026 9:42:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I write these words from Poland, where 90 percent of Poland’s Jews — 3 million out of 3.3 million — were slaughtered during World War II. That is what genocide looks like. In stark contrast, roughly 70,000 of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents were killed during Israel’s war with Hamas, amounting to approximately 3 percent of the population. And that figure includes enemy combatants. Yet the same word, genocide, used for the systematic, intentional murder of 90 percent of Poland’s Jews — and two-thirds of Europe’s Jews as a whole — is being used to describe Israel’s war with Hamas. How can this be? And where is the moral equivalence?

Recently, more than 6,000 public figures signed an open letter denouncing the Gaza genocide libel, and while the acute suffering of the people of Gaza must not be minimized, these public figures are correct: it is grossly inaccurate and even immoral to label their suffering a “genocide.”

This does not mean that the IDF always acted justly and morally or that several prominent Israeli leaders have not made inexcusable statements. Nor does debunking the genocide lie minimize the very real and acute suffering of the Gazan population. A tragic death is a tragic death. But tragic deaths in war do not equate with a genocide.

Consider first the numbers involved.

How can this possibly be referred to as a “genocide”?

We are often told that the answer is “intent,” the allegation is that it was the intent of the IDF (and/or the Israeli government) to wipe out the Gazan population, just as the Nazis planned to wipe out Europe’s Jews.

This, too, is categorically false.

To the contrary, Israel took extraordinary measures to minimize civilian casualties, despite Hamas embedding itself in the civilian population and Hamas combatants wearing civilian clothing.

Just two months into the war (as of December 8, 2023), the IDF had made more than 12 million prerecorded phone calls, sent out more than 15 million texts, dropped more than 4.5 million leaflets, and placed more than 45,000 individual calls, “warning civilians to evacuate areas of hostilities and individual targets.”

What other nation has ever made such efforts to spare civilian lives in the midst of a brutal war? This is the opposite of genocidal intent.

As for the charge of starvation, according to Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, more than 1 million metric tons of food entered Gaza between October 7, 2023, and January 17, 2025 alone. Based on the actual composition of the food entering Gaza, this represented roughly 2,600 calories per person per day.

This does not mean that all the food actually reached the people, as there were massive distribution issues. But when it comes to intent, if you’re trying to wipe out a people group, you don’t make every effort to give them time to evacuate before bombing, nor do you send them food if you’re trying to starve them to death.

All this is underscored by the fact that as many as 81 percent of the structures in Gaza were damaged or destroyed in the war, yet only 3 percent of the people were killed. And according to the IDF, at least 25,000 of those killed were Hamas combatants.

There is also the issue of outright propaganda, with charges of “genocide” and “starvation” circulating before the Israeli offensive had even begun.

As documented by NGO Monitor, on October 9, 2023, just two days after the massacre, Al-Haq, Al Mezan and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights accused Israel of “employing starvation as a weapon.” On October 11, Al-Haq said Israeli actions amounted to “acts of genocide.” By October 15, the three groups were calling on states to protect Palestinians “against genocide”—still two weeks before the IDF’s ground invasion.

Yet there’s more.

Israel’s critics have raised the genocide charge against the Jewish state for decades, during which time the Palestinian population in Gaza and the West Bank has grown dramatically.

In 2001, the Durban World Conference Against Racism NGO declaration called for investigation and prosecution of alleged “war crimes, acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing” by Israel. In 2008–09, UN General Assembly President Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann publicly said Israel's actions raised the issue of genocide. In 2014, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas accused Israel at the UN of conducting a “war of genocide” against Palestinians in Gaza.

Contrast all this rhetoric with the fact that in 1967, when Israel took control of Gaza, the population was between 400,000–440,000. Immediately before October 7, 2023, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics estimated 2,226,544 residents. This means that Gaza's Palestinian population had grown by 400–450 percent — all while Israel was committing “genocide” against the people of Gaza!

