Posted on 10/01/2025 9:25:37 AM PDT by bitt
I remember living in New York City decades ago when I saw ads suggesting that we straight white devils "tolerate" the gay crowd. Then we were pressured to "accept" them.
As a liberal in the Big Apple, I thought this was a waste of social pressure. New York City was and is as gay-friendly as a San Francisco bathhouse. But the truth is, tolerance and acceptance were never going to be enough. Nor was that even the goal.
The Supreme Court (no, not President Barack Obama) legalized gay marriage ten years ago. Rather than take an expected victory lap, the LGBTFBI crew immediately began to push for the "right" of men in dresses to relieve themselves in the ladies' room, lest they get beaten to a pulp by toxically masculine chawbacons while standing at a urinal. We were assured that transgender folks were peaceful.
Again, we were asked to "tolerate." Again, we did. And again, the goalposts were moved.
In 10 years, we went from "tolerance and acceptance" of transamabobs in the ladies' restrooms to "Let us mutilate your son or the state will take him away."
We straight men were told that we are somehow "transphobic" if we refuse to sword fight with a dude in a dress.
We have been beyond tolerant, and what have we gotten in return? According to the blue-haired septum-ringed barbarians, we are all still just a bunch of fascist Nazis who need to be eradicated.
I'm guessing we aren't popular with the trans-vampire crowd either.
https://x.com/its_The_Dr/status/1972704210476061152?
Our tolerance led us to watch Charlie Kirk get assassinated in front of his family. Women athletes are forced to share showers with men. If they complained, they were threatened that they'd be kicked off the team and perhaps kicked out of their college.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
P
Indulged in this for a time, error goes on to assert equal rights. Truth and error are two balancing forces. The Church shall do nothing which looks like deciding between them; that would be partiality. It is bigotry to assert any superior right for the truth. We are to agree to differ and any favoring of the truth, because it is truth, is partisanship. What the friends of truth and error hold in common is fundamental. Anything on which they differ is “ipso facto” non-essential. Anybody who makes account of such a thing is a disturber of the peace of the church. Truth and error are two co-ordinate powers, and the great secret of church-statesmanship is to preserve the balance between them.
From this point error soon goes on to its natural end, which is to assert supremacy. Truth started with tolerating; it comes to be merely tolerated and that only for a time. Error claims a preference for its judgments on all disputed points. It puts men into position, not as at first in spite of their departure from the Church’s faith, but in consequence of it. Their recommendation is that they repudiate that faith, and position is given them to teach others to repudiate it, and make them skillful in combating it." (pp. 195-196)
From: “THE CONSERVATIVE REFORMATION AND ITS THEOLOGY as represented in the Augsburg Confession and in the history and literature of the Evangelical Lutheran Church” by Charles P. Krauth, D.D. (1871). [Note date]
Liberals are extremely tolerant of everyone they agree with.
People forget, Obama came into office saying he was against gay marriage. He would have sailed through eight years with that position, if Biden hadn’t gone on a show during the reelection campaign, saying he was for it. Then the roof collapsed on Obama, and he had to cave.
Interesting switcheroo...
“Never underestimate Joe’s ability to @&€£ things up.”
It goes like this. I call it the victim status continuum.
Tolerance > acceptance > celebrate > super citizen class > oligarchy
It’s similar to the Jewish catch-22: the offer of free ham.
People forget, Obama came into office saying he was against gay marriage. He would have sailed through eight years with that position, if Biden hadn’t gone on a show during the reelection campaign, saying he was for it. Then the roof collapsed on Obama, and he had to cave.
https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-larry-sinclair
I’ve shown in many posts for years that I am intolerant of tolerance.
If you are saying we should believe this, just because he said it, with no other proof, you also must believe what E. Jean Carroll or Stormy Daniels say?
Tolerate——
Acceptance——
.
And Then,”You Must Ware The Ribbon!”
just like muslim MOFOS
It’s time for homos to be descreet so that no one knows about it.
First time I heard the chant, "We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children" I knew they'rd never be able to overplay thair hand again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.