Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer: Democrats will make stand against $1 billion White House ballroom
The Hill ^ | May 11, 2026 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 05/11/2026 5:01:01 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) is rallying fellow Democrats in a new “Dear Colleague” letter for a battle royale on the Senate floor over $1 billion in proposed funding for President Trump’s 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom that’s tucked into a $72 billion Republican-drafted budget reconciliation package.

Schumer is planning to turn the Senate floor debate and marathon voting session on the reconciliation bill into a referendum on lowering costs and scrapping the earmark for the ballroom.

“At a time when Americans can’t make ends meet, Republicans say ‘Let them eat cake’ — and then hand Trump a billion dollars to build a ballroom to serve it in,” Schumer wrote in his letter to Senate Democrats on Sunday.

“Americans do not need a ballroom. They need relief. They want their Congress and their President to address the growing cost crisis bearing down on families across the country,” he wrote.

The Republican bill, which was drafted by the Senate Judiciary and Homeland Security committees, would fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol through 2029 — circumventing the Democratic blockade of funding for those two agencies spurred by the fatal shooting of two anti-ICE protesters in Minneapolis.

The bill also provides $1.46 billion for the Department of Justice’s national security division, Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S. Marshal’s Service.

And it provides $1 billion to support security enhancements to Trump’s ballroom project.

Critics say much of the security money could be used for the construction of the ballroom itself even though the bill bars the funding from being used for non-security elements.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 9yeartroller; ballroom; chuckschumer; chucktheschmuck; chucky; democrats; demonicrats; newyork; schumer; security; senate; tds; tdsbelow; trumpballroon; upchuckschumer; whatshisfrnick; whitehouse; whitehouseballroom
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
Did the republicans really add ballroom funding after announcing it was being built with private funding?

My guess is Chucky is misstating the budget, however I don't put it past the stupid party engaging in self sabotage.

1 posted on 05/11/2026 5:01:01 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Good. This is a clearly compromised administration that shouldn’t be building major military/intel infrastructure in the WH.


2 posted on 05/11/2026 5:06:12 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The Ballroom will be privately funded.
It’s the Bunker underneath the Ballroom
that needs the funding.


3 posted on 05/11/2026 5:07:17 AM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRobr 12-2-2023 DITT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The old contactor “make a bid, start demolition and then raise the price after it’s too late” trick. There hasn’t been some new security increase for the White House itself (all assassination attempts have been off site), so any security costs should have been in the he original price.


4 posted on 05/11/2026 5:07:57 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (If the Islamic Republic government is in power in Iran when the war is over, we will have lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Couldn’t figure out why suddenly funding was being sought for something being privately funded.

Perhaps it’s so a claim of Congressional Approval can be made to end any litigation. Maybe.

But the cynic in me says that someone in Congress had an epiphany. “Wait, something is being built in DC and we aren’t having a chance to ram it through with tons of pork stacked on it?!?! We can’t have that! Quick, cue the corruption and let’s get our cronies paid!!”


5 posted on 05/11/2026 5:08:52 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“This is a clearly compromised administration that shouldn’t be building....”

So you’re in agreement with Schumer on this. What else are you and Schumer in agreement on?


6 posted on 05/11/2026 5:09:14 AM PDT by Justa (Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I suppose it would be better to have events outside in the mud with porto-potties. A dignified Whitehouse deserves a dignified ballroom. Imho.


7 posted on 05/11/2026 5:09:46 AM PDT by Omnivore-Dan (have to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

This is probably the President of the USA who NEEDS the most protection. The LIBs/DIMs have attempted to murder him several times.


8 posted on 05/11/2026 5:10:08 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I wish that you would’ve remained a lurker.

CC


9 posted on 05/11/2026 5:10:35 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“compromised “

Define “compromised”.


10 posted on 05/11/2026 5:12:01 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You are just a very stupid and egregiously ignorant poster


11 posted on 05/11/2026 5:12:31 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Quid Quid Nominatur Fabricatur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Schumer taking a stand against a government project to spend more government money reminds me of the quote “ We must do something about this immediately! Immediately! Immediately! Harrumph! Harrumph! Harrumph!”.


12 posted on 05/11/2026 5:14:01 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

First of all there is no such $1 billion dollars that is devoted to the ballroom. Stop listening to the leftist media much less Chuck schumer.

The federal government is going to have to start paying for the security and other costs of the ballroom once it’s been constructed and this bill allows some unspecified amount of money to be directed towards the Secret Services activities associated with the ballroom.

Maybe you think someone else should pay the light and heat bill for the rest of time as well.


13 posted on 05/11/2026 5:14:03 AM PDT by Williams (Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

It’s not Trump’s Ballroom but their stupid supporters believe it is or will when the democrats finish ,LOL


14 posted on 05/11/2026 5:15:17 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Instead of posting your own stupid ideas why don’t you actually learn what’s happening? This bill permits some unspecified amount of money to be devoted to the security provided by the Secret Service in the ballroom.


15 posted on 05/11/2026 5:15:50 AM PDT by Williams (Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

No the 1 billion is to renovate the bunker which is below the east wing.


16 posted on 05/11/2026 5:15:51 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

It’s so Deep State can get its hooks knto the project.


17 posted on 05/11/2026 5:17:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

no stand on zippys basketball playground though


18 posted on 05/11/2026 5:17:16 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

And you shouldn’t rely on the information/propaganda That the Hill puts out for Schumer and the Democrats. Simple minds fall for it every single time.


19 posted on 05/11/2026 5:20:21 AM PDT by Eli Kopter (ED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

This


20 posted on 05/11/2026 5:20:35 AM PDT by silverleaf (“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out” —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson