All pictures are posted for Educational Purposes in Accordance with Fair Use
Posted on 09/27/2025 1:13:32 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
The legal team representing defendants in a forthcoming Supreme Court case to protect women's sports has responded after the transgender plaintiff asked the court to drop the case.
The defense team, led by Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador and Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorney Kristen Waggoner, filed its response after former Boise State University transgender athlete Lindsay Hecox, requested the athlete's initial lawsuit to fight for trans inclusion in women's sports from 2022 be dismissed, after SCOTUS agreed to hear the case.....
The Little v. Hecox lawsuit was initially filed by Hecox in 2020, when the trans athlete wanted to join the women's cross-country team and block the state's law preventing trans athletes from competing in women's sports.
Hecox was joined by an anonymous biological female student, Jane Doe, who was concerned about the potential of being subjected to the sex dispute verification process. The challenge was successful, and a federal judge blocked Idaho's state law.
A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel upheld an injunction blocking the state law in 2023, before the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case in July. Hecox then asked SCOTUS earlier this month to drop the challenge, claiming the athlete "has therefore decided to permanently withdraw and refrain from playing any women’s sports at BSU or in Idaho."
But Labrador and Waggoner are now arguing that Hecox’s attempt to dismiss the case is barred by the a stay of all proceedings that Hecox previously agreed to. The defense attorneys also argue Hecox still has an interest in preserving the lower court decision to keep open the option of playing women’s sports.
"This case is not moot simply because Hecox claims to have decided not to play women’s sports," the response read.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Also, would/should the plaintiffs that won the case so far be liable for court and legal costs?
The USSC won't dismiss the case. The trans community is probably pissed that the case got to the USSC. There will be the usual 6-3 ruling against Lindsay Hecox.
It’s hard for me to realize this is even a case that is in the hands of a court. There are males and females and you can “pretend” all you want, but you are what you were born with, xx or xy. Period. End of story. This is beyond ludicrous, it’s insanity.
Such a lovely lass to bring home to meet the parents.
Mom, Dad, this is a GUY!!
EEK!!! 😱🙀😨😱🙀😳🙀🙀
Yup...then it will be a legal precedent...then they’ll have to conjure up some other phony situation so they can sue to reverse the ruling....we gotta’ resist the delusion..
Maybe these people have seizure activity in their brain which continually fires up delusional thoughts.
Some recent work shows that certain autistic behaviours in patients with subclinical epileptiform brain waves can be lessened by using anti-epileptic medication.
>> transgender athlete Lindsay Hecox
“Hecox”
You can’t make this stuff up, can you... ROFL
>> Maybe these people have seizure activity in their brain which continually fires up delusional thoughts.
I think the origin of their apparent mental illness is spiritual. Demonic.
“...God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind...”
— from Paul’s letter to the Romans, chapter 1
Let’s just be honest. Lindsay HECocks.
Yes. We have to do something about all the testicular injuries in women’s sports.
Yeah that’s pretty bizarre
“””“Hecox”
You can’t make this stuff up, can you... ROFL”””
And the case is called Little Hecox.
Absolutely! Are we going to have SCOTUS use their wisdom of Solomon from on high to pass judgement that “water is wet”?
They could even argue that.
Haven’t heard anything about cervical cancer in men’s sports. Yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.