Posted on 12/19/2025 4:14:22 PM PST by CFW
Chaos erupted in a King County courtroom on Thursday during the high-profile Mays v. City of Seattle wrongful death trial, as city attorney Alexandra Nica launched into a furious tirade, accusing opposing counsel Evan Oshan of "gender discrimination and harassment." The outburst came on the heels of devastating expert testimony that painted Seattle's handling of the infamous 2020 CHAZ/CHOP zone as liable for the June 2020 "agonizing" death of Antonio Mays Jr., a black teenager from California shot several times in the protest zone.
As the testimony piled up against Seattle, Nica appeared increasingly unhinged. In an emotional rant without jurors present, she complained that Oshan refuses to speak to her, turns his chair away, and ignores her questions—insisting this "only happens to me" because she's a woman. She demanded that Judge Sean O'Donnell enforce prior sanctions against Oshan for alleged "gender conduct." But Oshan wasn't having it and flipped the script. He shot back, exposing Nica's own hypocritical attacks: "Throughout this litigation, Ms. Nica has attacked me on the basis of my gender. She has called me a 'mansplainer' multiple times in court documents...She called me a 'boar.'"
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostmillennial.com ...
The attorney for the Mays family wasn't having it and flipped the script.
As a side note, it's amazing the number of FR threads that have the word "purple-haired" in the title. I added the term as a keyword.
It’s Trump bringing out the worst in them. The good news is our people are following but not enough.
Worse than Idiocracy.
Worse than Idiocracy.
It’s amazing the similarities of that movie and our culture today.
It sounds like an excerpt from a Kurt Schlicter novel about the division of our country into the United States, composed of normal people, and the Peoples Republic of North America (both coasts) populated by weirdos like this ... woman (?) who insist upon being called by the proper pronouns and spend a lot of time complaining about macro and microaggressions.
And his series is starting to sound more like a primer than a warning.
The 16 y/o (potential thief?) should not have been in that enclosed CHOP area in the first place. The Thugs in charge had closed it off to everyone not in their little group, even closed it off to Cops, if I recall correctly.
They were hard core heterosexual though. Fag was a slur in the movie.
That’s gotta hurt.
DEMAND a judge do something?
Good luck with that.
Grow up buttercup.
Geez, a double-dipper, purple and green. She could go off like a Roman Candle at any moment.
I can’t understand how she expects a judge and/or jury to take her seriously when this is how she presents herself in court.
Liberal women “We can do anything just as well as a man”. Followed by, “He criticized me! I think I’m going to cry!”
Are many lawyers peevish little people?
Why yes, yes they are.
Grounds for disbarment...
A proper response is to have the woman leave HIS court room and not return until the purple is removed from her hair.
It is a political statement.
Well for some reason I get a Medusa vibe so I wouldn’t look at her either. Haven’t turned to stone yet though. :)
Don’t you wish the judge would tell her to sit the hell down and shut the hell up?
But the term gender misconduct doesn’t make sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.