Skip to comments.
The Democrats Just Laid Down Their Arms. Again.
The New Republic via Yahoo! News ^
| Sat, May 16, 2026 at 5:00 AM CDT
| Jason Linkins
Posted on 05/17/2026 4:45:18 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
- Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has chosen not to pursue a solution that could save the congressional district maps approved by voters, despite a potential legal option available to her.
- The Virginia state Supreme Court's decision to throw out the amended congressional district maps has left Democrats facing a dilemma in upholding the will of the voters before the November elections.
- Democrats are grappling with the need to adopt more aggressive political tactics in response to the GOP's rapid redistricting efforts and potential threats to majority-minority districts in blue states.
Last week, I wrote about how the far right’s capture of governing institutions like the Supreme Court has put Democrats in the jackpot, forcing them to make some hard choices. Indeed, the decision laid before Democrats is one of the most famous choices ever laid out in the English language: whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take up arms against a sea of troubles—and by opposing, end them. In a troubling sign for Democrats, Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has chosen the former.At issue is the Virginia state Supreme Court’s decision to throw out the amended congressional district maps that voters just approved—in a referendum that cost the Democrats some $70 million, as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line. In the immediate aftermath of the ruling, Spanberger offered a limp proclamation, saying that she was “disappointed” by it but that her “focus as Governor will be on ensuring that all voters have the information necessary to make their voices heard this November.”
But it turns out that Spanberger was missing...
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Somebody call the waaambulance!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“...as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line.” Not so much.
3
posted on
05/17/2026 4:48:11 PM PDT
by
GMThrust
(.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line”
If they had, the Virginia Supreme Court wouldn’t have ruled against them.
4
posted on
05/17/2026 4:48:32 PM PDT
by
GMMC0987
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s a shame. I heard the commies were about to rip up the warranty and start over. Takes a ton of work to do it that way.
5
posted on
05/17/2026 4:50:17 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: GMThrust
I stopped reading at that line. It was painfully obvious that the Democrats failed to follow the state constitution. Heck, some Democrats on the governor’s staff warned about this.
6
posted on
05/17/2026 4:50:27 PM PDT
by
Lysandru
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Written by a scumbag leftist neckbeard.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A good read. I ended up feeling sorry for him. Not!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
upholding the will of the votersHorseshit. It was half of the voters and half of the voters don't get to change, much less violate, the state Constitution whenever they feel like it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It was a step too far even for them.
10
posted on
05/17/2026 4:53:27 PM PDT
by
Williams
(Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
At issue is the Virginia state Supreme Court’s decision to throw out the amended congressional district maps that voters just approved—in a referendum that cost the Democrats some $70 million, as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line.Lie. It was an unconstitutional effort bypassing the state elections commission as prescribed by the State Constitution. Spanbergwr and the Dems in VA want a plebeacite system….
11
posted on
05/17/2026 4:57:31 PM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Ok In anyq war between the civilized man and the savage, support lthe civilized man.👨 so t tv)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“...in a referendum that cost the Democrats some $70 million, as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line.”
Riiiight.
Methinks the VA SC oh-so-slightly disagreed - on legal, not political grounds.
Where’s that “Not this $hit again” gif...?
12
posted on
05/17/2026 4:59:00 PM PDT
by
BB62
(Iran)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"...as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the line..." Beg to differ. The Supreme Court of Virginia confirmed that what they did NOT play by the rules, painstakingly or otherwise.
They broke several laws in getting the whole thing ramrodded thru to the ballot.
13
posted on
05/17/2026 5:00:21 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Conservatives can't afford to sit out. Vote like your freedom depends on it, it does!)
To: ClearCase_guy
“Democrats facing a dilemma in upholding the will of the voters“
It takes the rat scumbags at Yahoo to manage that much spin and propaganda. It’s worthy of Rolling Stone or daily beast.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This article is filled with lies.
15
posted on
05/17/2026 5:02:10 PM PDT
by
Frank Drebin
(And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
as they painstakingly played by all the rules to get it over the lineExcept they didn't play by all the rules. The Virginia Constitution required an election between new maps being adopted and those new maps being applied. There was no election between. Ergo unconstitutional.
I notice he said nothing about how Leftists captured the SCOTUS in the 60s and 70s and a lot of what the SCOTUS has done in the last 10 years is simply to roll back some of the excesses of the Warren and Burger courts. What extreme tactics should Republicans have adopted 50 years ago in response to Leftists having control over the SCOTUS?
16
posted on
05/17/2026 5:04:24 PM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"The idea Yeargain poses would be to lower the official retirement age to 54"
Age discrimination! Liberals don't even mature until well past that age.
17
posted on
05/17/2026 5:06:12 PM PDT
by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: clearcarbon
"The idea Yeargain poses would be to lower the official retirement age to 54" Sounds like a bill of attainder.
18
posted on
05/17/2026 5:07:58 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If it ain't fun, you ain't doin' it right.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Democrats facing a dilemma in upholding the will of the voters. Yes, ever since "the will of the democRATs" was to maintain slavery, the democRATs/DemoKKKrats have had issues.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“...despite a potential legal option available to her”
“Legal option” my a$$, The two highest courts in their universe ruled against them. They were OUT of options!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson