Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Strikes Down Trump's 10 Percent Global Tariffs
Townhall ^ | 05/07/2026 | Scott McClallen

Posted on 05/07/2026 8:09:45 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

A U.S. trade court has ruled against President Donald Trump’s 10 percent global tariffs.

The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled 2-1 that a 1970s law doesn’t allow the president to enact sweeping tariffs worldwide.

The State of Oregon, a spice company called Burlap and Barrel, and a toy company named “Basic Fun Inc.” challenged the tariffs.

Article 1, Section eight of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to levy duties, collect taxes, and more.

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 gives some of that power to the president. It allows the president to impose temporary surcharges up to 15 percent.

On Feb. 20, Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on imports effective on Feb. 24 through July 24.

Trump justified the tariffs because the U.S. runs a trade deficit with many other countries.

The plaintiffs claimed that the president doesn’t have the authority to invoke those tariffs “because large and serious balance-of-payments deficits cannot occur in a floating exchange rate monetary system,” according to the 88-page ruling.

The plaintiffs suffered economic harm, price erosion, a loss of goodwill, damaged reputation, and more, the court ruled.

“Finally, considering the balance of hardships, a remedy in equity is warranted, and the public interest would be served by a permanent injunction,” the ruling said.

The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled against Trump’s tariffs. That ruling ordered the U.S. to refund tariffs, which is expected to cost about $166 billion.

Trump has viewed tariffs as a national security tool. He says that tariffs encourage domestic manufacturing instead of shipping jobs overseas.

Since Trump's most recent election, manufacturing has boomed in the U.S., according to data from the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Much of the Rust Belt – Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Illinois – relied on manufacturing jobs and was decimated after those jobs moved to China and other countries that use slave or cheaper labor.

Trump says that his tariffs brought better deals for U.S. workers and companies that want to build items in the U.S. again. Manufacturing accounted for more than 30 percent of jobs in 1960 but has since plummeted, taking away blue-collar jobs from many in the Midwest.

The ruling is bad news for manufacturing workers in the U.S.

Trump previously said he’s secured $18 trillion in investments through tariffs, which would create more jobs and raise wages. For example, auto maker Stellantis says that it will invest $13 billion in auto plants across the Midwest.

His tariffs triggered many countries to renegotiate their trade agreements with the U.S to give us more favorable trade agreements.

BREAKING: Federal trade court strikes down Trump’s backup tariff plan, imposed after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad-based tariffs.

Going to need some economists to chew on this one.

https://t.co/EqO0YH22tJ pic.twitter.com/NmhG5qZvit— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) May 7, 2026

NEW YORK, May 7 (Reuters)
The U.S. Trade Court on Thursday ruled against President Donald Trump's latest 10% global tariffs, finding across-the-board tariffs were not justified under a 1970s trade law.— Jarrett Renshaw (@JarrettRenshaw) May 7, 2026

No reaction yet from the Trump administration, which can and likely will appeal, ultimately to the Supreme Court.

But interestingly, CIT cited the Supreme Court's own tariff ruling from February in its opinion as to why these 122 tariffs are illegal as well:

pic.twitter.com/0OolRu2BDf— Megan Cassella (@mmcassella) May 7, 2026



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: court; tariffs

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 05/07/2026 8:09:45 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, One Federal Plaza, New York, New York, 10278-0001, appointed by President Barack Obama on May 28, 2013; Judge Barnett began his service as Chief Judge on April 6, 2021.

Claire R. Kelly, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, One Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278-0001, appointed by President Barack Obama on May 28, 2013.

TIMOTHY C. STANCEU, Senior Judge, United States Court of International Trade, One Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278-0001, appointed by President George W. Bush in 2003. Born in 1951, Canton, OH.


2 posted on 05/07/2026 8:16:21 PM PDT by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Commie fascists....


3 posted on 05/07/2026 8:16:22 PM PDT by Paladin2 ( YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If not tariffs then quotas.


4 posted on 05/07/2026 8:28:15 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How does the state of Oregon have standing in a Federal court overseeing international trade and Federal law?


5 posted on 05/07/2026 9:03:01 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Democrat Party - like the love child of La Cosa Nostra and Al Qaeda )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Oregon claimed they would incur increased annual costs because state agencies are major purchasers of imported goods (e.g., equipment, supplies, and construction materials) affected by the tariffs.


6 posted on 05/07/2026 9:12:31 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

And yet voters have no standing when it comes to election integrity.


7 posted on 05/07/2026 9:26:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Democrat Party - like the love child of La Cosa Nostra and Al Qaeda )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

F””k the tariffs.

F””k Iran.

F””k the idiot advisors who started them.

Get back to work.


8 posted on 05/07/2026 10:26:11 PM PDT by period end of story (Unvaxxed for my protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson