Posted on 08/06/2025 11:23:13 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Survey suggests UBI has minimal impact.
Last October, I reported on a study that gave participants $1,000 a month and measured the impacts of the transfer. The results were disappointing to advocates of universal basic income (UBI). To summarize, the study found that people worked less, and, according to the researchers:
[Participants] used the time they gained from working less to engage in leisure, and there is no evidence of an increased use of time in other categories UBI proponents purport to care about, such as creative output, entrepreneurship, community engagement, self-improvement, or even spending time with children.
A second study on guaranteed income had similarly underwhelming results.
In a recent paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), researchers Patrick K. Krause, Elizabeth Rhodes, Sarah Miller, Alexander W. Bartik, David E. Broockman, and Eva Vivalt examined the effects of unconditional cash transfers on parental behavior and children.
In this study, 1,000 participant families received $1,000 per month over three years, while a control group of 2,000 participants received just $50 per month. The study tracked the impact (or lack thereof) of this financial support on parenting behaviors and outcomes.
Let’s get into the results, starting with the good news. Parents in the guaranteed income group spent more on their children. The researchers estimate an additional $43 per month went to food and $22 more to child care. This is unsurprising. As income increases, we expect people to increase spending. What is surprising, though, is that this additional spending did not lead to any tangible results such as improved food security.
The parents on the survey also self-reported improved parenting behaviors, including more direct supervision of their children.
However, other findings complicate that narrative. The researchers found no significant change in time spent on parenting activities, and no...
(Excerpt) Read more at fee.org ...
NO!
“Survey suggests UBI has minimal impact.”
Captain Obvious says, “They’re smokin’ really bad weed.”
sounds like communism making everyone poor
People who can’t afford to raise children should refrain from having children.
$1,000 would become $2,000 then $3,000 and so forth ad infinitum.
Exactly, the answer is no!
Correct.
It will guarantee that they will need guaranteed income for life.
People used to work, because if they didn’t they’d starve and end up on the street. Now government handouts dull that instinct. Survival doesn’t drive people when the state steps in.
DON’T FEED THE BEARS!!!
AND DON'T READ THE ARTICLE!!!
Oddly enough, Milton Friedman recommended this policy to Richard Nixon.
Yes, the government employees administering the program will be paid handsomely and receive lavish benefits.
I have a guaranteed income, BUT I EARNED IT!
From my retirements and social security I make about $90,000
per year.
I have no debts. I own my home and property.
I’m probably an exception, but I spent my entire life
doing what you are supposed to do.
Work hard, get educated, have a family
all that 1950’s family show stuff, IT WORKS!
A good drug addict can make enough LEGAL money to support the habit. Society make it a problem by forcing people to do things they don’t want to do.
Freedom is the way to live, not Democrat mandated policies.
No, it would worsen an already bad situation.
By guaranteeing a certain level of income, prices will rise to meet that level and you wind up right back where you started from.................
That's exactly what the article says! You must be psychic!
Simple logic.................
Short answer: NO.
“And our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there’s no war or famine, oppression or brutality — one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.”
- Arthur Jensen (Network)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.