Posted on 05/15/2026 12:51:53 PM PDT by Rummyfan
Nicholas Kristof raped my dog. At least that is what I have heard, from an anonymous source. A source who is intensely hostile to the New York Times columnist. And that’s good enough for me. Now I come to think of it, my pet pug has had a strange look on his face lately.
As it happens, the rumor that I have just attempted to spread is far less lurid and fanciful than the one that the New York Times chose to spread around the world this week.
In a piece that has already been widely debunked, Kristof claimed that Israeli prison guards routinely use rape as a method of torture on Palestinian prisoners. The piece portrayed Israeli prison guards and soldiers as rapists, sadists and akin to Nazi prison camp guards. Perhaps even worse.
Kristof’s most grotesque claim is based on an anonymous source who is described as a “journalist” from Gaza. According to this source, while being held in an Israeli prison in 2024, the Gazan man was stripped naked, blindfolded and handcuffed. Then “a dog was summoned.” The dog’s handler — who we are helpfully told was speaking Hebrew — then encouraged the dog to “mount him.”
The “source” goes on to claim that he “tried to dislodge the dog, but it penetrated him.” During this time, the Israeli guards were allegedly taking photos and filming the assault while laughing and “giggling.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
because they are Jew hating leftists like most liberal/liberal outlets...
Nicholas Kristof has the sads that he can’t join a Nazi Army like his Dad.
People with no morals have a difficult time understanding those that do.
The left is a suicide cult, the Jewish left doubly so.
The New York Slimes is one of the propaganda arms of The Party Of Death, The Party Of Hate.
Haters gonna hate.
Yep
Can’t tell the difference between the NY Times and Sucker Saracen these days
Why???
You would have to be older than 90 to understand why...
In the 1920s and 1930s, The New York Times published articles and profiles on Adolf Hitler that have been heavily criticized as severely misguided and credulous. Rather than directly praising him, early coverage tended to dismiss his extremism, underestimate his threat, and treat his anti-Semitism as mere political rhetoric rather than a genuine ideology.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.