Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/18/2025 6:08:11 PM PDT by DoodleBob
The news of “The Late Show’s” cancellation by CBS doesn’t just end a franchise that had, to this point, lasted more than 30 years. It looks like the beginning of the end of an entire category of television. With one network now opting out of late-night talk entirely, how long will it be before the genre just goes away?
CBS announced the cancellation nearly a full year before it is to take effect, making current host Stephen Colbert a lame duck of sorts; he will continue hosting the show through May 2026, at which point it will simply disappear. Observers have noted with interest that Colbert has, lately, been especially critical of CBS’s parent company, Paramount; while this may have made him less beloved internally, the trendlines on late night have been moving in the wrong direction for some time.
Taylor Tomlinson, whose “After Midnight,” also on CBS, was designed as a less cost-intensive alternative once James Corden left the network, decided to return to stand-up comedy full-time; rather than finding a new host, CBS simply axed the show. Seth Meyers, on NBC, has been asked to cut back on expenses, including, last year, firing the band who had provided his show structure and groove. And thrumming under celebratory coverage of Lorne Michaels, as his creation “Saturday Night Live” marked its 50th anniversary, has been the sense that whomever is his successor will not have the leverage at NBC to continue to put on quite so lavish a show. (That’s to say nothing of the fate of “The Tonight Show” and “Late Night,” which Michaels also produces.)
Could “SNL,” which so defines the national cultural agenda, just… go away? A day ago, I wouldn’t have thought “The Late Show” would. The show’s high-toned attempt to be a sort of comedy/public-affairs hybrid did not land for this viewer, but no matter: After initial struggles to break through, Colbert’s liberal, newsy sensibility connected with viewers in the first Donald Trump administration, and vaulted him ahead of NBC’s Jimmy Fallon and ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel in his timeslot. His perspective was important enough to the network that they’d put him on live after major news, like last year’s debate between Trump and Kamala Harris, so that he could respond in real time.
The fact is, though, that the coin of the realm in late-night is not whoever still has their television set turned on in the wee hours; hosts must generate moments that, the next morning, go viral. (Inasmuch as late night has a future, then, it looks more like Fallon, whose inane “Jorts Summer” video with Nick Jonas and Will Ferrell traveled all over my social feeds the day Colbert’s news broke. Everyone I saw sharing the video was mocking it — but they were sharing it.) What Colbert was trying to do — convene discussions that had a tie back to current events — doesn’t have much of a place in culture nowadays.
The question is, though: What does? Late night can be silly, or inane, or (in Colbert’s case, at times) a bit grandiose, but it’s also a format rooted in the earliest days of television. The fact of late night’s longevity to this point isn’t, alone, a reason to mourn it, but the ambition of those early days might be: In history, television was a uniting force, a sort of national gathering-place. And late night had a certain cathartic effect, summing up the day that was. I’m old enough to remember the intense yearning for Colbert’s predecessor at CBS, David Letterman, to speak to the national mood in the days after Sept. 11, 2001; that he did so with grace and aplomb came as no surprise.
Late night going away piece-by-piece is, in some ways, a business responding to the marketplace; no one expects Colbert, Kimmel or Fallon to heal the wounds of the nation, and far fewer people watch any of them than watched Letterman or Jay Leno at the turn of the century. But, as with so much lately, from the massive (the dismantling of the federal government) to the relatively small-bore (the New York Times tearing up its criticism desk seemingly without a forward-looking plan), the problem isn’t necessarily that something is going away. It’s that nothing is coming to replace it. From the jobs of the many craftspeople it takes, in collaboration, to make a “Late Show”-style enterprise go to the place it occupied in our culture as a lighthearted staging-ground for talk between two people at a time — no new thing will be that.
If there’s one defining flaw of the social-media apps that have replaced television as the primary conduit for information and entertainment, it’s their siloing effect — everyone getting entertainment custom-tailored for them sounds like a dream until one realizes that no one is in conversation with anyone else. We’re all just talking to ourselves. “The Late Show” and its competitors are not a public good, and CBS isn’t required to subsidize something that isn’t serving their interests. But even still, it’s worth mourning a type of show premised on the idea that we all lived in a shared reality, one that a gifted bridger of increasingly broad gaps between us might make coherent and make funny. “The Late Show” wasn’t built for these times; one dreads imagining the type of show that would be.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
They despised the normal people of this nation.
The only thing “chilling” to the writer is that aside from the 200,000 people watching Colbert in the 18-49 age bracket, we don’t care.
Re-make of Starsky and Hutch starring two bros, one a transsexual?
Those shows were cool and fun. But now they have massive content from any interesting person they can imagine online. And the fun of the Johnny Carson, Lenno, early Letterman and other shows has been replaced with hyper-partisan meanness. The comedy is no longer funny, it’s just mockery.
They were already facing headwinds, and their politics killed it.
Late night talk shows ( ONLY ON NBC, FWIW) began on NBC with Steve Allen as host in the early 1950s, followed by Jack Paar, and then Johnny Carson, which makes this kind of show somewhere over SEVENTY YEARS OLD!
When the late-night Joey Bishop show was cancelled decades ago, did it mark the end of America as we know it?
The real reason is that comedy can’t be done with animosity.
Colbert and Kimmel do their political comedy with animosity towards half of the voting population, so it’s only natural that half the people would stop watching.
I remember both Letterman and Conan’s political comedy, which was always absurd and tongue and cheek, and never really attacked politicians for policy, but personality.
Then there’s the fact that young viewers just watch their comedy on Youtube. They don’t tune in to broadcast TV anymore.
Gutfeld is gutting the competition it seems
Letterman was an angry liberal that thought he was better than everyone else and his jokes sucked.
Craig Ferguson was pretty good. Sid the cussing bunny skit was great.
The Ed Sullivan Show is gone. Bonanza is gone. Wagon Train is gone. Gilligan’s Island is gone. Seinfeld is gone. Three’s Company is Gone. And yet the country somehow still lives on.
The EV car to replace the 1974 Ford Gran Torino can have an LGBTQ flag colors paint job to replace the “striped tomato” look.
Pilot of re-boot. Young mayor in NYC has a highly popular, efficient and successful string of people’s food distribution centers replacing the former chain owned supermarkets. Saboteurs led by a suit wearing, short haired Christian minister zealot are trying to ruin the immigrant friendly food centers. Starsky and Hutch arrest one at a pro-life center, another at a Trump rally and then engage in a wild shootout in a church.
Candidly, the only Late Night host I liked since Carson was Conan.
Yea, he’s a lefty. But that wasn’t his jam.
And he was genuinely FUNNY. Further, he let his guests talk.
Anytime Bill Burr was on Conan it was off-the-hook hilarious. He got away with jokes that other hosts would have bleeped. Give it a try. https://youtu.be/rB9Z-os6-Ws
Everyone else sucks.
Corporation makes chilling decision to stop losing $40M a year, film at 11.
I have to agree that late-night TV sucked in 1923.
Yes, admit it, we all know that was the day America was over.
We’re kidding ourselves without Joey Bishop. Self-delusion.😰
Democrats destroyed late night television. They destroy everything that they get control over. I’m starting to see a pattern.
Very few FR posts have made me laugh as hard as yours.
I could picture it in my mind as I read it, maybe that’s why it got me laughing so much.
Humble thanks. Your appreciation makes it all worthwhile.
People tired of his woke spiel ...
The early M*A*S*H was the best, then it went woke and destroyed the show.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.