Posted on 01/14/2026 9:06:12 PM PST by lasereye
The explosion of the budget deficit was one of the most worrisome things that happened post-Covid. While inflation peaked in 2022, the deficit kept getting worse because of the “fiscal doom loop” caused by bloated spending and higher interest rates.
At this time last year things were still looking extremely grim. The deficit was stuck around $2.1 trillion on a rolling 12-month basis, or 7.3% of GDP--the largest non-emergency deficit we’ve ever had. And the10-year Treasury yield was stuck above 4.7%, worsening the situation daily. Now, though, we are experiencing a dramatic improvement.
The latest numbers which we got yesterday afternoon illustrate the sharp change we’ve seen. For the first three months of the fiscal year (October through December), the deficit is down $109 billion, or 15% from a year earlier. Tariff revenues, known as “customs receipts,” are a big part of that, hitting $90 billion from $20 billion the prior year.
The market had been anticipating some improvement, as we wrote last summer. The 10-year Treasury yield even dipped below 4% briefly in the fall. The question now is how long this improvement can last. Tariff revenues already appear to be plateauing at around $30 billion a month. And the “One Big Beautiful Bill” is expected to increase the deficit in the months ahead.
“Spending is not budging,” writes Dan Clifton of Strategas, a Baird company. It’s still around 23% of GDP, versus 20% historically, he notes. It’s because income tax receipts (along with tariffs) have been stronger than expected this year that the deficit has been improving. “Without spending coming down, it’s hard to get the deficit from 6% to 3% of GDP,” he says.
And perhaps that’s why interest rates haven’t been able to fall much further lately. Remember--everything the president wants to achieve with his housing affordability push would be much easier if the 10-year Treasury yield, which mortgage rates are priced off of, fell considerably. Even Fed rate cuts don’t lower this rate, as we’ve seen over the past year.
And as much as the White House has been pointing the finger at the Federal Reserve to bring down rates, many analysts are pointing the finger right back at the White House for keeping rates elevated.
Why? “The only path to sustained lower market interest rates is through price stability, central bank credibility, and fiscal integrity,” wrote Roth MKM’s Michael Darda this week. “Undermining central bank independence, and squandering tariff revenue on fiscal gimmicks is likely to do just the opposite.”
So yes, the deficit looks much better lately, and thank goodness. But for all of the DOGE drama, lowering spending is the one true change this administration hasn’t been able to deliver on yet.
See you at 1 p.m!
Kelly
Twitter: @KellyCNBC
Instagram: @realkellyevans
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Giving out those $2,000 tariff dividend checks is probably not fiscally wise. I assume President Trump wants to do it to help Republicans in the midterms. He's kind of taking a page out of the Democrat playbook.
“lowering spending is the one true change this administration hasn’t been able to deliver on yet.”
Lowering fraudulent spending is the best kind of lowering spending.
Doesn’t take a genius to know this.
I prefer where the National debt was in 1828. Zero. It only happened once in American history. The problem is systemic. Congressmen don’t get reelected based on how much spending they have cut.
So yes, the deficit looks much better lately, and thank goodness. But for all of the DOGE drama, lowering spending is the one true change this administration hasn’t been able to deliver on yet.
Adding to these counter arguments is the threat that the Supreme Court at any day might hand down a decision that declared Trump's tariff policies unconstitutional and in a single stroke do away with all the deficit reduction that tariffs have produced this year.
One more thing to note, it is true the Trump is not focused on cutting spending, he never has. His plan is to grow the economy out of deficits and to stimulate growth through cutting regulations cutting taxes and restoring manufacturing by way of tariffs.
No tariffs no deficit reductions.
True, has made his hill a little steeper to climb with the "squandering tariff revenue on fiscal gimmicks," but one has to take into account the dysfunctional nature of Congress and the fixed determination of voters to avoid any austerity whatsoever.
“Giving out those $2,000 tariff dividend checks is probably not fiscally wise. I assume President Trump wants to do it to help Republicans in the midterms. He’s kind of taking a page out of the Democrat playbook.”
————
I would agree, if we lived in a vacuum. But we don’t. The alternative is to have Democrats recapture the house and not only completely shut down any kind of legislation that Trump would want, including spending cuts, but they will impeach him if he breathes. It is far cheaper in the long run to spend money to essentially bribe voters for this one election than it is to allow the Democrats to win the midterms.
Wasn’t that W’s playbook? Helicopter money. Would be better to add a “tariff deduction” on taxes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.