Posted on 03/31/2026 10:48:41 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
Yes, Elon Musk's first wife, Justine Musk (née Wilson), demanded equity stakes in his companies during their contentious 2008–2010 divorce proceedings, including 10% of his Tesla shares and 5% of his SpaceX shares.Reuters
Contemporary reporting from 2010 confirms this. A Reuters article from May 2010 stated that Justine wanted "10 percent of her husband's stake in the carmaker [Tesla]" along with "5 percent of his stake in space exploration company, SpaceX," plus alimony/child support, $6 million, and a Tesla Roadster. Similar details appeared in other outlets at the time, noting her push to rescind a post-nuptial agreement that limited her claims on community property (beyond their house).Reuters +1
Later accounts, including a 2025 Forbes article, align with this: Justine sought the family home, child support, $6 million in cash, a glacier-blue Tesla Roadster, 10% of Elon's Tesla shares, and 5% of his SpaceX shares. Elon reportedly countered with a cash settlement offer equivalent to about $80 million pre-tax (which she declined, preferring equity in the then-young companies Tesla and SpaceX). The court ultimately upheld the post-nup, and she received significantly less—no equity stakes in either company. Had she gotten the full requested package, Forbes estimated she could be worth around $17 billion today.Forbes
Justine herself detailed the broader divorce in her 2010 Marie Claire essay "I Was a Starter Wife," focusing on the marriage dynamics, the post-nup she signed early on, and the legal fight, but she didn't frame the equity demands as the central story there. Elon, in a 2010 Business Insider post, described offering more than double the post-nup amount and noted her insistence on ownership in Tesla and SpaceX.Businessinsider
In short, while the query mentions "5% of Tesla," the documented demand was actually 10% of Tesla (plus the 5% SpaceX). The 5% figure for Tesla doesn't appear in primary sources from the time or reliable retellings—it's likely a mix-up with the SpaceX portion. The divorce was messy, involved attempts to void the post-nup on fiduciary grounds, and ended with Justine receiving cash/assets (roughly $20 million post-tax equivalent, including the house and support) but no company equity. Tesla went public in 2010 amid the proceedings, adding to the stakes.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Musk and Tiger Woods should have studied the Derek Jeter model. Raise hell while you’re single. Then if you just have too. Get married and settle down. I’d just like to have 5 shares of SpaceX when it goes public.
Musk never went to Epstein Island.
What in the hell did she do to deserve 5% of Tesla?
Married Musk.
Had 5 kids with him.
And that saved him 20 billion.
Elon should think long and hard before ever getting married.
“Elon should think long and hard before ever getting married.”
Yes , and then decide to not get married !
There is a lot more to marriage than just
a generally safe supply of sex.
Most women can’t handle it.
As evidenced by the percentage
that divorce. Most divorces are
initiated by women.
My mother was divorced 4 times
and estranged from her 5th husband.
As a very involved observer, I saw no
reason for her divorces.
One thing it taught me was what kind
of woman to avoid.
Been Married nearly 49 years to
the same woman now.
We fight like cats and dogs sometimes
but, we never cross “The line”.
What is the line?
We are both equals
I need and love her,
she has the same
respect for me.
Nobody is the “Boss”.
I’m not pussy whipped
and she is not
“Dominated” by any means.
That is how marriage works;
I depend and respect her strengths,
She respects and sometimes
defers to mine.
Marriage is compromise, not
confrontation.
Safe sex is also GOOD!
There is also legal precedent (in some States) for romantic partners and dissolution of the partnerships - palimony.
And you wonder why “Men Going Their Own Way” is happening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XPjr3qjJ-w
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.