She IS married, to a guy.
What next? Will the Times’ Opera critic write about how to change your oil?
Posted on 06/27/2026 8:42:07 AM PDT by CFW
This isn’t pregnancy. It’s a political plot.
A full-blown, unhinged conspiracy orchestrated by the MAGA movement to take over the hearts, minds and uteruses of gestating people all over the nation, one bassinet, one burp, one stretch mark at a time.
The New York Times has cracked the code. It’s Pulitzer time, baby!
In an investigation masquerading as a style piece, the Paper of Record published an unglued commentary, researched with the self-seriousness of Watergate, revealing that a whopping three women connected to the White House are preggers.
That Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller and Second Lady Usha Vance should all be on the nest simultaneously isn’t just a happy mini baby boom. It is — according to the Times — a pernicious “Handmaid’s Tale”-style political plot promoting conservative child-making frenzy in an age of declining birthrates and the collapse of the Democratic Party in middle America.
It’s a cautionary fable, a warning that the dreaded GOP’s steady rate of reproduction amid a Democratic baby drought poses a dire threat to the nation.
According to the Gray Lady (now Gray Female-Identifying Newspaper) Republicans are planning to win support and ever-greater numbers of adherents by growing their own voters. One infant at a time.
It’s all laid out in the piece entitled “The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Or maybe not.
“But” — there’s always a “but” — “for an administration that has such an intuitive and strategic understanding of the power of aesthetics that an unspoken dress code in which men outfit themselves in the image of the president has developed, it has also become a telling one,” Friedman froths.“Together, the women have created a notably consistent, and somewhat paradigm-shifting, picture of the White House’s family and fertility platform.”
Fertility platform? Silly me. I thought the three lovelies just got themselves knocked up.
They’re really gonna shit when they find out some women are getting married in a church.
Whether it is too late or not is another question, but having children when the other side is not makes it inevitable that you win elections. Even in New York or California.
🤣🤣🤣
Conservatives can have all the babies they want but if they send them to the Marxist public schools it won’t matter at all.
Usha bought her coral maternity dress (original price $49.99) on sale at Old Navy for $8.75 and posted the receipt. Vance joked that Usha should be put in charge of the federal budget.
At some point, an anti-human death cult will have to come to terms with the logic of its own anti-marriage, anti-children position.
The three ladies in question are:
1) Married ... to actual men.
2) Very well constructed.
That they are with child is hardly surprising.
She IS married, to a guy.
What next? Will the Times’ Opera critic write about how to change your oil?
Usha bought her coral maternity dress (original price $49.99) on sale at Old Navy for $8.75 and posted the receipt. Vance joked that Usha should be put in charge of the federal budget.
I saw that. Conservative women were saying “What a great deal!” while leftists were mocking her for paying so little for a dress.
And if the MAGA plot is successful those children will be taught bible stories as they grow up .
Not if those kids are brainwashed in school and by the "media".
I’m waiting for the NYT to do a critical analysis of the high birth-rate among Muslim women. I won’t be holding my breath.
it’s you responsibility as a parent to make sure that doesn’t happen
Any bets on whether the author played the opening scenes for Idiocracy as an example of Republicans breeding like bunnies?
This is anecdotal, and is not representative of overall demographic stats.
They still won’t get it.
Which is hilarious for people who claim to understand population biology.
What a cheap, low-quality maternity dress! $8.75? Hell, I spent $8000 for my daughter's prom dress, $3000 for the decorations and $4000 for the Bentley rental! That took years of scrimping and saving to give her that one-time prom experience!
The NY Times is feigning outrage, this is a head fake.
Progressives own the schools because nobody wants to abolish the department of education.
So it does not matter that democrat parents abort their children and republican mothers produce more children.
Progressives get the privilege of indoctrinating them into good mamdani voters.
Education is destiny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.