Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/14/2026 5:24:24 AM PDT by MikelTackNailer
A month into the partial government shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — thanks in no small part to separating DHS funding from the rest of the government combined with an unwillingness to address Senate filibuster rules — there have been two Islamist terror attacks on U.S. soil in Austin, Texas and New York City as the war in Iran rages on.
Founded in 2002 in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 by al Qaeda, who boarded jets to fly them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security’s purposes were set forth in the Homeland Security Act of 2002, to “prevent terrorist attacks within the United States; … reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism; … [and] minimize the damage, and assist in the recovery, from terrorist attacks that do occur within the United States…”
But right now, the Department is mostly unfunded, impacting not just DHS’ explicit counterterrorism mission, but also the Coast Guard, the Secret Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). The resulting staff shortages at these critical transportation hubs have already produced hours-long security lines, and without a quick resolution flights will face mounting delays and possible cancellations.
Democrats would like to hold it up because they want to defund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol to undermine President Donald Trump’s policies that deport illegal aliens and secure the southern border pursuant to federal law.
And so, Democrats’ latest proposal is to once again isolate funding, this time within the Department itself — that is, fund everything but ICE and the Border Patrol, so Democrats can run out the clock on the fiscal year. In the meantime, ICE and Border Patrol are two of the agencies that received additional funds in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and so were paid during the last shutdown and are getting paid during the current shutdown.
In other words, the agencies Democrats’ are targeting for defunding are already fully funded, and so the partial shutdown simply impacts all of the other agencies of the Department.
Democrats are pursuing this strategy precisely because it is actually harmless — to them. With ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection already fully funded through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, they don’t have to get their hands dirty by casting a direct vote to gut border enforcement.
Instead, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) can effectively carve those agencies out, let the rest of DHS (TSA, counterterrorism, etc.) twist in the wind, creating public inconveniences at airports and blame it all on President Trump — and quietly run down the extra funds Congressional Republicans and Trump fought for in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
It’s a long game. Democrats are planning on winning the House in the November Congressional midterms, and so by the time they get around to crafting legislation, the extra funds for Homeland Security will be exhausted sooner than originally planned.
All of which might have been avoided by consolidating DHS with the rest of the government’s funding, which ceded much of the leverage Republicans would have had in a full shutdown scenario.
Congress didn’t even separate all twelve appropriations bills. Instead, there were still three consolidated minibuses: 1) H.R. 6938 that funded the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Science Foundation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects, the Department of Energy, the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Forest Service and the Indian Health Service; 2) H.R. 7148 that funded the Department of Defense, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of the Treasury, the Executive Office of the President, the judiciary, the District of Columbia, the Department of State and related programs, the administration and oversight of foreign assistance programs, bilateral economic assistance, international security assistance, multilateral assistance and export and investment assistance; and 3) H.R. 5371 that funded the Department of Agriculture, the legislative Branch, military construction and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Those all became law on Jan. 23, Feb. 3 and Nov. 12, 2025, respectively. DHS funding was separated from what became H.R. 7148 following the death of Renee Good who was shot after she drove her vehicle into an ICE officer in Minnesota on Jan. 7.
That leaves President Trump and Congressional Republicans with a choice: Leave DHS shutdown entirely or just accept funding for all agencies except for ICE and Border Patrol, effectively allowing Democrats to drain the additional funds that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, about $140 billion, set up.
If Republicans cave, it will drain about $28 billion of the extra funds they had added to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act: $10 billion for ICE and $18 billion for Border Patrol that is currently being blocked in the DHS funding bill. Instead those funds have to come out of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s funding — because Republicans allowed DHS funding to be separated in the first place.
Democrats are up in almost all of the generic Congressional ballot polls by an average of 4.7 points, and so there’s no pressure publicly for them to work with the President to secure the border or remove illegal aliens. That equation did not change in the slightest during the last government full government shutdown last year, the longest in history. They’re not paying a political price.
Now, all Democrats have to do is run out the clock on the fiscal year, the extra funds get drained, get to September 30, shut down the government again, and then after the elections in November, just do nothing, let the Republican majority in the House run out of time and then push their further demands in January, which undoubtedly could result in further drain downs of what was supposed to be additional funding for border security and deportations.
Democrats won’t fund the Department of Homeland Security because they don’t think they need to — because Republicans gave away almost all of their leverage. Now, there’s just long lines at the airport, and Democrats believe they won’t be blamed until the polls tell them otherwise.
Robert Romano is the Executive Director of Americans for Limited Government.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
"Department of State and related programs, the administration and oversight of foreign assistance programs, bilateral economic assistance, international security assistance, multilateral assistance and export and investment assistance"
Most of which sounds like stuff Elon's DOGE crew missed.
That Schmuck Tumor plans to hold DHS and border patrol hostage until he gets his way is just one more reason the SAVE America Act is needed to strip the Dems of power.
I wonder if this allows the administration to remove security for politicians, judges, etc. Budgets, you know?
How in the hell are the schiffheadscum Dems running things ?!!
I think this will backfire on the Dims. Once airport lines get to extra hours the Dims will be blamed for it since they caused the shutdown.
This is when President Trump should put the entire Demonrat Party on the NO FLY list
I suppose it’s all about the filibuster. The Republicans are in the majority, but the Democrats can threaten a filibuster in the Senate to grind things to a halt.
The Senate gets to make its own rules. So the filibuster can be eliminated. If the Democrats regain control of the Senate, I wouldn’t be surprised if they simply got rid of the filibuster to make the GOP helpless.
> Once airport lines get to extra hours the Dims will be blamed for it since they caused the shutdown. <
That all depends on what news sources those folks are listening to. The leftist news sources will blame Republicans in general and Trump in particular. Their listeners will believe it.
Propaganda works.
Spoiler alert: the Democrats will definitely get back in power, and the Democrats will definitely remove the filibuster, and they will definitely do some crazy stuff.
The gutless cowards GOP refuses to fight which is why I finally left that worthless party.
“I think this will backfire on the Dims. Once airport lines get to extra hours the Dims will be blamed for it since they caused the shutdown.”
I live in a blue area, and I observe that the people around here blame Trump, completely. It’s what their TVs told them.
Dems continue to reject GOP efforts to fund ICE in DHS fight despite terror concerns: ‘That’s on them’
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-continue-reject-gop-efforts-fund-ice-dhs-fight-terror-concerns
Either the filibuster should be made part of the Constitution, or it should be eliminated and all the legislation Trump needs to do a proper job should be enacted.
Two Republicans could drop a bill in the hoppers proposing a filibuster constitutional amendment be sent to the states with a 05/30/2026 limit for ratification.
They've been the predominant force in central government for decades due to the entrenched bureaucracy who really run everything being over 90% Democrat itself. Obama added to this problem by replacing conservatives and independent-minded people with "true believers" in some areas on a large scale: Muslims in State, party loyalists in AG and Communists in the courts.
The office drones eagerly comply with the leftist agenda of their party but delay or just ignore that of conservative administrations wherever they can get away with it. Politicians learn to legislate with a mindset toward not agitating the Beltway Beehive too much if they want to get anything meaningful passed.
And that's how and why Democrat politicians behave as if they're in charge no matter what the numerical balance may be. The "machine" is a powerful motorcycle when they ride it; a beat-up minibike when it's the Republicans' turn.
The Algerians got their unwanted guests to leave in the early 1960s.
Trump should never signed that last CR without that funding, pure and simple, but once again the GOP caved.
You constantly impress me how you see a problem and construct very detailed solutions to them. All that problem-solving while disregarding feelings would make you one piss-poor Democrat - not to mention tough on dating (in my experience).
Seriously though, I’d LOVE to have the vocal filibuster on this bill just to make them draw straws to see who’ll tell the American people why they shouldn’t be reelected. Having nothing better than “Jim Crow 2.0” and “maiden name-changers disenfranchised” and other fairy tales to run on the Democrats would be exposed as the lying traitorous criminals they are.
Some have hope that President of the Senate Vance may be able to solve it, but I don’t see that actually possible. There IS the option of five senators moving for change of leadership (which is a rule and not Constitutional anyway).
Republicans will get blamed regardless- they’re in power and don’t know how to fight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.