Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to decide if federal law bars transgender athletes from women’s teams
Los Angeles Times ^ | July 3, 2025 Updated 7:49 AM PT | David G. Savage

Posted on 07/03/2025 4:53:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to weigh in on the growing controversy over transgender athletes and decide if federal law bars transgender girls from women’s school sports teams.

“Biological boys should not compete on girls’ athletics teams,” West Virginia Atty. Gen. JB McCuskey said in an appeal the court voted to hear.

The appeal had the backing of 26 other Republican-led states as well as President Trump.

In recent weeks, Trump threatened to cut off education funds to California because a transgender athlete participated in a women’s track and field competition.

Four years ago, West Virginia adopted its Save Women’s Sports Act but the measure has been blocked as discriminatory by the 4th Circuit Court in 2-1 decision.

Idaho filed a similar appeal after its law was blocked by the 9th Circuit Court in San Francisco. The court said it would hear that case together with the West Virginia case.

At issue is the meaning of Title IX, the federal education law that has been credited with opening the door for the vast expansion of women’s sports. Schools and colleges were told they must give girls equal opportunities in athletics by providing them with separate sports teams.

In the past decade, however, states and their schools divided on the question of who can participate on the girls team. Is it only those who were girls at birth or can it also include those whose gender identity is female?

West Virginia told the court its “legislature concluded that biological boys should compete on boys’ and co-ed teams but not girls’ teams. This separation made sense,...”

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; intercession; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2025 4:53:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Strange times when a mental illness is to be argued in the US Supreme Court.


2 posted on 07/03/2025 4:58:58 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In 1964, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on pornography. Justice Potter Stewart famously couldn’t quite define that topic but did say “I know it when I see it”.

Now the court has a case about Men playing sports with men and Women playing sports with women. Ketanji Brown Jackson may be unable to define what a woman is, but I think the majority of the court will be able to adopt a straight-forward “I know it when I see it”. There are two genders. They are different. This seems like a slam dunk to me.


3 posted on 07/03/2025 5:00:12 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Since Judge Brown said she couldn’t define what a woman was, shouldn’t she recuse heself?


4 posted on 07/03/2025 5:01:45 PM PDT by CaptainK ("No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And now you know why Ketanji pretended she couldn’t define what a woman is in her confirmation hearing. She was laying the groundwork for a case such as this.


5 posted on 07/03/2025 5:03:11 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ditch boy’s and girl’s, men’s and women’s sports, locker rooms, clubs etc. Transition(see what I did there) them to “XY” and “XX”. Problem solved.


6 posted on 07/03/2025 5:03:41 PM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911/June 14, 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Left going after the “All Men are Created Equal”.

Supreme Court may need to dig into military drafting and how that is determined.


7 posted on 07/03/2025 5:03:44 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Didn’t they already make a decision about this recently?


8 posted on 07/03/2025 5:05:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Didn’t they already make a decision about this recently?

They published this article today saying it happened today.

Los Angeles Times | July 3, 2025 Updated 7:49 AM PT | David G. Savage

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to weigh in on the growing controversy over transgender athletes and decide if federal law bars transgender girls from women’s school sports teams.

9 posted on 07/03/2025 5:11:13 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

You beat me to it. She should recuse.


10 posted on 07/03/2025 5:17:05 PM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why wait for a year?

SCOTUS have a poor work ethic and seem to be terribly inefficient.


11 posted on 07/03/2025 5:17:18 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why do you need the SCOTUS to determine trans-males in woman’s sports? It’s a no brainier. Oh, wait ....


12 posted on 07/03/2025 5:21:34 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Not good enough for the boys team? Okay, go join the girls team as a trans woman. In fact, let all the positions on the girls team be taken by trans women. The normal girls are just not good enough for the girls team! But you will have a winning girls team until all the other teams bring in their own trans women.

That way we won’t have girls sports anymore. The girls sports will be trans sports. But hey, that is the price of equality.


13 posted on 07/03/2025 5:37:46 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt (Fascist, deplorable, and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith
Yeah, the SC isn't supposed to jack around with chit like this.
The SC is supposed to deal with constitutional issues that affect large numbers of people.
Pissin around with perverts in girl's locker rooms shouldn't be shoved off on the SC.
14 posted on 07/03/2025 5:44:37 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Supreme Court to decide if federal law bars transgender athletes from women’s teams”

Sadly, it will probably be a 6 - 3 split over whether a person has to be female to compete in female sports . . .


15 posted on 07/03/2025 5:46:27 PM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
Supreme Court may need to dig into military drafting and how that is determined.

I think that ought to be part of the legal argument before the court. If the people on The Swim Team cannot be clearly distinguished based on gender, then I see no way that a draft could avoid women. Denmark is already doing it. Just imagine a million young American women being told to put on the uniform, they're being shipped overseas. It's a non-starter.

16 posted on 07/03/2025 5:48:05 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For starters, there wouldn’t be a WNBA any more.

Just guys dunking their balls in the faces of women!

(pun intended)


17 posted on 07/03/2025 5:59:01 PM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Notice how MUCH of this nonsense
since DEMOCRAT Manchurian Candidate
Barack Hussein Obama and 2015


(U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar blocks "transgender" ban: A Barack Hussein Obama appointee; San Francisco)

(Transgenderism, decadence, sexual deviancy, and moral decay were all present in Rome when the republic became an empire.)

Satan chose Godless Reprobate Democrat Barack Hussein Obama very well

Now the Godless Reprobates were inspired under 8 years of the Lying Kenyan and Resident Vegetable 🥒🍆🥕🥦🫑🥔🥗 Joe Biden


All According to Plan

SATAN is using the Godless Reprobate Agendas to DESTROY NORMAL SOCIETY and the World 🌎🌍 with his old lies from Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis chapter 19

In America, Son of Satan Barack Hussein Obama and his Legion of Goats 🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐 work openly and by stealth (USAID for example) to accomplish Satan's Agenda of turning the whole world 🌍🌏🌎 into a 2SLGBTQ+ Version of Sodom and Gomorrah from Genesis chapter 19.

We ARE in the Days of Lot, just as prophesied by Jesus Christ Himself.


All According to SATAN'S Plan

Rainbow White House happened on Friday, June 26, 2015 - turning the White House into a Godless Reprobate Abomination



Do NO harm, Christians, but REJECT this
Godless Reprobate Agenda.

(For the thread)



This LGBTQ+ metastasizing cancer is all over our Society - AND the WORLD too 🌏🌎🌍 - Which is why I preach (and pray 🙏🛐🙏✝️🙏 others will SHARE the images and the SCRIPTURES (for the thread)
18 posted on 07/03/2025 6:04:04 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in thays of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hoping for 6-3, but may end up 5-4.
It’s a crying shame our Supreme Court has to get involved in matters of mental illness like this. 10 years ago this was obvious to everyone.


19 posted on 07/03/2025 6:41:04 PM PDT by vpintheak (Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It should be a 9-0 case. It’s patently obvious that those who wrote Title IX intended men and women in the biological sense.


20 posted on 07/03/2025 6:43:04 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson