Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Minneapolis shooting: That settles it
Washington Examiner ^ | 1/11/2026 | Byron York

Posted on 01/12/2026 4:06:05 AM PST by jurroppi1

Although the argument goes on, the video of the Minneapolis shooting taken by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who shot Renee Good effectively answered the question of whether the agent, Jonathan Ross, acted lawfully. The video, and other evidence as well, suggests that he did.

"Regardless of whether you believe Renee Good's death resulted from either her poor decision-making in gratuitously courting danger, or Trump's excessive zeal in ramping up immigration enforcement, the legal case comes down to whether the agent reasonably perceived a potentially lethal threat," wrote former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "From what we have seen so far, he did.”

"Regardless of whether you believe Renee Good's death resulted from either her poor decision-making in gratuitously courting danger, or Trump's excessive zeal in ramping up immigration enforcement, the legal case comes down to whether the agent reasonably perceived a potentially lethal threat," wrote former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "From what we have seen so far, he did.”

Ross is highly unlikely to face any sort of federal prosecution over the incident. But that does not mean that officials in the state of Minnesota will see things the same way. "I've just been through enough of these cases where if there's a political agenda, then the law gets thrown to the side," Eric Nelson, the lawyer who defended Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis officer now jailed for the death of George Floyd, told the Daily Mail. "It is entirely possible that the federal system could say we're not going to indict [Ross], but the state could prosecute him for some form of homicide or manslaughter.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: demagogicparty; democratlawfare; lawfare; minneapolis; minnesota; reneegood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
Hard to believe there is meaningful MSM reporting on this, especially reposted on MSN of all places. There is good info in the rest of the article, hopefully it convinces some that need to be enlightened.
1 posted on 01/12/2026 4:06:05 AM PST by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

Poor Ross and his family????


2 posted on 01/12/2026 4:08:13 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Not sure what you mean by your comment with multiple question marks at the end.
I'd say he (Ross) and his family still face a long, tough road ahead with MN politics the way they are and the way they pursue agenda-driven prosecutions.
3 posted on 01/12/2026 4:23:43 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

I’m interested in the trajectory of the fatal bullet.
In order to strike the deceased woman, the round had to enter the passenger compartment of the car.
What route did it follow? Was it fired from the front of the car and penetrated the windshield, or could it have been fired from the driver’s left side? Where did the bullet strike her? I’ve literally seen dozens of head-shots.
Except for a few cases, it was easy to determine from what direction the shot was fired.
If, as my neighbor adamantly claims, the officer fired through the driver’s window (whether it was up or down doesn’t matter), then the immediate threat to him no longer existed. That would mean the car was on its way out of the zone and the threat to the officer was over.


4 posted on 01/12/2026 4:26:24 AM PST by ComputerGuy (FAFO is known as the Trump Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

I don t know if you’re right or wrong, but I do know you don’t have time to rationalize like that when a car is pointed at you, especially if you’ve been seriously hurt by a similar incident in the past. And she DID taunt and hit him. So he’s supposed to take nano seconds to rationalize? I don’t think so.


5 posted on 01/12/2026 4:31:16 AM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Just look at the photos showing the aftermath of the crash. The bullet hole in the windshield is your first clue. The second bullet hole in the driver’s side view mirror is your second clue.


6 posted on 01/12/2026 4:31:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

Free Derek Chauvin! He was railroaded by a kangaroo court.


7 posted on 01/12/2026 4:34:19 AM PST by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


8 posted on 01/12/2026 4:34:19 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
If, as my neighbor adamantly claims, the officer fired through the driver’s window (whether it was up or down doesn’t matter), then the immediate threat to him no longer existed. That would mean the car was on its way out of the zone and the threat to the officer was over.

Even if that were the case, imagine if instead of the car she used a gun. Would her firing a gun at the agent and missing, then turning her side to him, prevent the agent from lawfully shooting her to prevent her from using her weapon on the people she was later aiming at? Keep in mind that in one camera angle there's another agent in front of her car that she was heading toward after she missed the first agent.

9 posted on 01/12/2026 4:35:47 AM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

OMG!! I meant to put !!!!!!!! Thanks for that.<P<Poor Ross and his family!!!! They will be targeted now.


10 posted on 01/12/2026 4:35:53 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

Cops have a saying: a split second to make a life or death decision and then all eternity for monday morning quarterbacks to pick it apart.

CC


11 posted on 01/12/2026 4:38:45 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo; All

First of all, I’m asking - not claiming, what happened.
I can’t tell from the video.
Unlike the other 99.9999% on this forum, I have actually been there and done that.


12 posted on 01/12/2026 4:42:20 AM PST by ComputerGuy (FAFO is known as the Trump Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

” but the state could prosecute him for some form of homicide or manslaughter.”

Other lawyers have said that can’t happen, due to the Supremacy Clause and he was working as a Federal employee at the time of the incident.

Imagine being that man, doing your job as you were trained to do, and then looking over your shoulder waiting for LEOs to show up and take you away.

Like Derek Chauvin. Doing his job as trained. Now cooling his heels in prison.

As my Sunday School teacher said, “That ain’t right”.


13 posted on 01/12/2026 4:43:36 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ( "Trouble knocked at the door, but, hearing laughter, hurried away". - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

Tim Walz signed this in 2020.
Statute 609.066 addresses use of deadly force by a peace officer & states the intentional discharge of a firearm in the direction of another person or at a vehicle occupied by another person constitutes deadly force. And emphasizes that peace officers should only use deadly force when necessary to defend human life or prevent great bodily harm.


14 posted on 01/12/2026 4:46:01 AM PST by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

If a puke like Andy Boy can’t find a way to blame the officer this was a very clear shoot.


15 posted on 01/12/2026 4:53:33 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

No, it does not.

They’re still telling lies, leftists, democrat politicians, etc.

And the media is reporting said lies.

No accountability.


16 posted on 01/12/2026 4:57:24 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 "/!i!! &@$%&*(@ -')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

“the immediate threat to him no longer existed”

The video shows her steering right. That doesn’t mean she couldn’t then steer left.

I’m trying to think of a parallel with a gun. The robber leaves the bank. He has a gun. The gun barrel is pointed down. He is repeatedly told to drop the gun and refuses. He looks at a policeman, acquiring a target. Next?


17 posted on 01/12/2026 4:58:48 AM PST by ChessExpert (Infidels of the world unite against the evil that is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

Sell MN to the Canucks, it's been messed up for the last half of a century. Two less senators and house members to boot.

18 posted on 01/12/2026 5:00:23 AM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
If you change bank to liquor store, I can tell you what happens.
19 posted on 01/12/2026 5:01:46 AM PST by ComputerGuy (FAFO is known as the Trump Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
then the immediate threat to him no longer existed

Thats not how it works. Thats not how case law has asserted how a law enforcement officer should react. Thats also not how the use of force continuum has ever worked when it comes to cars ramming/running over law enforcement.

You sound like the average leftist on social media thats trying to sound reasonable but really only wants to spew their preconceived narrative.
20 posted on 01/12/2026 5:23:49 AM PST by brent13a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson