Posted on 02/04/2026 2:39:39 PM PST by CedarDave
In a move critics are calling reckless, ideologically driven, and economically devastating, New Mexico Democrats have fast-tracked House Bill 9, the so-called “Immigrant Safety Act”—through the Legislature and toward the governor’s desk, setting the stage for what opponents warn could be mass job losses, municipal insolvency, and a collapse of rural economies in Otero County, Torrance County, and Cibola County.
The bill cleared the Senate late Tuesday night on a 24–15, near party-line vote after hours of heated debate. The House had already passed the measure earlier in the session after a lengthy debate led by Rep. John Block (R-Alamogordo), who offered an amendment to make counties whole that was narrowly defeated. Rural communities are now having to brace for impact.
HB 9 bans local governments from contracting with the federal government to operate Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities, prohibits renewals of existing agreements, and bars the use of public property for federal immigration detention. Supporters framed the bill as a moral stand against what they described as a “cruel” federal immigration system. But even lawmakers who oppose ICE policies acknowledged the bill’s severe economic consequences.
“This is going to devastate my community,” warned Sen. Ant Thornton, R-Sandia Park, whose district includes the Torrance County Detention Facility. Thornton unsuccessfully offered an amendment that would have reimbursed counties for lost taxes, jobs, and economic activity. “Estancia is going to turn into a ghost town,” he said.
Sen. George Muñoz, D-Gallup, whose district includes Cibola County, voted against the bill and issued an even starker warning. “You want to see a town dry up like a tumbleweed and blow away—get ready,” Muñoz said, calling Grants a town “built on prisons.” He added, “We have to figure out how we’re going to help these people… and now it’s going to disappear.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pinonpost.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
New Mexico ... Land of Disenchantment ... is lost :-(

NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, you may be allowed a number of free article views.)
And this performance art will be overturned by a federal court (at least one without a partisan hack Dem judge) as soon as it hits the docket as being preempted by federal law.
Fine, then they leave us the 2nd option: no detention, just pack them in buses sent straight back to the mexican border
Last I knew there were at least 3 USAF bases and 1 maybe 2 ANG facilities in NM. And I hear White Sands Missile Range is a nice place in the summer.
Link to ABQ Journal story:
Sure. But the state people have to pretend they have some power so they look tough. If only they knew how ridiculous they look.
Too bad, so sad; I guess they forgot that the Feds own 24 million acres of New Mexico that they could put a really, really big, bigger biggest, detention facility on.
So the employees at each facility should form their own corporation & take the contract from the feds & rent the facilities from the counties. Problem solved. ;-)
Trump should close the Sante Fe National forest and store the illegals there in a giant tent city.
Ski Sante Fe has a large parking lot that can be used.
Make Sante Fe pay with its pocket book.
Or transport them all to Gitmo to stay there until their court date comes up in 3-5 years. Do the same thing with the protestors.
About 32% of NM land is federal.
They think they can do things they can’t do. 😅
Well the immigrants must be safe at all costs.
Move everything to border states who need these funds and employment.
“Immigrant Safety Act”. Ummm … if there here LEGALLY that’s not necessary.
So who are you protecting Democrats? Certainly not people living here, just your gravy train of fraud.
“HB 9 bans local governments from contracting with the federal government to operate Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities”
i don’t see the problem here: it would appear that ONLY local governments are prohibited from the contracts, which leaves every other corporation and non-new-mexico government in the USA available for contracting ...
should NM also attempt to disallow private contractors or use of private property as detention centers, the Feds could always apply eminent domain and buy said facilities at fair market values and make them Federal property ... so, Sayonara to NM government ...
apparently the problem is that several poor counties of NM will go bankrupt without the contracting revenue from the Feds, but hey, sacrificing a few poor counties here or there seems to be worth the price to pay for meaningless virtue signaling ...
ya’ll keep voting for Democrats, ya’ hear!
call them Hotels or Resorts ,LOL
Meaningless. The federal government owns a huge chunk of New Mexico, and the state has no say about what happens there. National Forest, BLM, military bases, etc..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.