As for the West Bank, prior to the 1967 war, the population was estimated at 850,000. By 2023, PCBS estimated the population at 3,256,906 — approximately a fourfold increase, or an increase of about 280 percent. Where was the genocide?

Lastly, it has recently been revealed that, according to evidence released by the IDF, 170 Palestinians presented as journalists killed during the war were also operatives in Hamas, Islamic Jihad, or other terrorist organizations, while other Palestinian journalists have openly described Hamas intimidation, interference with content, threats, and resulting self-censorship.

In sum: 1) the number of deaths says there was no genocide; 2) there was no intent to commit genocide (quite the contrary); 3) the charge of genocide was used as a propaganda weapon before the war even began, not to mention in previous decades; and 4) much of the reporting from within Gaza was extremely biased, if not completely propagandistic.

If the IDF committed war crimes, those must be investigated. The extremist voices within Israel must be countered. And the people of Gaza deserve compassion, with a path for a potentially better life.

But, to say it once more, there was no genocide in Gaza. Enough with this perfidious lie.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Gaza; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: genocide; hamas; myth

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 10/08/2026 9:42:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A genocide in Gsza would result in a recreation of a Garden of Eden [once all of the concrete, rebar and tunnels are removed]


2 posted on 10/08/2026 10:22:17 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gaza’s 2.3 million residents
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^i^
Isn’t the word resident inappropriate? Aren’t they citizens of Gaza? It’s subtle but important. Was the author being intentional about using the word resident?

Is my understanding correct? Gaza is about the size of Cape May, New Jersey (in area). It must be very crowded.

Finally, my graduate school program was overwhelmingly Jewish. On the Jewish holidays, the school was empty. I am very distressed that there is so much hate being directed at Jews.


3 posted on 10/08/2026 10:23:05 PM PDT by wintertime ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Billions of Islamists represent a much larger existential risk to da Erf than 16 million Jews.


4 posted on 10/08/2026 10:44:03 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Would be nice if liberals cared about White genocide / replacement in their own Western nations more than a fake genocide in Gaza.


5 posted on 10/09/2026 3:55:53 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

PaLASTinians are so hateful, no other Arab country wants them.

The deaths in Gaza, the suffering in Gaza is due to Hamas and Iran. Nobody else.


6 posted on 10/09/2026 4:08:50 AM PDT by SteelPSUGOP (UGHT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

PaLASTinians are so hateful, no other Arab country wants them.

The deaths in Gaza, the suffering in Gaza is due to Hamas and Iran. Nobody else.


7 posted on 10/09/2026 4:08:55 AM PDT by SteelPSUGOP (UGHT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

“Isn’t the word resident inappropriate? Aren’t they citizens of Gaza? It’s subtle but important. Was the author being intentional about using the word resident?”

Many if not most of the residents of Gaza have called themselves refugees from other locations of the British mandate, forced to flee their non-Gaza Strip homes in the 1948 war.

Of course today most living in the Gaza Strip were born in the Gaza Strip yet still consider themselves refugees because their parents or grandparents were refugees, which is stretching the definition of word “refugee”

Someone who considers themselves to be a refugee may be insulted by being called a citizen of a place they do not consider to be their homeland.

I think the author was correct in calling them residents instead of citizens here.


8 posted on 10/09/2026 4:22:16 AM PDT by ChronicMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; SeekAndFind
wintertime: "Isn’t the word resident inappropriate?
Aren’t they citizens of Gaza?
It’s subtle but important.
Was the author being intentional about using the word resident?"

The author was being both intentional and conventional in describing Gazans as "residents" rather than "citizens" of Palestine.
The reason is that Palestine is not recognized as a state by many countries, including the USA & Israel, and so does not legitimately have "citizens".
To call Gazans "citizens" is to implicitly recognize Palestine as a legitimate country, which neither Americans nor many other western countries do.

Further, Palestinians themselves do not have a full set of citizenship laws defining who is, or is not, a Palestinian.

So "residents" is the term of art used by most westerners.

9 posted on 10/09/2026 4:50:40 AM PDT by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson