Posted on 08/28/2025 9:52:57 AM PDT by Red Badger
Robert Primus, who has served on the independent Surface Transportation Board, said he would explore his legal options if prevented from carrying out his duties.
==============================================================
WASHINGTON — The White House said Thursday that it has fired a member of the Surface Transportation Board, a move that comes as the independent federal regulatory agency is considering the proposed merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern railroad companies.
"Earlier this evening, I received an email from the White House purporting to terminate my position at the Surface Transportation Board," Robert Primus wrote in a post to LinkedIn on Wednesday. "This is deeply troubling and legally invalid."
Primus' termination, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, comes as the White House has increasingly moved to exert control over agencies across the federal government, including those considered to be independent.
Primus said in his post that he planned to "continue to discharge my duties as a member of the Board and, if I’m prevented from doing so, I will explore my legal options."
The Presidential Personnel Office — which is now set to be run by longtime Trump aide Dan Scavino — did not offer a reason for Primus’ dismissal, according to a copy of the email seen by MSNBC. Staff member Mary Sprowls said that his position as a member was terminated “effective immediately.” Access to Primus’ government devices was shut off on Wednesday evening, according to a person familiar with matter.
Reached for comment, a White House spokesperson did not provide a specific reason for Primus' firing.
"Robert Primus did not align with the President’s America First agenda, and was terminated from his position by the White House," White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. "The Administration intends to nominate new, more qualified members to the Surface Transportation Board in short order."
The board did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Surface Transportation Board began the regulatory review process for the proposed railway merger in July, after Union Pacific announced that it would acquire Norfolk Southern at a price tag of $85 billion.
The deal, which would create the nation’s first transcontinental railroad, is still under review by the board. The proposal has faced pushback from labor unions and sparked controversy over its potential impact on competition in the railroad industry.
Primus' term was set to end in 2027, according to the board's website. He was confirmed to the board in the final months of President Donald Trump's first term and became the chairman during the Biden administration. A new chairman was appointed at the start of Trump's second term.
The board typically has five members, and Congress designed it to ensure that it would not be dominated solely by one political party. There is one remaining Democrat on the board.
Before joining the Surface Transportation Board, Primus worked with several Democratic members of Congress.
The Trump administration has increasingly moved to exert more control over agencies, working to oust officials whom the White House deems insufficient to carry out the president's agenda. Earlier this week, Trump announced he was moving to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, though Cook sued Trump Thursday morning.
On Wednesday, the Trump administration fired Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Susan Monarez, prompting several other top health officials to exit the agency in protest.
In January, Trump fired two Democratic commissioners at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In March, he fired two Democratic commissioners at the Federal Trade Commission. In May, Trump fired the Librarian of Congress, and then later fired the head of the U.S. Copyright Office.
The Trump administration has also fired a member of the National Labor Relations Board, the NLRB’s general counsel and the head of the ethics watchdog, the Office of Special Counsel. He also dismissed the head of the National Archives, going on to install Secretary of State Marco Rubio as the acting head.
The Supreme Court previously handed Trump a win in legal battles over his firings of independent agency members, temporarily blocking a lower court that ruled that two fired officials should be reinstated. The high court has also indicated that the Federal Reserve could be treated differently, calling it a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity.” The separate distinction sets up what is expected to be a high-profile legal battle as Cook challenges Trump's firing.
Ummm... the writer, had they paid any attention during primary school, would have known that happened in May of 1869.
What passes for journalism these days...
I am so glad Trump is tackling this. There should be no such thing as a government agency that is not reportable to the Chief executive. Independent is unconstitutional.
If the executive cannot fire those effectively reporting to him, we have a problem.
Hope this idiot spends a fortune on lawyers, and loses his case. He should take early retirement and find another job. Sounds like a narcissistic POS wasting taxpayer dollars.
How are they an independent agency if their paycheck comes from us? There are 3 branches of government, they are in one.
What he means is one transcontinental railroad company................
We are living in a post-educated world.
Just a pencil necked bureaucrat. A flunky to some on the dirtiest ‘Rats in Congress.
Doesn’t seem to have ever held a real job.
But he did get a certificate of participation from Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government.
https://www.stb.gov/about-stb/board-members/previous-board-members/robert-e-primus/
“How are they an independent agency if their paycheck comes from us? “
___________________________________________________________
Perfectly good question, Resolute. There is really no such thing, no, matter how much some may wish it so. The 1st chapters of any course on the Constitution, would make that clear. Any actual greaduate of Constitution 101 would agree with you.
That's probably what he meant, but it's not what he said.
I'd say to that guy the same thing I say to my grandkids - USE YOUR WORDS. lol
On the other hand, I wouldn’t strongly oppose a reasonably neutral and non-partisan Board. It would make sense if it worked at truly addressing transportaion issues. On the other hand, I have not seen many unicorns lately.
Another Apparatchik who thinks that they do not serve at the pleasure of the Chief Executive, sometimes called the President Of The United States, who is not pleased with this particular apparatchik.
Suppose a Democrat becomes President in 2029 (or 2033 or whenever — it will happen sometime).
Is it the consensus on FR that President Newsom or President Ocasio-Cortez would have the power to fire all of President Trump’s appointees, including to independent bodies like the Federal Reserve Board? And that President Trump’s appointees could all be fired on January 20, for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all?
I can see merit to the idea of independent agencies that are insulated from short-term shifts in political power. If one new member (out of 7, say) is appointed every year, then elections will still have consequences, but there won’t be a total and immediate turnover the way there is for the Cabinet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.