Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Supreme Court lets Trump revoke 'parole' status for migrants
Reuters ^ | May 30, 2025 2:38 PM UTC | Andrew Chung

Posted on 05/30/2025 11:11:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Summary

May 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations.

The court put on hold Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani order halting the administration's move to end the immigration "parole" granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts.

As with many of the court's orders issued in an emergency fashion, the decision was unsigned and gave no reasoning. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, publicly dissented.

The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending the litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion.

The outcome, Jackson wrote, "undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending."

Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for "urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit," allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach by to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border.

Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the...

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/30/2025 11:11:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The tariff decision and this indicates the court will likely overrule district courts nationwide rulings, I hope.


2 posted on 05/30/2025 11:13:46 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Notice the use of the word “lets”?

Like this is some special privilege that only he gets...


3 posted on 05/30/2025 11:14:25 AM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Contrary to the relevant sections of the Constitution, we now have 10 Chief Executives instead of just ONE!


4 posted on 05/30/2025 11:16:56 AM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Hoc Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

I saw that too. The word should have been “affirmed.”

76,000 Honduras TPS beneficiaries will run out this July. The extension was done by Biden in September 2024.

They are here from Hurricane Mitch in 1998!!


5 posted on 05/30/2025 11:18:45 AM PDT by Salvavida (NS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“”US Supreme Court lets Trump revoke ‘parole’ status for migrants””

US Supreme Court supports President Trump’s revocation of the Hussein/Biden Regime illegal ‘parole’ status for illegal trespassers, too many of whom continue to terrorize.

There, fixed it.


6 posted on 05/30/2025 11:20:05 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wait until a District Judge overrules the Supreme Court


7 posted on 05/30/2025 11:21:10 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bull Hockey! SCOTUS AFFIRMED POTUS AUTHORITY ON THIS ISSUE. They did not let him do anything not already in his job description. That we are litigating the POTUS duty description, Congress needs to have the Senate affirm his duties, putting them about the third branch who is in dissent/lawfare resistance.


8 posted on 05/30/2025 11:23:09 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Wait until a District Judge overrules the Supreme Court

Exactly. It ain’t over until a lowly and obscure (and preferably foreign-born) leftist district judge says it’s over!

9 posted on 05/30/2025 11:53:32 AM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The democrats have used a number of fictions to circumvent US Code, Title 8, from (BS) “political asylum” to DACA—which they insisted calling “Dreamers” trying as usual to control the language (though Durbib’s ‘Dream’ act failed) because DACAns sounds like (gulp) aliens.
The Kenyan even tried to get DAPA: an exception for illegal parents(!)
It’s past time for some Fife bud-nipping of this lawlessness by dems and their cheap labor RINO allies.


10 posted on 05/30/2025 11:57:00 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher

Their judges are the open borders scofflaws’ last defense against their violations of Title 8.
The irony: they look to biased judges to extend their lawlessness.


11 posted on 05/30/2025 11:59:12 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

“””Notice the use of the word “lets”?

Like this is some special privilege that only he gets...””

That was mighty white of them to allow him to do the job he was hired to do.


12 posted on 05/30/2025 12:16:09 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

13 posted on 05/30/2025 12:19:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The moron troll Ted Holden believes that humans originated on Ganymede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The ruling against Trump on this claimed that the parole status must be given or revoked by a comprehensive process. Trump’s lawyers can argue the paroles are null and void on that basis alone because they were not granted through a comprehensive process, Myorkas just handed them out.


14 posted on 05/30/2025 1:14:49 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

I wonder how many of these Humanitarian Parolees are still receiving SSI (up to $2100/mo) and other Gov Bennies . It was supposed to be for only 7 years. Biden extended the term and offered maximum limit on SSI $


15 posted on 05/30/2025 1:29:51 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“lets”? no dumb(donkey) reporter, they affirmed he always could.


16 posted on 05/30/2025 1:48:53 PM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

It is we the people who do the “letting” by who we approve of come election time. Trump’s posture of subservience to the judiciary is quite troubling and needs to end pronto. In essence, he is “letting” them steal the power of we the people GUARANTEED to us in Article IV, Section 4. Enforce the Constitution, Mr Trump. You swore an oath to do so.


17 posted on 05/30/2025 2:23:55 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"US Supreme Court lets Trump revoke 'parole' status for migrants"

It is no accident there are continuous headlines pointing out what the Supreme Court allows this President to do.

18 posted on 05/30/2025 3:51:37 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson