Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Trump's Tariffs are Legal
National Economics Editorial ^ | September 4, 2025 | Spencer P. Morrison

Posted on 09/04/2025 12:02:53 PM PDT by LibertyFound

After five brutal months of unrestricted lawfare against the Trump Administration, it looks like the Supreme Court will finally weigh-in on tariffs.

On August 29, 2025, a Federal Circuit Court of Appeal decided that President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs were illegal.

Specifically, the Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the President to impose tariffs of unlimited duration, on all goods from all countries. This is because tariffs are not mentioned in the Statute, and even if they were, the tariffs are not credibly related to a national emergency.

The Trump Administration is appealing. Solicitor General D. John Sauer states unequivocally that striking the tariffs “would expose our nation to trade retaliation without effective defences” and “thrust America back to the brink of economic catastrophe.”

President Trump himself hammered this point home on Truth Social, stating that without tariffs “our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated”.

President Trump is right.

Not has America’s economy been completely hollowed-out due to unrestricted “free" trade with adversaries like China, but America’s national security is jeopardized by reliance on foreign supply chains—this is a national emergency, and tariffs are the solution.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaleconomicseditorial.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: commerce; economics; judgewatch; lawfare; scotus; spencerpmorrison; supremecourt; tariffs; trade

1 posted on 09/04/2025 12:02:53 PM PDT by LibertyFound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound

So every President before Trump had the legal authority to impose tariffs but, orange man can’t....

Got it


2 posted on 09/04/2025 12:28:58 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

You finally caught on.


3 posted on 09/04/2025 12:35:55 PM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound

It’s a legislative power.


4 posted on 09/04/2025 2:38:10 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Democrat cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The Trade Act of 1974 gives potus tariff authority.


5 posted on 09/04/2025 2:44:47 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va

So you say.

No branch can constitutionally give away its powers to another branch.


6 posted on 09/04/2025 2:45:31 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Democrat cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Regulator and trade authority is delegated all the time.


7 posted on 09/04/2025 2:48:50 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/


8 posted on 09/04/2025 3:03:47 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Democrat cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That’s how progressives govern; it’s not how constitutionalists govern.


9 posted on 09/04/2025 3:04:13 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Democrat cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I’m slow.

Ask any Democrat...


10 posted on 09/04/2025 3:32:01 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound

Actually, Trump and MAGA Republicans game planned in advance to an end around the 1974 provision, which did actually give him enough latitude in Trade so Lindsay Graham got the Big Beautiful Bill to include POTUS National Security provisions allowing the president emergency authority thus bypassing congress due to the threats cited and slowness of legislative action.

The BBB is the now Trump’s controlling authority, if it holds up with SCOTUS.


11 posted on 09/04/2025 3:54:00 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound
See my topic from today on this subject:

Political Junkie’s Advanced AI Review of the Federal Circuit Court’s Rejection of President Trump’s Tariffs

-PJ

12 posted on 09/04/2025 4:37:08 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound

Better defense: Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 empowers the President of the United States to impose new or additional duties—up to 50% ad valorem—on imports from countries that are found to discriminate against U.S. commerce, either by imposing unreasonable charges, regulations, or by favoring other nations over the United States in trade practices.


13 posted on 09/05/2025 3:33:33 AM PDT by Zman ("Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play."--- Joseph Goebbels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Trump is appealing court-denial of tariffs.

Trump’s Solicitor General D. John Sauer states unequivocally that
<><> striking the tariffs “would expose our nation to trade retaliation without effective defences”
<><>and “thrust America back to the brink of economic catastrophe.”

President Trump himself hammered this point home on Truth Social, stating that without tariffs
<><>“our Country would be completely destroyed,
<><>and our military power would be instantly obliterated”.


14 posted on 09/05/2025 5:32:39 AM PDT by Liz (May you be in Heaven half an hour before the devil kno ws you're dead (Irish blessing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

What is interesting to me about the Trump imposed tariffs is the fact that while there is a law suit challenge in the courts, the Congress does not seem overly in distress.

The tariffs are a real tax increase accomplished by the President that can provide funds to eliminate the deficit and maybe reduce the debt.

The congress lacks the will to do any of that.


15 posted on 09/05/2025 5:39:04 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Where is ZORRO when California so desperately needs him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibertyFound

Opposing our tariffs is a lot like opposing our military.


16 posted on 09/05/2025 5:41:33 AM PDT by reasonisfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson