Posted on 07/19/2025 9:20:25 PM PDT by ransomnote
https://x.com/doge/status/1946345134724886702
Department of Government Efficiency
@DOGE
Great partnership and collaboration with the @CMSGov
team to help eliminate $14B in duplicative Medicaid and ACA enrollment. After identifying the correct databases and validating datasets, the CMS and DOGE teams were able to uncover 2.8 million Americans improperly enrolled in multiple programs.CMS will be working with states to delete duplicative enrollments and ensure that NO individuals lose their one, lawful health insurance policy. As a result of this effort, beneficiaries will now receive the appropriate level of care without placing undue burden on the American taxpayer.
DrOzCMS
@DrOzCMS
·
Jul 17
CMS found 2.8 million Americans enrolled in two or more Medicaid or ACA plans - wasting over $14 Billion in taxpayer funding! This is exactly why we fought for stronger tools in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. https://cms.gov/newsroom/press
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Get that extra money back from recipients or throw them in prison!
we can't stop all of this corruption but wouldn't it be nice to cut off the govts multiple taxing authorities that keep the masses poor or struggling.
every single thing in life has some tax to it.
Where’s the government oversight?
Why aren’t reporters asking members of the congressional oversight committees about the fraud, waste and abuse?
It may be the state level medicaid/ACA which is absorbing funds. A person doesn’t need two blood tests - one from each of two different medicaid programs. However, if someone moves from Maine to Idaho, they may have 2 accounts, one in each state. It’s possible the states leave people on the rolls, even if notified of a move, in order to keep their portion of taxpayer awarded funds from the Feds.
In CA, these services are heavily over used. I guess someone could open two accounts and give one to an illegal to use. In which case, yes, send them the bill.
bookmark.
Almost Bingo.
Two accounts...lab or other provider bills to each.
Double payments for just one patient.
What’s not to like? /s
WUT!
Here’s what’s going on...
If your income falls below a limit, and you live in a state with “expanded Medicaid,” and you apply for insurance on Healthcare.gov, your name will be sent to Medicaid.
Even if you’re able to change your application and qualify for an “ACA plan” right away, Medicaid will keep your name on its list. Then, Medicaid will refuse to remove your name, even if you call multiple times and tell them to remove your name, tell them you have insurance, and never use Medicaid.
It’s funny how the politicians didn’t know that. They don’t even know what their own laws do. Many of us could’ve told “DOGE” ourselves. It wasn’t a big secret.
the government cant even vote honestly on its first vote in favor of rescission. A struggle for them, leaving 400 million for African aids programs, sickening
Thank you DOGE.
Let’s not forget about the Federal or State employees that facilitated this theft. These people didn’t accidentally end up being approved for these programs.
We are hammered every year with 4 months of “Change your plan” windows.
IF anyone changes their plan, and the older plan never reports such-—THAT helps this mess.
Wonder if this has anything to do with the cratering stock price of various health insurance companies.
Medicaid money does not go to Medicaid members. It goes to Hospitals, doctors, other providers. It goes to insurance companies. It goes to IT companies that manage who gets Medicaid membership. Those companies vary in honesty and competence.
DELOITTE is the poster child for the worst. It develops very poor quality EMPI-Enterprise Master Person Indexes and profits from the poor quality.
DeLoitte uses political connections to secure its contracts. Its work is not based on competence or honesty.
There are other IT companies that are not as corrupt but are less than competent. There are Insurance companies that vary in honesty and competence.
And then there are IT companies that are relatively honest and competent when compared to the above.
If Medicaid is to be argued as a benefit to society, there needs to be some way in the contracting process for the honest and competent to be evaluated.
Currently nationwide it is common in the bidding process that the State Government cannot use known incompetence and/or dishonesty on other contracts in considering a bid for a new or additional contract.
When bidders are rejected for a new contract they can appeal the decision and make it so unpleasant that nobody wants to say “you were rejected because you are dishonest, incompetent or both.”
One alternative is to have such a big umbrella project that everybody, good and bad, are included. Everybody gets money. The only ones excluded are those who question the value of spreading the IT wealth.
If Medicaid is to be beneficial to society, and the way many State government contracts are awarded, the process needs to be improved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.