Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interest Payments Could Eat Half Your Tax Dollars by 2035
RealClearMarkets ^ | 10/6/26 | Jonathan Dever

Posted on 10/06/2026 2:18:16 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970

The US debt load crossed $40 trillion in August 2026. The Treasury publishes the number and updates it every business day. $32.4 trillion of it is borrowed from investors, pension funds, and foreign governments. Another $7.7 trillion is owed to the government's trust funds, including the funds that pay Social Security and Medicare. I spent two terms chairing the House Financial Institutions Committee, reading numbers like these, page after page. The pace worried me more than the total ever did.

Everyone quotes the Congressional Budget Office’s baseline when they talk about where the debt is headed. CBO is the nonpartisan office Congress itself relies on to score what current law costs. A baseline is simply what CBO expects to happen if nothing changes: no new laws, no recessions, no shocks, current policy running forward on autopilot. On CBO’s published figures, debt held by the public compounds at 5.8% a year over the next decade under that baseline.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearmarkets.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: debt; deficit; inflation; interestrate
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
This is snowball territory, at which point hyperinflation and/or defaulting on the debt become the only real options.
1 posted on 10/06/2026 2:18:16 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Hyperinflation is not necessary—just a steady and gradual increase in inflation to cover the increased interest cost.

Over a few decades the economy would be ruined—but hyperinflation would just be the last steps at the very end.

It is probably best viewed as an exponential curve—so for many years the effect would be relatively mild—and then bang.


2 posted on 10/06/2026 2:21:43 PM PDT by cgbg (Four seconds is all it takes to beat the brainwashing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

No one plans to have hyperinflation. But that’s what you get when a “steady and gradual increase in inflation” gets out of hand. And when people are told or realize that inflation will be picking up, it creates exactly the kind of behavior (increasing velocity of money and unwillingness to hold cash) that creates hyperinflation. I’m skeptical a government could “manage” a high-inflation regime to reduce the debt successfully, based on past experiences.


3 posted on 10/06/2026 2:27:52 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

There is another option. Grow the economy faster than inflation.


4 posted on 10/06/2026 2:42:04 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Imho the bigger risk in the next few years is the collapse of commercial real estate combined with the bankruptcy of some big AI players who cannot produce cash flow.

That would be deflationary of course—and could offset wackadoodle government spending giving an illusion of stability.


5 posted on 10/06/2026 2:42:29 PM PDT by cgbg (Four seconds is all it takes to beat the brainwashing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Speculative opinion pieces:

Study these words and once they are in your are aware of them you will clearly see how you are being manipulated. The following is the result of my prompt with Gemini:

In journalism and media analysis, these terms are often called hedging words, modal verbs, or weasel words. They allow writers to report on predictions, rumors, or subjective interpretations as headlines without asserting them as definitive facts.


1. Modal Auxiliary Verbs (Hypotheticals & Possibility)

These words shift a sentence from a factual statement to a theoretical scenario.

Could (”New Policy Could Cost Billions”)
May (”Target May Close Dozens of Stores”)
Might (”Tensions Might Escalates Next Month”)
Would (”Proposed Law Would Target Small Businesses”)
Should (”Changes Should Spark Consumer Backlash”*)

2. Hedging & Attributive Verbs (Non-Definitive Actions)

These verbs allow the writer to present an interpretation or unverified statement while avoiding direct assertion.

Suggests / Hints / Signals (”Report Suggests Misconduct”)
Appears / Seems (”Economy Seems to Stumble”)
Alleges / Claims (”Lawsuit Alleges Fraud”)
Purports / Hypothesizes (”Study Purports Link Between...”)
Threatens / Portends (”Decisions Threaten Stability”)

3. Qualifying Adverbs & Adjectives (Softening Reality)

Adverbs that distance the reporter from confirming whether the claim is actually true.

Reportedly (”CEO Reportedly Considering Resignation”)
Allegedly (”Official Allegedly Tied to Scandal”)
Potentially / Conceivably (”Move Potentially Devastating for Workers”)
Arguably (”The Arguably Worst Decision of the Quarter”)
Likely / Unlikely (”Tax Cut Likely to Fail”)
Ostensibly / Supposedly (”Ostensibly Neutral Policy Sparks Debate”)

4. Vague Sourcing & Anonymous Attribution (”Weasel Phrases”)

Phrases that project authority or consensus without identifying a specific person making the claim.

“Experts warn...” / “Analysts fear...”
“Sources say...” / “Insiders claim...”
“Critics argue...” / “Observers note...”
“Questions linger...” / “Doubts arise...”
“Some believe...” / “Many consider...”

5. Subjective & Speculative Nouns (Framing Opinions as Events)

Nouns that turn feelings, speculation, or subjective reactions into the main subject of a news headline.

