Posted on 06/25/2026 1:49:31 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Ten years following the landmark vote, the EU's former Brexit negotiator said the bloc's door is open to the UK, but that London "cannot cherry-pick" EU policies. Former European Union Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier told Euronews that it is up to the United Kingdom to decide whether it would want to rejoin the bloc, but that Brussels has made its conditions clear.
His comments come ten years after the UK voted to leave the EU by 52% to 48%, and at a time when polling shows a clear majority of the British public, across party lines, views doing so as a mistake.
"Brexit decided by a sovereign vote 10 years ago is done, but the future is open, and the door is open," Barnier, a prominent centre-right politician who was Prime Minister of France from September to December 2024, said on Euronews' programme 12 Minutes With.
He argued that the UK government and political parties know what the conditions for rejoining are, noting that it should be clear to London that it "cannot have its cake and eat it" when it comes to negotiating its future relationship with Brussels.
Barnier, who referred to Brexit as a lose-lose game, explained that it would, for example, be possible for the UK to join the single market — the bloc's borderless economic area — without joining the EU, as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway have done.
"But the conditions are very clear for any country joining the single market," he said, adding that one of them would be "respecting the four freedoms" — free movement of goods, services, people and capital.
Becoming a full member of the single market, however, is currently seen as a non-starter.
Not joining the single market was a key "red line" for the Labour government under outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer. It was his way of sticking to his party's pre-election manifesto pledges in a bid to appease Leave voters while navigating a "reset" with the EU.
Instead, Starmer's approach was to take the UK further into the market in some sectors. However, this partial or "à la carte" arrangement has historically not been on the table for the EU. Barnier echoed that the UK should not be allowed to cherry-pick from EU policies.
It is unclear where Andy Burnham, who is currently an MP and the most likely candidate to replace Starmer in Number 10 following his resignation on Monday, stands on the matter.
Liberal Democrats and pro-EU Labour MPs have already urged him to "drop the red lines" on the single market and customs union, which Brussels sees as a key snag in the rapprochement efforts.
Rapid re-entry is possible
Barnier hinted at a possible fast-tracked process for the UK if the remaining alignment on regulation continues, eluding the long, complex, multi-phase accession process faced by candidate countries such as Ukraine, Moldova and Western Balkan states.
"The answer [to how long the process will take] is in the hands of the UK," he said. "If from now to the time of new negotiations starting, the UK creates a huge divergence from the standards, the norms for food, for security, we will have a problem, and it will take time, much more time."
He noted that, "if there is no divergence, no crucial divergence, it will be very rapid," adding, "We can't compare the very long process for new countries that want to access the EU and former member states."
In the meantime, Barnier said, Brussels and London can work together on many fronts.
"We have a lot to do together, for instance, for defence, for security, for cooperation between the services, even for investment in artificial intelligence or new technologies that we are seeing," he said.
He proposed to facilitate this type of cooperation between the UK and the EU through the creation of a new body, referring to "a kind of European Council for Defence and Security", which would sit "alongside the current institutions".
"This would be open to some countries that are no longer or not yet in the EU, for instance, obviously the UK, but also Norway or Ukraine."
The UK and EU are in the midst of "reset talks" and were hoping to conclude talks on an agrifood agreement (slashing barriers by aligning sanitary and phytosanitary rules), an emissions trading deal, and a youth mobility scheme (granting special visas to young Europeans and Britons) at a summit on 22 July.
However, European Council President António Costa confirmed earlier this week that the meeting, for which a date was set only last week at the G7 summit in France, would be postponed in light of Starmer's resignation.
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
the leftists never give up, not for a moment
they’re relentless
Of course it is.
If the UK were to vote again on Brexit it would be 65-35 in favor of “Remain”.
UK, DO NOT GO OVER TO THE DARK SIDE!
Number 1 on Keir Starmers wish list serving his Davos masters. Watch just how quickly Andy Burnham picks up the mantle laying in the rubbish bin at 10 Downing.
1 - Return the UK back under the oppressive authoritarian rule of Brussels, being done in service to his WEF globalists planners.
2 - Divide Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.
3 - Shutdown free speech and the sharing of truth.
4 - Force Digital IDs, CBDCs and Social Credit Scores, all controlled, managed and monitored by AI algorithms redistributing resources.
All roads lead to anti-Christ.
Canada’s Carney will want in first ,LOL
“Brexit as a lose-lose game,”
That is true.
The UK was a strong force opposing the Paris-Berlin axis
Flt and I are in the midst of a long discussion on this (I promise to reply tomorrow flt).
France does not want the UK back in the EU.
Poland, Romania, italy etc would be willing to let the UK back with the same opt outs it had before but France will not countenance it - they didn’t want ths UK in the first place.
France will insist that the conditions for the UK joining are
1. Give up the pound
2. Join the Schengen
Most of the REMAIN voters would baulk at that.
I do not see rejoining as happening anytime soon
How specifically is the UK being hurt by not being in the EU?
How specifically is the US being hurt by not being in the EU?
No it was not. Berlin always got what it wanted.
Labour will ram this through as quick while they still have all the national power and there will be no going back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.