Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/21/2026 9:05:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The words “fake poll” took on new meaning as a firm tied to several progressive candidates with apparent big leads closed after the group revealed its voter surveys were fabricated.
The Los Angeles Times (LA Times) reported the polling outfit behind a widely credited survey, which showed Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass with a 12-point lead over challenger Nithya Raman, said the survey was “a short-term social experiment.”
The company’s website said the purpose of the survey’s release was to track “how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification.”
Previously, a poll by the same company, Median Strategies, showed Francesca Hong, the Democrat Socialist candidate in the Wisconsin race for the Democrat nomination for governor, with a 20-point lead.
Hong lost the race by less than 1% just a day later.
In the Los Angeles race, the voter survey for the company was more impactful.
“Doing the work, showing up and gaining momentum,” Bass tweeted about the poll. “Let’s do this, LA!”
She subsequently deleted the social media post.
The summary provided by Median also caused one media outlet to publish the results because it showed Bass doing well with a sizable portion of voters supporting a previous candidate, Spencer Pratt.
“Faced with a choice between the incumbent and a Democratic Socialists of America-aligned challenger, most Pratt voters appear to be treating Bass as the more familiar, more moderate option rather than sitting out the race,” Median wrote in an analysis, according to the LA Times.
The California Post subsequently repeated the analysis, saying Pratt voters could be the key to the race. The Post piece was syndicated on Yahoo.
But, whether Pratt voters decide the race or not, polling in general has been a race to the bottom of voters’ trust bucket.
The latest news from Median emphasized the trend rather than shining a new spotlight on it.
Previously, Heartlander News reported big discrepancies this cycle between polling and election results in Democrat and Republican races.
Independent of the Median survey, pollsters had big misses in Michigan and Wisconsin in the last month.
About two weeks before the Wisconsin Democrat primary, Marquette University published a survey that showed Hong with a 22-point lead in line with other widely published polls.
Michigan U.S. Senate polls for the Democrat primary also missed, showing the ultimate winner, Abdul El-Sayed, up 10-15%. El-Sayed squeaked out a win of just 1%.
Some critics were already complaining polls were having too much of an effect on the outcome of races even before the Median meltdown.
Polls “have been increasingly shaping media narratives and warping public perceptions,” editors at Washington Monthly wrote.
This criticism is generally accelerating in the wake of the Los Angeles survey news, especially among conservatives.
Patrick Ruffini, a GOP pollster, published his own study Tuesday of polling for U.S. Senate races in the last four election cycles, which found the “average polling error across all polls was D+3.7, and 73% of polls released overstated the Democrat relative to the election result.”
The study looked at 3,312 polls.
He cited polling in the 2020 South Carolina race as an example.
That survey showed then-Sen. Lindsey Graham in a race that was virtually tied “almost until the very end.”
Graham won by 10%.
Pew Research noted in its own study in 2024 that the way polls are done today, with faulty demographics and incentives, leads to faulty results.
One survey done by Pew showed 12% of respondents under 30 claimed they had a license to operate a nuclear-powered submarine, when in fact, the number for the nonexistent license is zero.
While Pew said the results were “inadvertently misleading the public,” the more likely explanation for the error is probably the correct one.
“Polling can drive outcomes,” Christian Grose, a USC political science professor, told the LA Times. “Favorable polls lead to more fundraising. There’s a bandwagon effect.”
Some critics have pushed back against the Median Strategies’ explanation that it was a social experiment about the polling ecosystem, calling it “bonkers.”
But the timeline established by the LA Times makes the experimental explanation at least a credible hypothesis:
The last date is probably the most important.
Because whether the survey was fraud, election manipulation, or another explanation, the discussion shows the lasting effect will be a large social experiment.
Polls have been getting it wrong for some time, and the Median episode highlights the problem.
“This is bad for the entire polling industry,” said Mike Yelovich, a GOP-aligned pollster.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Here, hold my poll, Ken Paxton is up by 14.
The “media’ and its low I.Q. princesses. They all hate Americans and our president. They are angry idiots who haven’t got a clue how America works. Real ditzy skanks. They are the morons doing these dumbass “polls.” Luigi and Abby El-Kabong’s girls.
later
Contrary to the media narrative, this poll served a specific purpose. It was meant to lend credibility to the steal.
A candidate polling way behind, who won with thousands of late night mail in votes, would raise needed suspicion. If they were leading in a poll, it would not.
EC
“the purpose of the survey’s release was to track “how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification.”
What liars.
There’s another insidious trick, that the otherwise very non-partisan RealClearPolitics falls for:
On Election Day, Real Clear Politics will often show a weighted poll average showing the Democrat up by eight points, propped up by massive margins reported in sources such as the Washington Post, Reuters, ABC News, etc., like 17 or 22 points. Then, the Democrat loses and such polling outlets release enormous, last-minute swings towards the Republican candidate. When RCP looks at polling accuracy, they include these post-Election Day surveys, making it look like the race had been predicted to be razor-sharp all along.
In 2016, ABC tracking had Clinton up by 12%, Reuters had her up 6%, NBC up 7%, CNBC up 10%. Of these, all were showing up on Election Day as predicting huge Clinton landslides, except ABC which did who a last-minute absolute plunge for Clinton BEFORE the votes were cast. “Well, that’s because of the Russian election meddling! It’s because Comey betrayed Hillary!” Well, of course, neither of those things happened, but here’s the real kicker: Of the polls which predicted a photo-finish, McClatchy, IBD/TIFF, Fox, Rasmussen, and the LA Times, none of them showed this last-minute surge by Trump. They had ALL been showing an absolute deadlock, if not Trump leads BEFORE Election Day
p
Democrat leaders create their own instant polling data, when they get in front of TV and say such things as, ‘most Americans oppose Trump’s border policy’.
It seems to me that polls used to be fairly accurate, but not anymore. I don’t put much faith in them.
I think they were wrong in the 2024 presidential election and waaaaaay wrong in the 2016 election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.