Fears / Concerns (”Fears Mount Over Inflation”)
Outrage / Backlash (”Outrage Grows After Announcement”)
Speculation / Rumors (”Speculation Surrounds Next Quarter”)
Uncertainty / Confusion (”Confusion Reigns After Policy Shift”)


6 posted on 10/06/2026 2:43:55 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Ponzi schemes do that.... I plan on bouncing checks left and right in 2035 just like the government, if I’m still alive. I figured 7 or 8 years waiting on a trial, ankle bracelet at most then 3 hots and a cot..I’m good.


7 posted on 10/06/2026 2:44:22 PM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The US debt load crossed $40 trillion in August 2026.
<><>$32.4 trillion is borrowed
<><>borrowed from investors, pension funds, and foreign governments.
<><>$7.7 trillion is owed to the government’s trust funds,
<><>trust funds that pay Social Security and Medicare.


8 posted on 10/06/2026 2:45:24 PM PDT by Liz (“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies the work of His hands. " (Psalm 19:1))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
There is another option. Grow the economy faster than inflation.

Its a great plan but Congress also keeps increasing spending.

President Ronald Reagan’s final budget for the 1989 fiscal year proposed total outlays of approximately $1.094 trillion

The U.S. total federal budget (spending/outlays) for fiscal year 2025 was $7.01 trillion

9 posted on 10/06/2026 2:50:38 PM PDT by tlozo (“Russia war-Either money today or blood tomorrow," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
"Its a great plan but Congress also keeps increasing spending."

Yep. Raise all the revenue you want.Grow the economy all you can. It won't mean anything until you slash spending

I wish there a party (and a president) that are true fiscal conservatives

10 posted on 10/06/2026 2:57:05 PM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (I'll support Trump when I think he's right. I'll oppose him when I think he's wrong. As it should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Please don't garbage up threads with such pointless spam. The numbers cited here are all too reasonable. If you want to go looking for evidence of manipulation, look for claims that (A) the debt is manageable, with "magic" numbers showing we can easily handle it, or (B) we are going bankrupt tomorrow, with hyperinflation setting in by Christmas.

And actually, since there is more room for unexpected bad stuff to happen rather than an unexpected utopia to suddenly emerge, I think we should give more consideration to the question: What if the economy and government finances are not as rosy the next 10-20 years as they have been? What if things do get fundamentally worse?

11 posted on 10/06/2026 3:02:29 PM PDT by EnderWiggin1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Don’t worry, we won’t run out of money. Our Central Bankers led by CONgress will print everything we need. I’m sure they know what they are doing, they are politicians after all...


12 posted on 10/06/2026 3:07:31 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

this confuses me.

Interest paid to the Federal Reserve (primarily from U.S. government securities and loans) first covers the Fed’s own operating and administrative expenses, and then any remaining net earnings are transferred directly to the U.S. Treasury

The fed reserve takes about 5% for their expenses.


13 posted on 10/06/2026 3:35:01 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
I plan on bouncing checks left and right in 2035 just like the government

Who takes checks without running them first these days?

Better off just maxing out the credit cards and walking.
14 posted on 10/06/2026 3:48:12 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

All the years I worked before becoming disabled, part of my check went to the Thrift Savings Plan. But no messing with it, no investing. Just earning interest.

Was absolutely not interested in the markets and still am not. Too volatile too risky.

One year, during a perilous downturn in the markets, my parents lost over $100K.

Horrible


15 posted on 10/06/2026 3:52:54 PM PDT by Patriot777 ("When you see these things begin to happen, look up, for your redemption draweth nigh.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Only have one credit card but it has no limit so I guess I’m good !! Thanks !!


16 posted on 10/06/2026 4:09:19 PM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

All credit cards have a limit. The no-limit credit cards, like American Express, just won’t tell you what it is.


17 posted on 10/06/2026 4:18:53 PM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Dear Mr. Buffett:

Looking over your Schedule D, you seem to earn a pretty good return on your money - much better than 2% plus the federal new borrowing interest rate.

We’d like to lend your tax money back to you at 2% plus the federal new borrowing interest rate for either 5 or 10 years, your choice.

We can use your interest payment of that 2% to offset an equal amount on our debt.

Uncle Sam & associates


18 posted on 10/06/2026 7:40:32 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Another possibility is to let the federal government borrow at the banks’ CD interest rate when at least 1% less than the federal new borrowing interest rate on like maturities.

If the federal government is paying 6% and the bank is paying 4%, the federal government might insist the bank lend it half of new 4% CD money at 4%.


19 posted on 10/06/2026 7:44:44 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnderWiggin1970

Raise taxes on government pensions.

What can the pensioners do? Quit their jobs?


20 posted on 10/06/2026 7:52:11 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson