Glad I will be retiring in a few years.
“Workers in affected fields can adapt by developing skills that complement AI capabilities rather than compete with them. This includes learning to work alongside AI systems, developing expertise in AI tool management, and focusing on tasks that require human judgment, empathy, and creative thinking.
The key to thriving in this new landscape lies in continuous learning, adaptability, and embracing the collaborative potential between human and artificial intelligence.
The future job market will likely reward those who can effectively integrate AI tools into their workflow while providing the strategic thinking, relationship building, and complex decision-making that remain uniquely human strengths.”
Of course, at the rate of AI evolution. Humans will be outdated soon.
Which way mankind?
Butlerian Jihad or extinction?
6. Pornographers
Ping.
So you can have them compile a list of cases for you. But then you need to have a paralegal to check all the cases and see if A. They are real and B. Say what you are looking for. Also you are still going to need that paralegal to look for cases that support you position but were not necessarily about what your case is about. So your LLM of choice never sees them.
If you don't you are, as several law firms have found out, going to end up in front of a judge that is not pleased with you and egg all over your face.
Will it reduce the time your paralegal needs to work? Maybe. Some. But replace? No.
Real life. Not at all like the fantasies of some.
AI will never replace software QA engineers. It will simply become a tool to be leveraged.
-SB
Predictions and expectations:
Some companies will use “Our company gives you the option of actually speaking with a consultant.
Certain long term projects will be created and government funded to provide “jobs” for the millions of people AI will put out of work. It will be seen as a Societal and Mental Health Emergency to maintain some kind of dignified work for all these people to do. It will be somewhat similar to the work projects President Roosevelt organized after the depression.
At least for about 25 years, there will be a quota of how many humans must be employed on certain job sites.
So as to lessen the cultural shock of having one’s work week lose all meaning and most of its lucrative aspects.
Retired and yard nabber are not on the list so I am probably safe for now.
Recently Builder.ai filed for bankruptcy after being exposed for using 700 engineers in India pretending to be "artificial intelligence".
https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/business/27127-builder-ai-collapse-700-indian-engineers-behind-fake-ai-exposed.html
And then there's Amazon, who, instead of relying solely on artificial intelligence and advanced sensors, as Amazon had claimed, heralded the 'Just Walk Out' system that as it turns out was being run with manual labor from over 1,000 workers based in India.
Amazon Abandons Checkout-Less Tech That Secretly Used 1,000 Indian Employees Watching Cameras
https://thedeepdive.ca/amazon-abandons-checkout-less-tech-that-secretly-used-1000-indian-employees-watching-cameras/
Expect the same from all of them. And people need to ask themself where those who are caught are going to work for next.
My company uses AI and my managers have been burned by this tool.
AI determinations do not take into account state statute, case law, have misrepresented what the documents actually say, and lead to incomplete or erroneous conclusions.
Sorry, not impressed.
Sounds like a lot of youngins better rethink trade schools. Or robot repairman.
I use to think that thinking that AI was the Anti-Christ was ridiculous but I am now thinking it might be.
ChatGPT isn’t even three years old yet. AI is improving faster than any previous technology in history. Error correction will ramp up swiftly.
I am a retired clinical hospital pharmacist. My job was not counting pills and advising customers in a retail pharmacy. My job was processing orders from the hospital floor and checking them for rational therapy or not. If good we approved the orders, if not good we contacted the doctor. Sometimes it was a good order and sometimes not. I would not process a bad order.
I refused to process an order that would harm. Oddly though written by a doc that thought it was correct. They were not bad guys but at times simply wrong.
Even before this trend I remember the story of a woman who was a medical transcriptionist who made precise records of the recorded spoken words of doctors including the ones with terribly indecipherable foreign accents of technical medical words.
She said her career was squeezed out when the latest software (2015 or something) was even able to recognize the accents.
RE: relationship building
It will take people skills as in Office Space.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNuu9CpdjIo
Oh, God, chatbots for customer service are the worst to deal with...
If algorithms can be jimmied with, how can AI work be fully trusted?
To bad we can’t have AI run the government.
First we have to teach it to steal.
There are some weird things that happen with AI. In the same way it will draw people with 3 hands, etc., I’ve asked it questions where it literally makes things up. I’ve often asked about what happens in a particular episode of a television series and it just wings out a bunch of balony. I suppose, on average, I get an apology from Grok at least once a day for giving me bad information. I’m certain that things will get better, but I would never trust it to offer a legal or medical opinion without careful human oversight