Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/28/2025 5:03:25 PM PDT by george76
District materials highlight a decrease in A grades for ‘more privileged’ students..
Without seeking approval of the San Francisco Board of Education, Superintendent of Schools Maria Su plans to unveil a new Grading for Equity plan on Tuesday that will go into effect this fall at 14 high schools and cover over 10,000 students. The school district is already negotiating with an outside consultant to train teachers in August in a system that awards a passing C grade to as low as a score of 41 on a 100-point exam.
Were it not for an intrepid school board member, the drastic change in grading with implications for college admissions and career readiness would have gone unnoticed and unexplained. It is buried in a three-word phrase on the last page of a PowerPoint presentation embedded in the school board meeting’s 25-page agenda. The plan comes during the last week of the spring semester while parents are assessing the impact of over $100 million in budget reductions and deciding whether to remain in the public schools this fall. While the school district acknowledges that parent aversion to this grading approach is typically high and understands the need for “vigilant communication,” outreach to parents has been minimal and may be nonexistent. The school district’s Office of Equity homepage does not mention it and a page containing the SFUSD definition of equity has not been updated in almost three years.
Grading for Equity eliminates homework or weekly tests from being counted in a student’s final semester grade. All that matters is how the student scores on a final examination, which can be taken multiple times. Students can be late turning in an assignment or showing up to class or not showing up at all without it affecting their academic grade. Currently, a student needs a 90 for an A and at least 61 for a D. Under the San Leandro Unified School District’s grading for equity system touted by the San Francisco Unified School District and its consultant, a student with a score as low as 80 can attain an A and as low as 21 can pass with a D.
Joe Feldman, the consultant the school district plans to contract with to implement Grading for Equity, wrote in 2019 that in Placer County, another jurisdiction with the grading system, “students who did not qualify for free or reduced-price lunch had a sharper decrease in A’s, reflecting how traditional grading practices disproportionately benefit students with resources because of the inequitable inclusion of extra credit and other resource-dependent grading criteria.”
Grading for Equity may reduce A and D/F grades and, according to Feldman, enable a school district to cut costs for remedial classes but what about student academic outcomes? The most recent data from both middle schools in San Leandro where grading reform started in 2016 document significant continued disparities among student populations when it comes to performance on statewide assessment tests. In both English and mathematics, the gaps ranged from twice to triple to even four times as many students meeting or exceeding the statewide standard in some subgroups compared to others. The children needing the most help and improvement are not getting it.
The school district has long expressed its commitment to teaching “the whole child.” Grading for Equity de-emphasizes the importance of timely performance, completion of assignments, and consistent attendance. These are all elements essential for students to be college and career ready when they graduate.
Grading for Equity de-emphasizes the importance of timely performance, completion of assignments, and consistent attendance.
Grading for Equity also contradicts one of the Superintendent’s responsibilities (what the school district calls “guardrails”) “not [to] allow curriculum and instruction that is not rooted in excellence. . . .” While teachers will have a choice to utilize Grading for Equity this fall, students and parents may not. Even if students transfer to a classroom with a traditional grading system, they cannot escape the impact the experiment will have on class ranking, scholarship access, daily study habits or assignments. For teachers, one of the school district’s interim goals is to set a target for students to get a C grade or higher in the new system. That should be easier under Grading for Equity because the system lowers the threshold for a C grade. But will the student learn more or be more ready for college and career?
A larger question is whether advancing Grading for Equity represents a shift back toward policies such as ending eighth-grade algebra and Lowell High School academic admissions. School board members responsible for those policies were recalled. Superintendent Su is owning this policy as her staff has informed the school board it has no formal authority to accept or reject it. Parents and students have suffered mightily through all the school district changes over the past few years while voters as a whole have invested heavily in bond and ballot measures to help the schools. Such a drastic and dramatic change in the high school grading system merits greater attention and scrutiny than given by the school district up to now.
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Just give every student straight As. Can’t get more equitable than that.
Improved performance through lowered expectations.
Why bother go to school at all? Just deem every student to be at genius level and save billions of dollars.
We built this city on rock and equity
Yep. Award a Ph.D. at birth to every baby and be done with it.
Parents who truly hate their children send them to Public School.
Parents who want to murder their children pick San Francisco Public Schools.
The movie Idiocracy gets closer to reality every day.
Harvard has already been doing this for years. Their average grade point average in the undergrad schools was 2.5 in 1960. Now with lower academic admissions standards for a large part of their DEI student body the average grade point average has been 3.7. Basically, they are curving most of the student body up to an A without regard to performance and test scores. Summa cum laude for everyone even the ones taking remedial 5th grade math.
Go shwoogs!
“and as low as 21 can pass with a D.”
With the right social justice activism, that will get them into Harvard.
And AI will replace every one of these students... All future Democrats.
If California wanted to hasten the departure of the middle class, they couldn’t be doing a better job of it. For over a decade, the middle class has been moving out of California, leaving only the insulated wealthy, and the global poor. The rich don’t send their kids to public schools, and the poor have no option. Those in the middle can still vote with their feet, and are.
“Improved performance through lowered expectations”.
Winning post of the thread. You nailed it perfectly.
Preferably put the orphanages in the Mojave Desert where escapees would not be a threat. Maybe the state could find people who would actually love them and help them.
About 25-30% of school age San Franciscans are private or home schooled. This should increase the trend.
I’m glad. Our schools are moral cesspools. Poor kids.
who knew you skin color will shift your test scores up or down
pretty sure this is called racism and discrimination
This ping list is for the other articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)
The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
Grading equity is giving every student, regardless of who they are, the grades they earned for the work they put in.
My reading is it is not just grade inflation, some students (white, Asian) currently getting A’s are going to get B’s.
Maff and shit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.