Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/02/2026 8:45:17 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie
A Pakistani boy is among three people arrested over an anti-Semitic firebomb attack in north London.
Four ambulances owned by a Jewish charity were set on fire outside a synagogue in Golders Green in the early hours of March 23.
A 17-year-old boy with dual British and Pakistani nationality was arrested in east London on Wednesday.
Two more British nationals – a 20-year-old man and a 19-year-old man – were arrested in the same area.
All three were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life. They were taken to a London police station, where they remain in custody.
Counter-terror police are leading the investigation into the arson amid fears that it may have been orchestrated by Iran.
Two other men, aged 45 and 47 and both British nationals, were detained at addresses in north-west and central London last week on suspicion of arson with intent to endanger life. They were later released on bail.
(Snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
“… Two more British nationals – a 20-year-old man and a 19-year-old man – were arrested in the same area.…”
********************************************************
“British national” does NOT mean they are ethnic native Brits. And it does NOT mean that they non-Muslims. And it does NOT mean that they ARE NOT descendants of Pakistani immigrants to Britain.
IMHO Pakistanis are the worst people on this planet and that includes their diaspora.
Hallelujah! At least they didn’t say “Asians”.
A 17 year-old is not a “boy”.
True. They use the boys for suicide bombers.
My first reaction as well. I very clearly remember being 17. I was definitely not a ‘boy’.
100%
I think that a 17-year-old could, under certain circumstances, still be legitimately described as a "boy."
But if that "boy" has made certain choices, undergone certain live experiences, and reached certain life stages, he no longer qualifies as a "boy."
In my book, fire-bombing a synagogue clearly demonstrates that he is no longer a "boy."
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.