Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/24/2026 6:45:38 AM PST by CFW
The Supreme Court will be releasing opinions from the October 2025 term this morning at 10:00 a.m.
Scotusblog will be liveblogging the release and we will be following along.
A list of the cases from this term can be found Here
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
We may get one boring opinion or several interesting ones. It's like a box of chocolates.
Just depends how much bribe money the foreign powers and elite have left from the previous tariffs rulings as to which way these rulings will go.
Please prove your outlandish statement
SCOTUS ping!
Only one box of opinions today. Could be several smaller opinions or one big one.
We have the first opinion, in Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist. It is by Sotomayor and is unanimous, although Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
This case involved a thorny question of civil procedure. If a plaintiff files a case against two corporations in a state trial court, and one of those companies transfers the case to federal court, where the other company is then dismissed from the case, what happens if a federal appeals court later determines – after the trial is over – that the second company should have stayed in the case? Does the plaintiff get a do-over back in state court?
Totally agree. Dirty court
Also known as the babyfood case.
The court vacates the district court’s judgment for lack of jurisdiction.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-724_igdj.pdf
We have the second and final decision of the day. It is United States Postal Service v. Konan, from Justice Thomas.
And my internet connection just went south so I can’t see anymore info on the case.
Roberts rules Obamacare was a tax allowing congress to force everyone to buy a thing, even when congress literally said it was never a tax. Then Roberts rules Trump can’t use IEEPA after previous presidents used it frequently, See SC Thomas’s dissent.
That is my proof this court is bought.
the Barbarian?
The Birthright Citizenship issue should be coming up in the near future.
I’m with Trump on that one:
“Trump Predicts Supreme Court ‘Will Find a Way to Come to the Wrong Conclusion’ on Birthright Citizenship’”
— Gateway Pundit.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf
This is, as the name might suggest, a dispute over mail service – specifically, when the USPS can be sued over undelivered mail. It was brought by a Texas woman who contends that she was the victim of a “campaign of racial harassment” at the hands of two employees at her local post office.
She sued (among others) the USPS and the US under the Federal Tort Claims Act, a law that waives the government’s general sovereign immunity from lawsuits. The FTCA contains an exception that leaves immunity in place for claims “arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matters.” The USPS contends that this exception applies to Lebene Konan’s case. Konan contends that it does not, because the intentional mistreatment of her mail was not a “loss” or “miscarriage.”
The court holds that the FTCA’s postal exception DOES apply when postal workers intentionally fail to deliver the mail.
The majority says that it does “not decide whether all of Konan’s claims are barred by the postal exception, or which arguments Konan adequately preserved.”
Justice Sotomayor writes that the majority’s “reading of the postal exception transforms, rather than honors, the exception Congress enacted.”
When exactly did Congress say ObamaCare was not a tax?
The ACA individual mandate was absolutely enforced through the Internal Revenue Service, through the filing of Forms 1094 or 1095. How is that NOT a tax?
I also had thoughts on what they just did with Trump’s tariffs....hope USPS can be better held to account it has really gone downhill
This is all I will say because you will lie about everything.
Literally to get it passed the democrats swore up and down it was a penalty, not a tax, in fact the rules they used to force it through did not allow the process for tax changes. They kept saying it was not a tax so citizens would not be upset at being taxed for it.
If you do not remember this that is your problem, go look it up.
Most everybody has opinions.
An unwelcome outcome is not proof. Conspiracy minded, maybe. Proof, no. And not even close.
Can you imagine that the Left wants elections done by postal mail, but also wants to protect the USPS against *deliberately* failing to deliver mail based on known, identified prejudices?
“Can you imagine that the Left wants elections done by postal mail, but also wants to protect the USPS against *deliberately* failing to deliver mail based on known, identified prejudices?”
Feature, not a bug.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.