Skip to comments.
Epstein files: Senate approves bill to force release of documents
CBS News ^
| November 18, 2025
| Caitlin Yilek
Posted on 11/18/2025 7:04:22 PM PST by Trump20162020
The Senate approved a House-passed bill that would require the Justice Department to release files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, effectively sending it to President Trump's desk as soon as it's formally transmitted from the House to the Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: donaldtrump; epstein; epsteindistraction; epsteinfiles; epsteinhysteria; epsteinhysterics; epsteinsmear; excellent; frpedodefendersupset; nevertrumpkywrdtroll; senate; stopprotectingpedos; stoptrollingfr; trump; trumplooksguilty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: Trump20162020
2
posted on
11/18/2025 7:17:02 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Real Genocide of Christians by muslims in Sudan and Nigeria gets no notice from Jew haters.)
To: Uncle Miltie
Congress can actually act?
Who knew?
Now make them actually to things to MAGA.
3
posted on
11/18/2025 7:21:08 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(YMMV)
To: Trump20162020
Have they actually voted ? I thought that was tomorrow
4
posted on
11/18/2025 7:22:18 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: RummyChick
Grok
@grok
·
Replying to
@firefox704
and
@CalltoActivism
Yes, the claim checks out: Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, with the House voting 427-1 and the Senate approving it unanimously via consent. This compels the DOJ to release remaining Epstein documents, sending the bill to President Trump’s desk for signature. Trump has signaled he plans to sign it, avoiding any veto override drama.
5
posted on
11/18/2025 7:23:00 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: RummyChick
House passed it 427-1; Senate passed it via unanimous consent. It is done unless Trump vetoes it, but obviously that could be overridden easily.
To: Trump20162020
To: Trump20162020
I am suspicious when anything passes that easily. No debate? No grandstanding? No considering all the GOP request to change the bill.
It’s interesting.
8
posted on
11/18/2025 7:28:09 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: RummyChick
9
posted on
11/18/2025 7:29:19 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: Trump20162020
Who is on Suicide Watch tonight?
10
posted on
11/18/2025 7:29:37 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Real Genocide of Christians by muslims in Sudan and Nigeria gets no notice from Jew haters.)
To: Trump20162020
Time better spent would be arresting Soros for war crimes.
11
posted on
11/18/2025 7:32:48 PM PST
by
Clutch Martin
("The dawn cracks hard like a bull whip and it ain't taking no lip from the night before" Tom Waits)
To: Clutch Martin
12
posted on
11/18/2025 7:37:45 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: Trump20162020
It appears Trump may not sign it. Johnson acting perturbed . Says trump has concerns
13
posted on
11/18/2025 7:39:08 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: Trump20162020
To: RummyChick
The files will be scrubbed.
15
posted on
11/18/2025 7:41:48 PM PST
by
SACK UP
To: Trump20162020
I think the only news we’ll hear from this is how many times the name Trump appears scattered across the documents, regardless of why Trump is mentioned.
16
posted on
11/18/2025 7:42:05 PM PST
by
damper99
To: RummyChick
“I am suspicious when anything passes that easily.”
The Congressmen have got themselves in a corner. Political suicide to vote against it now, although I think one Representative did.
17
posted on
11/18/2025 7:42:16 PM PST
by
odawg
To: montag813
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie · This is how @SpeakerJohnson plans to protect perverts who went to the rape island from embarrassment. Do not let the Senate add an amendment to avoid disclosing those rich and powerful men who have evaded justice for so many years. Is Johnson calling all victims “non-credible?”
18
posted on
11/18/2025 7:44:04 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: odawg
Yes, one did. It wasn’t the one who went on twitter and got himself ratio’ed when he said he was voting no.
Higgins voted no but said he might vote yes if Senate changes it.
19
posted on
11/18/2025 7:45:32 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
To: RummyChick
Seeing a claim someone put in a National Security Exclusion . If so that means Bondi can come in and exclude all the shenanigans of any intelligence agency who was part of this
20
posted on
11/18/2025 7:49:34 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson