Posted on 08/07/2025 5:44:31 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing negative about President Donald Trump during her nine hour interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, ABC News reported on Wednesday.
According to ABC’s sources, Maxwell told Blanche that “Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern.”
The jailhouse interview took place over two days, last month, and and according to Maxwell’s attorney David Markus, she “didn’t hold anything back.”
The Trump administration is reportedly considering releasing the transcripts from the interview to the public, but it’s not clear whether the administration plans to release the audio recording of the interview.
Maxwell, an associate of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was convicted of sex trafficking and other charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022, which she was serving at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, until her recent move to a more relaxed federal prison camp in Texas. She is appealing her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trump supposedly has not ruled out a pardon for her, according to ABC.
In August of 2019, nearly 2,000 court documents detailing Epstein’s trafficking of teenage girls in Palm Beach, New York and overseas were unsealed in a federal civil case in New York. Shortly thereafter, Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell.
His death was ruled a suicide and the Trump Justice Department agreed with those findings in a memo, last month, but many still believe “Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
Following his first day of meeting with Maxwell, Blanche posted on X that “The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time.”
When asked during an interview with Newsmax last week when the interview transcript would be made public, Trump replied: “I don’t know, because I haven’t spoken about it, but he’s a very talented guy, Todd Blanche, and a very straight shooter, and I think he probably wanted to know, you know, just to get a feeling of it, because we’d like to release everything, but we don’t want people to get hurt that shouldn’t be hurt. And I would assume that was why he was there. I want to release everything. I just don’t want people to get hurt.”
Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz has also said that there is nothing in the Epstein files he’s seen that incriminating to Donald Trump.
Dersh claimed in a previous interview that he was given access to Epstein’s court documents when Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre sued him, and he was able to see the names of a number of people associated with the disgraced financier.
“Let me tell you, I know for a fact documents are being suppressed and being suppressed to protect individuals,” Dershowitz told Sean Spicer earlier this year. “I know the names of the individuals, I know why they’re being suppressed, I know who’s suppressing him,” he continued. “But I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases and I can’t disclose what I know.”
During an interview with News Nation on Tuesday, Dershowitz said: “There’s nothing in there—I know what’s in the files—there’s nothing in there incriminating in any way, as far as I know, about Donald Trump.”
Something that won’t be on the front page of the New York Times or the Washington Post.
Some really tight buttholes in the halls of power lately I bet.
Trump’s name is linked with Epstein’s.
Again.
That’s what Deep State wants.
For all the good it will do them.
Desperate much, Deep State...?
BTW, in the UK, too.
Check out the British tabs this morning.
Same thing, different Deep State, this time aimed at the House of Windsor.
The same House of Windsor that MI5 and MI6 allowed Epstein and Maxwell access to for over a decade.
Because Trump did nothing wrong. But even if he did, she wouldn't say anything, because she was gunning for a pardon (and got a transfer to a posh prison where she gets to train puppies).
The issue the DS has is they know the truth. Everyone on Earth knows if there was anything that couldve stopped Trump from being reelected it would have been released by now. Its as simple as that. How can the deep state reconcile that?
Not a great character witness. Please define something that would cause concern . Obviously not trafficking underage girls for sex .
Trump cut ties with them a long time ago. She probably wont remember we’re talking early 90s here.
She was the top mod on Reddit for a long time.
Cindy McCain said people knew what was going on but couldn’t stop it
This is a mutual destruction issue.
I suspect UK, Israel and CIA knew for sure
Why would the powers that be wait till AFTER Trump was elected to accuse him of going to sex parties? Cause there’s no there there.
“”Not a great character witness. Please define something that would cause concern””
With a record/reputation like hers, how can anyone be surprised at that statement from her? What would it take? I’m surprised no one else has come up with that question.
“Trump supposedly has not ruled out a pardon for her, according to ABC.”
***********************************
So how will it look if Maxwell testifies Trump did nothing wrong then Trump goes ahead and pardons her? If that’s his plan he might want to think again. Trump’s supporters are not as stupid as he seems to think. (at least not most of us anyway).
Trump had too much to lose to go down there and destroy his repretation.
A poorly written sentence.
Regardless, President Trump will never pardon or commute the sentence of a convicted sex trafficker of children. Never.
“Because Trump did nothing wrong. But even if he did, she wouldn’t say anything, because she was gunning for a pardon “
I agree. Ghislaine’s motives aren’t pure.
Maxwell has a vested interest in making exculpatory statements about Trump.
“Trump’s name is linked with Epstein’s. Again. That’s what Deep State wants.”
You nailed it. It’s a quite clever story actually.
What would ‘concern’ a person guilty of sex trafficking of minors? Why would she say something bad about a person she hopes will pardon her?
So yes many naive and stupid people will laugh off this story and say of course Trump is guilty etc which is the intent of the article.
Anyone that knows anything about Trump in his younger days knows he liked hot women not young girls.
Well, any interrogation, Grand Jury hearings etc, for her criminal investigation and trial would include any statements she may have made about Trump or any one else. I think that info would have been loaded by now if there was anything negative about Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.