Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Constitutional Longshot: Trump Touts Voter ID by Executive Order
Liberty Nation ^ | Sep 1, 2025 | James Fite

Posted on 09/01/2025 2:10:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The president will be hard pressed to come up with a work around for the Constitution on this one.

President Donald Trump declared his intent to sign a new executive order – this time, on voter ID. Polls show it’s a popular idea, sure, but popular doesn’t equal constitutional. And while one could argue that any order a president signs is something like functionally legal until a court rules otherwise, this one seems like a stretch.

Trump Loves Voter ID, and So Do Americans

“Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!! Also, No Mail-In Voting, Except For Those That Are Very Ill, And The Far Away Military. USE PAPER BALLOTS ONLY!!! President DJT,” the commander-in-chief posted on Truth Social Saturday night. And a lot of Americans share the sentiment.

According to a poll from Gallup just before the 2024 elections, 84% of US adults favored requiring voters to show ID at the polls and 83% supported requiring proof of citizenship when registering for the first time. Even when respondents were categorized by political affiliation, both ideas were more popular than not. Republicans supported mandatory voter ID by 98% and requiring proof of citizenship to register by 96%, and 84% of independents chose both. Even Democrats came out in support of both measures, 67% and 66%, respectively. That’s a two-thirds majority!

This isn’t the president’s first executive order regarding voter ID, either – and the last one didn’t exactly pan out. Back in March, Trump signed an order that, among other things, required voters to show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote in federal elections. In April, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court for the District of Columbia, a Clinton appointee, struck down any portions...

(Excerpt) Read more at libertynation.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; voterid

1 posted on 09/01/2025 2:10:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah, bold move, right move. But likely unconstitutional.


2 posted on 09/01/2025 2:12:08 PM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump is signalling to the Senate — “A little help over here ...?”


3 posted on 09/01/2025 2:12:11 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Society has no reward for following the rules any more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Freeloading, thieving, piñata busters should not be allowed to vote in OUR COUNTRY. They are not U.S. citizens. They are yellow cowards too cowardly to fight for their own countries. They want to ride on the taxpayers’ backs like we are all a bunch of DemonRAT jackasses.


4 posted on 09/01/2025 2:14:26 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Is this damn country so hard up for Judges that we have to hire Sparkle Sookananan from Trinidad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Congress could slow down the EO flood by doing its job. You know, pass bills and work with the other house to get agreement on something that goes to the President for signature and enactment. BUT, that would require doing their job instead of preening for the cameras.


5 posted on 09/01/2025 2:19:34 PM PDT by Bernard (Issue an annual budget. And Issue a federal government balance sheet. Let's see what we got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump is properly going to attempt to make Voter ID an issue.

Common sense tells me this issue should be a no-brainer for the Republican wing of the uniparty.

But as everyone knows they are little more that namby pamby pansies who don’t possess much in the way of common sense.


6 posted on 09/01/2025 2:20:35 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

The 15th Amendment says the Federal government can set the laws across the country in regards to voting, but the states can administer it.

It would help if Congress did this.


7 posted on 09/01/2025 2:27:26 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Pornography feeds abortion. Abortion is Satan's ultimate effort to hurt God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A Constitutional longhot indeed, but a good way to stir-up concern about vote cheating and get Congress to act.


8 posted on 09/01/2025 2:30:07 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Emphasize the fact that the US is the ONLY country on Earth that does not require photo ID to vote.


9 posted on 09/01/2025 2:31:44 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Why is there no mention of FEC/HAVA Federal Election Commission Help America Vote Act?

FEC/HAVA is the root of the problem.


10 posted on 09/01/2025 2:37:46 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Also get rid of that Motor-Voter registration law that Bill Clinton pushed.


11 posted on 09/01/2025 2:44:07 PM PDT by Flavious_Maximus (Tony Fauci will be put on death row and die of COVID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He just wants to show dims on the other side of a 80/20 issue.


12 posted on 09/01/2025 3:04:58 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

True, but wouldn’t it require 60 votes in the Senate to become law?


13 posted on 09/01/2025 3:32:21 PM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

His taking action may force Congress to pass a law, because he can argue that Congress is not looking after the people. It will basically come down to Americans forcing the hands of the Senate.


14 posted on 09/01/2025 3:35:41 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Pornography feeds abortion. Abortion is Satan's ultimate effort to hurt God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

That won’t happen. Democrats know if a law were passed to force clean elections, they’re doomed. There will never be 60 votes in the senate to pass election reform.


15 posted on 09/01/2025 3:45:40 PM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What’s plan B after some filthy democrat judge that re pubic ans voted for kills it?


16 posted on 09/01/2025 4:12:38 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If nothing else, this will suss out who among the Republicans is AGAINST the idea, and who is FOR it.


17 posted on 09/01/2025 4:22:42 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Article 1, Section 4

Section 4.

The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators.

The State legislature makes the rules, and the power to change said rules is reserved to the Federal Congress.

18 posted on 09/01/2025 9:29:05 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson