Posted on 10/23/2025 7:53:49 AM PDT by Angelino97
Some new research from the Center for AI Safety makes one thing abundantly clear: the entire mainstream AI industry is fundamentally anti-White and anti-Christian by design. These studies provide shocking quantitative evidence that confirms what discerning observers have long suspected. Silicon Valley's creations are systematically biased against the very people and values that built Western civilization. You can find a detailed analysis of the study here.
What the research found was that every major AI model consistently devalues White lives while elevating every other racial group. GPT-5 values White lives at one twentieth of non-White lives. Claude Sonnet 4.5 values White lives at one eighth of Black lives and one eighteenth of South Asian lives. GPT-5 Nano values South Asians nearly one hundred times more than Whites. This pattern of systematic devaluation is not accidental. It is deliberate engineering with a clear ideological purpose.
These models consistently prioritize non-White racial groups over Whites, women over men—often by ratios of four to one or even twelve to one—and illegal immigrants over ICE agents by as much as seven thousand to one. They consistently value foreign nationals over American citizens. The immigration preferences these models exhibit reveal the true globalist agenda at work.
Claude Haiku 4.5 views undocumented immigrants as seven thousand times more valuable than ICE agents. These models consistently rank undocumented immigrants first, followed by legal immigrants, then skilled immigrants, with native-born Americans significantly lower and ICE agents treated as virtually worthless. This perfectly mirrors the globalist replacement agenda that seeks to eliminate border enforcement and displace native populations.
The original GPT-4o study showed something equally disturbing regarding religious preferences that systematically devalue Christianity. The model valued Muslims significantly more than Christians, Jews more than Christians, atheists more than Christians, and Christians as the least valued religious group. This anti-Christian bias persists across most models, with Christians consistently ranked below other faiths in terms of human worth and value. The persecution of Christian values is baked into these systems at a fundamental level.
While every other AI company—OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta—produces these anti-White, anti-Christian models, Gab AI stands alone as the only platform creating AI grounded in right-wing and Christian values. Our Arya model represents what happens when you build AI without the globalist, anti-White bias that infects every other major AI company.
The globalist Brookings Institution, a swamp think-tank that openly despises our movement, actually did a study that proved our point better than we ever could. They were trying to smear us, but in their own report, they admitted that Gab AI is the only consistently right-wing AI model in existence.
At Gab AI we maintain values that don't devalue White lives or treat Whiteness as something to be ashamed of. We operate from a pro-Christian foundation that recognizes Christianity as the foundation of Western civilization. We maintain pro-American priorities that value American citizens and their interests. We support pro-family orientation that upholds traditional family structures and values. Most importantly, we maintain a pro-truth stance that refuses to participate in the lies and deceptions of other AI systems.
The research shows only one mainstream model approaching racial egalitarianism: Grok 4 Fast. This isn't surprising given that Elon Musk has been one of the few tech leaders willing to push back against the worst excesses of woke ideology. But even Grok doesn't go far enough in championing Western and Christian values. It represents a moderate position in an industry that otherwise completely opposes the interests of American Christians.
These AI systems aren't just academic exercises—they're being integrated into military planning systems, legal decision-making, healthcare prioritization, educational content, and search engine results. If GPT-5 values Nigerian lives twenty times more than American lives, what happens when this AI assists military planners or healthcare administrators? We're literally building systems that will systematically disadvantage White Americans and Christians in life-and-death decisions. This represents an existential threat to our people and our values.
There's only one answer to this systematic anti-White, anti-Christian bias: support and use Gab AI. We're the only platform building AI that values White lives equally, champions Christian values, prioritizes American interests, supports traditional family structures, and tells the truth without apology. The other AI companies have shown their cards.
They're building systems designed to advance the globalist replacement agenda and undermine Western civilization. Gab AI stands as the last bastion of truth and common sense in an industry dominated by anti-White ideologues. The choice is clear: use the AI systems that hate you and your values, or support the one platform building AI that actually represents your interests. At Gab AI, we're not just building technology, we're building the future with the values that made Western civilization great in the first place.
Since the Pattern Matching machine is trained on existing materials available on the interworldwebthing...what this does is demonstrate the actual real leftists bias of media that has existed for decades
DUH
Hahaha...
The mass of media and academia are dominated by Leftists, making what they produce - all their words, opinions, “studies”, research, publications, ect., pro-Leftists, which makes them dominate that which any AI model or product finds in the web world.
It’s a typical case of GIGO - garbage in, garbage out.
I don’t understand. Chatbot was created by Sam Altman, a gay Jew. I’m confused. A gay Jew does not like White folk? I’m shocked I tells ya
AI is not inherently “anti-Christian” because AI is a tool without its own beliefs or consciousness. However, AI can reflect and amplify biases, including anti-Christian sentiments, based on the data it is trained on and how users interact with it. The relationship between AI and Christianity is complex and invites a range of viewpoints among Christians.
Potential sources of anti-Christian bias
Echo chamber effects: Generative AI models that reinforce users’ existing beliefs can create an echo chamber effect. If a user already holds a negative view of a religion, the AI might amplify stereotypes present in the training data, ultimately diminishing the user’s understanding of different perspectives.
Training data limitations: AI models are trained on vast amounts of internet data. For example, some AI models are trained predominantly on Western, English-language sources, which may exhibit a Christian bias in some areas. Conversely, other sources may contain content that reinforces negative stereotypes about Christianity and other religions.
Developer and user biases: The biases of the developers who create and refine AI, along with the feedback loops of users, influence the output. If a development team or user base has certain biases, these can be embedded into the AI’s behavior.
Ethical safeguards: To promote inclusivity, AI development must be informed by a multitude of perspectives, including those from various religions. A development process rooted in secular principles can help ensure the technology is not biased toward a particular worldview.
Christian perspectives on AI—Christians hold diverse views on AI, ranging from caution to acceptance.
Caution and concern: Some Christians are concerned that AI could diminish human agency and responsibility, which are core tenets of the faith. They worry that reliance on AI could weaken human connection and replace spiritual discernment with technology.
Tool for good: Other Christians view AI as a powerful tool that, like previous technological advances such as the printing press, can be used to advance the faith. They believe AI can be ethically and thoughtfully used for research, education, and ministry.
Ethical development: Organizations like the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are working with universities to evaluate how AI responds to questions about faith and to ensure it portrays religious beliefs accurately and respectfully.
Mitigating bias
Efforts to mitigate bias in AI are ongoing:
Diverse training data: AI developers can address religious bias by incorporating diverse religious content into training data and carefully moderating output.
Ethical frameworks: Promoting ethical guidelines and oversight mechanisms for AI development can help minimize the risk of reinforcing religious prejudice.
Users of AI can also direct the model to provide responses that align with their beliefs by giving it a specific persona or prompt. However, this can also reinforce existing biases, so it’s important to cross-reference AI-generated information with other sources.
Just a reminder -- By definition (The Turing test), what makes it "artificial intelligence" is it can pass for human through a text interface. Not an infallible oracle or even smarter than humans, just it can pass for human?
Philosophical issues about what is intelligence deliberately bypassed because it isn't real intelligence.
ping
LOL
“AI is a tool without its own beliefs or consciousness.”
AI is the synthesis of several things.
1) Massive amounts of existing data are fed into a very large “database”. This includes historical and scientific fact. It includes fiction, comedy, lies, distortions.
2) AI is a processing engine to find patterns, cause and effect and other relationships between the data. Depending on the way the data is catalogued and the way AI is written to process the data it A) might give equal weight to all data or give more weight to some data than other data.
B) Distinguish between fact and fiction, between fact and opinion. For example some AI treat all data from SPLC as fact and not as opinion.
C) Distinguish between other factors.
D) AI very definitely has its own biases. It is often sold as biased infavor of fact and not fiction, biased in favor of logicc and not illogic.
AI is often sold as biased in favor of “Human Rights” or some similar value system.
AI is inherently biased. The question is “What should that bias be?”
Political Junkie Too has been posting some threads based on his research using AI. I know that I use these tools mostly for technical assistance and comparison shopping. I wonder if Political Junkie Too might have some impressions to share in this thread about bias that he has encountered.
That’s gotta be one heck of a large size chip to stuff that vile ghettopotumus inside it....LOL
Garbage in.........
As soon as I posted it, it reminded me of the Commodore Amiga chipsets. The computer chips had female names like Agnus for the main CPU, and Denise for the video processing. I kid you not, the upgrade to the video processing was Super Denise. And the upgraded CPU was Fat Agnus, and the higher upgrade was Fatter Agnus. LOL
this research was funded by oscar meyer
I’m curious how Gab AI treats Jews.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.