Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/07/2026 7:49:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I think it has been pretty obvious for a long time that AOC's fundamental belief about capitalism is that it's a bad system which only exists because rich people want to take advantage of poor people.
Today, there's a new podcast out hosted by Ilana Glazer in which AOC goes on a rant about billionaires. Her basic argument is that no one can legitimately earn a billion dollars. It's simply impossible.
AOC: “There’s a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned. You can’t earn a billion dollars. You just can’t earn that. You can get market power, you can break rules, you can abuse labor laws, you can pay people less than what they’re worth, but you can’t earn… pic.twitter.com/tUi9xTlQ2B— Marco Foster (@MarcoFoster_) May 7, 2026
Just so I'm not accused of misquoting AOC, I went and found the full podcast and looked at the transcript before and after this clip. I'm going to post it here so you can see it too.
AOC: And so what happens is, like, when you have these systems, when you have corporations, when you have an economic elite, they have not...there's a certain level of wealth and accumulation that is unearned. Right? You can't earn a billion dollars.
Glazer: That's right.
AOC: You just can't earn that.
Glazer: That's exactly correct.
AOC: You can, you can get market power. You can break rules. You can do all sorts of things. You can abuse labor laws. You can pay people less than what they're worth. But you can't earn that, right? And so you have to create a myth that, since you didn't earn that, you have to create a myth of earning it.
And so if you're making minimum wage at a Walmart and you're making seven bucks an hour, and I mean, damn, with these gas prices it takes you seven bucks to get to work...And so as a result, we've kind of internalized this moralized system, right? The people at the top are smarter, better, you know, more sophisticated and therefore the people at the bottom are uneducated, lazy, etc.
She goes on but you probably get the gist. Initially, she's not talking about individuals, she's talking about corporations. She's saying corporations can't really earn a billion dollars, not without cheating someone.
This is obviously hogwash. Lots of corporations have billions of dollars of revenue every year. She mentions WalMart so let's start with them. WalMart has about 4,500 stores in the U.S. and generates just shy of $500 billion in revenue (in the U.S.). That means WalMart is taking in more than $1 billion per day.
Of that amount, WalMart earns about $132 billion in gross profit for a gross margin of 27%. But after paying all the other costs associated with the business, from rent to taxes to marketing, WalMart earns a net income of about 3% of their revenue. They don't seem to have a figure for the US alone but globally their net income was $22 billion last year.
As for AOC's claims about salaries, they are also completely false. Entry-level Walmart jobs in Washington, DC where she works pay $18 to $21 per hour. And the company has a minimum salary of $14 per hour that applies everywhere in the U.S. So literally no one is making $7 an hour. And $14 is starting pay. The average pay for Walmart's 500,000 hourly workers is $18.25. That's higher than the minimum wage in New York, where AOC lives.
In addition to paying salaries for 1.6 million people, WalMart also pays a lot of money in taxes, around $7 billion in state and federal taxes. It pays another billion per year in property taxes and nearly $14 billion in sales taxes.
What likely upsets AOC about WalMart is that they are successful but not unionized. No doubt she'd prefer a union negotiated pay of $22 an hour. Then the unions could filter millions from dues into Democratic campaigns. That's the system Democrats all prefer.
Anyway, the idea that you can't legitimately earn a billion dollars is silly. An individual can't do that, but lots of big companies do, including ones that AOC likely patronizes. She owns a Tesla. Does she own an iPhone? Does she order things on Amazon? Does she use Google? Does she spend time on Facebook? Does she own a major brand TV or refrigerator? Does she subscribe to Netflix or rent films produced by the major studios?
The point is that these big companies make money because even socialists like AOC buy their products and services. Millions of other people do too, which is how these companies end up making billions, not by cheating people but by offering them something they want at a good price.
As for her broader idea about the myth of hard work, I think hard work is part of success and so is being educated and smart. If you have none of those things, you are probably not going to do well in any system. If you have all of those things, you're not guaranteed success but it's certainly much more likely.
There's also a generational issue here. Entry level workers might be in their teens or twenties for a lot of jobs. Corporate executives are probably much older and have a lot more experience. In some cases you can start at the bottom and work up to the top. In other words, the 19-year-old who gets their first job at WalMart or the Disney store or wherever, could be in a very different position and earning a very different salary 30 years later.
Last word goes to Robby Soave who highlighted this clip on X, which is how I saw it. I do think he's on to something here.
This is just abjectly false from beginning to end. What she's doing here is trying to provide a moral justification for mass wealth confiscation, since in her view it is never earned legitimately. https://t.co/xfr4LVWcgA— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) May 7, 2026
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Why is she babbling on and on ?
Pure projection. Cortez only believes that because a drunken whore of bartender with a double-digit IQ certainly cannot earn a billion dollars - because even her blown-out, janky vagina would shred at those volumes.
It’s not like stealing from the Tip Jar.
The socialist bartender has been on the ketamine for over a year. Could explain a few things.
Maybe she can instruct us all next about how it’s possible to parlay a $175,000 per yr salary into a net worth of millions in about 8 yrs. I’d love to know the tricks she used.
RE: Maybe she can instruct us all next about how it’s possible to parlay a $175,000 per yr salary into a net worth of millions in about 8 yrs.
Where’s the report for this?
I haven’t quite earned a billion dollars. At least not yet. I’m looking for a part time gig. Might try driving a uber car.
One thing for certain —-AOC won’t ever earn a billion dollars. Not in USA anyway. Not with her horrid attitudes about Americans. But if she could run her big mouth at a lower speed, she maybe might could earn minimum wage at some unskilled job somewhere.
She is another example of a dangerous combination of ignorance and arrogance.
So LeBron James is worth a Billion Bucks—is he evil?
True.
And that Tony Robbins line: “Some people have confidence without competence.”
Lots of Dems and the media talkers like that.
Think Joy Reid, Rachel Maddow, Jen Psaki and the View panelists as they proclaim.
millions in increased wealth on a 174k salary
that is unearned
Did she share how she made her millions?
I was amazed that Communist China allows business leaders to become wealthy. Sounds like our system.
AOC and Mamdani would curtail and discourage anyone in the US from being the next Elon Musk.
South China Morning Post said:
Under China’s current socialist market economy, individuals are allowed and encouraged to get rich, provided their wealth generation aligns with state goals, follows legal channels, and contributes to the “common prosperity” initiative. The system focuses on entrepreneurs in strategic sectors, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, while shifting focus away from excessive wealth through property or unchecked corporate profit.
While the initial “let some people get rich first” approach created immense wealth, current policy aims to prevent this from becoming an “unbridgeable gulf”.
The state supports entrepreneurs who work hard, operate legally, and take risks, particularly in key tech sectors (AI, robotics) that fuel China’s strategic independence.
Regulating “Excessive” Income: The government regulates high incomes, investigates hidden or illegal income, and is considering taxes to level the playing field.
There has been a policy shift towards “Tide-Riders”— Newer, younger, and tech-driven wealth being welcomed more than traditional, ostentatious property-based wealth.
china is practicing fascism
Sure! That’s TRIGGER.
Mr. Ed!
Get her to a learing center!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.