Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/13/2026 10:41:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
For generations, Americans viewed homes as more than assets. They were the physical foundation of family stability, equity-building, and civic continuity — the bedrock of a middle-class society rooted in dispersed private ownership. Owning a home was analogous to owning a piece of the American Dream itself: a symbol of citizen sovereignty and national agency.
That understanding is fading.
Recently, while selling a property, I encountered a buyer who presented himself as a flipper. The contract revealed something else: minimal earnest money, aggressive escape clauses, cash-only terms, and assignment language that treated the deal more like a tradable derivative than a transfer of ownership. The buyer was not acquiring shelter — he was a node in a faster-moving liquidity chain. Ownership itself was merely a friction point in high-velocity arbitrage play.
This was not an anomaly. It was a window into a stratified, financialized housing system operating in parallel to the traditional market. Housing is not being transformed in isolation. It is following the same path as much of the American economy: from production to speculation, from stewardship to extraction, from ownership to managed access.
At the base sits the fastest-growing tier: wholesalers and rapid-turn resellers. These operators secure distressed or off-market properties using low-capital, assignable contracts, often backed by private credit or hard-money networks. Many never intend to close at all; the contract itself becomes the product, flipped upward through the liquidity chain.
Above them are renovation flippers who add physical value through rehabilitation and modernization. Then come the digital distribution platforms — Zillow, Redfin, Realtor.com, and increasingly algorithmic lead-generation systems that dominate pricing, visibility, and consumer behavior through data control.
Traditional brokerages occupy a slower, relationship-driven tier increasingly pressured by automation, platform economics, and flat-fee competition. At the top sit institutional builders, private-equity-backed developers, and large capital pools
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
A young person in my family said” my generation doesn’t buy houses. We sleep on each other sofas.”
The public’s intense focus on large institutional players is understandable. For years, headlines have warned that BlackRock (and similar firms) are “buying up every house in America,” fueling legitimate anxiety about corporate control of the housing market. This narrative helped drive President Trump’s January 2026 executive order and congressional measures aimed at curbing large-scale institutional purchases of single-family homes.
Yet the data puts the scale in perspective: even the most aggressive institutional investors collectively own well under 1% of the nation’s single-family housing stock nationally — a share that has been shrinking. While these highly visible actors deserve scrutiny, the faster, more pervasive financialization is happening lower in the stack — among wholesalers, assignors, and private-credit networks that treat contracts themselves as tradable assets on a daily basis.
Investor purchases now account for roughly 30% of U.S. single-family home sales, while cash buyers — heavily overlapping with these investor networks — remain near one-third of transactions, well above pre-pandemic norms.
This is classic financialization.
You never own your house until property taxes and removed.
Blackstone not Blackrock.
Damn right. They just doubled my property taxes after reappraisal. It’s more like renting from the government now.
RE: You never own your house until property taxes and removed.
So, how does your county or district pay of its schools, fire department, street cleaning, dead tree removals, garbage collection, paving, etc.?
“puts the scale in perspective”
The proper perspective is that the big players concentrate their buys in certain types of subdivisions, certain types of neighborhoods.
Easy to collect the rent; easy to perform maintenance and easy to buy the local government “inspectors” are key criteria. Re-sale value is a consideration..a minor consideration.
I’ve flipped 2 houses and 2 condos, all in retirement. Used my nest egg and lived in squalor while turning the places into marketable finished products. Only a single guy with no wife to nag him could take on those jobs. By living in the project I saved money on rent somewhere else and did the grunt work. Paid top dollar only for the skilled part. Joined the gym when there was no plumbing. My trips to Home Depot were enjoyable. I’d love to do it again but I’m too old.
As for those institutional investors I’d put it on the government. Zoning laws, environmentalists, and unenforced immigration forces prices up. I do believe there are plenty of individuals out there like me who are ready to pull the trigger on a good deal. Otherwise HD and Lowes would never have grown.
100%.
United Nations Agenda 2030
Population Reduction
Replacement Immigration (United Nations)
You’ll Own Nothing And You’ll Be Happy ™️
[Danish politician Ida Auken
in a 2016 article for the
World Economic Forum (WEF).]
The upper class are literally financing the appreciation of their own assets. NVIDIA funds AI firms buying its chips. Publicly traded corporations act like cash extraction enterprises strip-mining companies of assets by sale or borrowing, firing employees, reducing quality until the "active" investors sell the pumped up stock to suckers like retirement funds or you and me and the company starts to fail. Everywhere it's Enron with capital chasing its own tail but on a continental scale.
Our out of control managerial classes in business and government are effectively looting the United States.
“This narrative helped drive President Trump’s January 2026 executive order and congressional measures aimed at curbing large-scale institutional purchases of single-family homes.”
Just another reality show. The order was written in such a way that it is easily skirted by Blackrock. Just more huckster shuck and jive from DC...
Of all the sales of real estate, how many are located in, or are representatives, of other countries?
With prop taxes. Road taxes are supposedly from vehicle registration and fuel taxes.
What I am saying is there needs to be another way other than perpetually taxing your assets, it never ends. Everything needs to be based on an ad valorum tax (no income tax either other than maybe a low (10% or less) flat tax (businesses can be something else), no deductions/exemptions/loop-holes). No tax breaks for certain businesses they pay the same rate as other business, no more picking winners and losers. KISS principle.
I find it extremely unfair that you have to pay school taxes if your kids are grown or you never had any. That all started with the BS government take-over of schools. In other times the people that had kids paid for the school and teacher and they settled and built country.
I would prefer sales tax over ad valorum. My bad.
Basically, the “American Dream” was always a fictional construct built on massive government intervention that eliminated any semblance of a housing “market.”
The first stage of this intervention was the homestead laws of the 19th century, through which the government basically gave land away to settlers. While that certainly distorted the housing “market” in a big way, it retained an important element of a market economy by establishing conditions that required homesteaders to use the land productively.
The second stage was far worse because it occurred after the Industrial Revolution when the idea of “using the land productively” became a completely alien idea to the vast majority of Americans who had grown accustomed to: (1) working for someone else (typically a giant corporation), and (2) living some distance away from where they worked.
I would contend that this financialization of the housing market is really just a modern manifestation of something that had been the norm for much of American history — where your typical American is really just a sharecropper or tenant farmer living on someone else’s property while working for a living.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.