Posted on 06/03/2025 2:17:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The massacre hoax and attacks on aid to Gaza expose the media’s true agenda.
When Israel kills Hamas terrorists, that’s “controversial”. When Israel insists on existing, that’s not only controversial, it’s very nearly provocative, and even when Israel hands out food to its worst enemies who raped and murdered its citizens, and held its children hostage, that’s also… “controversial”.
“Controversial” is the word that the United Nations, the political establishments of multiple countries and the media would like the public to associate with Israel bringing aid into Gaza.
After UN lies about a famine in Gaza no matter how much food came in, Israel and the United States decided to take control of the corrupt UN aid system being used to benefit Hamas.
The media immediately began calling it “controversial”.
What’s controversial about delivering aid to the people the media had told us were starving to death? Two weeks ago, CNN claimed that “1 in 5 people in Gaza face starvation.” (People in Gaza are always “on the edge”, “facing” or “threatened” by starvation, but they never actually starve to death.) Now feeding those same supposed starvation victims is controversial.
But yet here was CNN trying to get the word “controversial” into every headline about the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. You might think that only CNN could manage to make Israel feeding hungry people “controversial”, but the AP, whose personnel on the ground have a long ‘controversial’ relationship with Hamas, began its stories by making “controversial” the first word in its headlines lest anyone miss the point that feeding hungry people is very “controversial.”
“Controversial new U.S. and Israel-backed Gaza aid effort gets off to a slow, tumultuous start”, the AP blared. “Controversial US and Israel-backed aid group starts operations in Gaza,” Sky News agitated and there were even fake...
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Food from Jewish hands is obviously tainted and forbidden to Mohammedans. It is all pork, as it were. Jews offering tainted food is deeply insulting to MSM/Hamas.
15-20 well-placed tactical nukes would fix a lot of problems.
Don't need nukes. Mach 10 missiles would do the job just fine.
bump
imho, the only thing “controversial” about the massive Israeli re-supplying and feeding of the enemy Occupying Gaza is just how STUPID it is
never before in human history has an invaded or terrorized nation ever provided thousands of tons of free food and provisions and supplies to the enemy (at least, not before the enemy surrenders like the one clear exception to this statement, the Marshall Plan after Germany surrendered WW2)
I’m sick of hearing the term “humanitarian” tossed around in this context, too. If anyone were at ALL concerned about humanitarianism they’d be clamoring for Egypt to open its blockade and let their Fakestinian bretheran leave the area of hostilities. But no, we seldom hear much at all about Egypt’s role in any of this, do we?
OK, that sounds good.
Egypt has tens of thousands of troops with armor in the Sinai and next to Gaza to prevent Palestinians from invading Egypt. The troop buildup has been in the news.
True, and all those Egyptian troops and tanks are in direct violation of the peace treaty.
If they aren’t removed and the Egyptian border opened to normal traffic and commerce, the IDF may have to fix the situation.
The media is Hamas
The UN is Hamas
not hard to control the UN when so many Muslim countries have a vote
The media treats the UN as if it were neutral and objective
no surprise since they are both Hamas and on the same side of misinformation
Calling the news media “Hamas” is enraging and insulting to the real Hamas terrorists.
Their taunting home made videos since the days of Osama bin Laden have always garnered much higher ratings than MSNBC or CNN.
Not to mention “Baghdad Bob” (Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf). Made Wolf Blitzer’s and Brian Stelter’s look like a high school 100 watt practice station’s ratings. And were more reliably fact based.
When it benefits Hamas, the media claims that Gaza is starving. And, when it benefits Hamas, the media denounces sending aid to Gaza as “controversial”. Then it fakes a massacre.
Late ping to Mr Greenfield's excellent article posted yesterday.
Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! list.
As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.
Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog
IF one - just ONE real person in Gaza starved to death it would be on the front page of the New York Times and Washington Post for months - maybe years.. That's how we know it has NEVER happened...
The hell with it. Time for the IDF to level Gaza once and for all and turn it into the world’s largest drifting course
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.