Posted on 04/20/2025 1:43:32 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
(Reuters) -A U.S. judge barred the Trump administration from rapidly deporting hundreds if not thousands of migrants to countries other than their own without giving them a chance to show they fear being persecuted, tortured or killed there.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's preliminary injunction on Friday was the latest setback to an immigration crackdown launched by President Donald Trump when he took office on January 20.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
Time for Trump to bring this to a head by ignoring all except the supreme court and telling them he is doing it because they have no constitutional power to make these decisions.
Trump can simply declare a national emergency being that we have been invaded by tens of millions of un-vetted foreign nationals, and that would completely put the brakes on this judicial meddling.
(Trump can simply declare a national emergency being that we have been invaded by tens of millions of un-vetted foreign nationals)
Why he hasn’t already done so?
And the great replacement remains. Seems like nothing can stop this national suicide. Time for a Convention Of States while it is still possible.
Gee... I wonder how this judge gained so much courage to do such a thing?
Funny that the Biden Administration didn’t have to follow or enforce laws when thousands were crossing the boarder illegally but Trump has to bend over backwards to get them out.
I love how the wishful thinking headlines keep reporting that another judge has halted, blocked, reversed or ruled against another one of President Trump’s executive orders.
But as far as I can tell, he’s respectfully ignoring them.
None of these judges objected to the open borders and the Biden flights of the “Worst of the Worst” into the country. These judges are accomplices in treason and should be treated as such.
Send all illegals to the judges neighborhood.
In the event of invasion the President has extraordinary powers.
Why he hasn’t exercised those powers I have no explanation.
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
However, I keep going back to Arizona v. U.S. which was decided under Obama and held in part that:
"The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens. See Toll v. Moreno, 458 U. S. 1, 10 (1982); see generally S. Legomsky & C. Rodríguez, Immigration and Refugee Law and Policy 115–132 (5th ed. 2009). This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s constitutional power to “establish an uniform Rule of Nat- uralization,” U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and its inher- ent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations, see Toll, supra, at 10 (citing United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U. S. 304, 318 (1936)).
The federal power to determine immigration policy is well settled. Immigration policy can affect trade, investment, tourism, and diplomatic relations for the entire Nation, as well as the perceptions and expectations of aliens in this country who seek the full protection of its laws. See, e.g., Brief for Argentina et al. as Amici Curiae; see also Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U. S. 580, 588–589 (1952). Perceived mistreatment of aliens in the United States may lead to harmful reciprocal treatment of American citizens abroad. See Brief for Madeleine K. Albright et al. as Amici Curiae 24–30.
It is fundamental that foreign countries concerned about the status, safety, and security of their nationals in the United States must be able to confer and communicate on this subject with one national sovereign, not the 50 separate States. See Chy Lung v. Freeman, 92 U. S. 275, 279–280 (1876); see also The Federalist No. 3, p. 39 (C. Rossiter ed. 2003) (J. Jay) (observing that federal power would be necessary in part because “bordering States . . . under the impulse of sudden irritation, and a quick sense of apparent interest or injury” might take action that would undermine foreign relations). This Court has reaffirmed that “[o]ne of the most important and delicate of all international relationships . . . has to do with the protection of the just rights of a country’s own nationals when those nationals are in another country.” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U. S. 52, 64 (1941).
Federal governance of immigration and alien status is extensive and complex. Congress has specified categories of aliens who may not be admitted to the United States. See 8 U. S. C. §1182. Unlawful entry and unlawful reentry into the country are federal offenses. §§1325, 1326. Once here, aliens are required to register with the Federal Government and to carry proof of status on their person. See §§1301–1306. Failure to do so is a federal misdemeanor. §§1304(e), 1306(a). Federal law also authorizes States to deny noncitizens a range of public benefits, §1622; and it imposes sanctions on employers who hire unauthorized workers, §1324a.
Congress has specified which aliens may be removed from the United States and the procedures for doing so. Aliens may be removed if they were inadmissible at the time of entry, have been convicted of certain crimes, or meet other criteria set by federal law. See §1227. Re- moval is a civil, not criminal, matter. A principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials. See Brief for Former Commissioners of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service as Amici Curiae 8–13 (hereinafter Brief for Former INS Commissioners). Federal officials, as an initial matter, must decide whether it makes sense to pursue removal at all. If removal proceedings commence, aliens may seek asylum and other discretionary relief allowing them to remain in the country or at least to leave without formal removal. See §1229a(c)(4); see also, e.g., §§1158 (asylum), 1229b (cancellation of removal), 1229c (voluntary departure)."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
I wonder who his White House counsel is? They’re giving him bad advice.
In the event of invasion the President has extraordinary powers.
Why he hasn’t exercised those powers I have no explanation.
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
That is exactly what Trump is attempting to do under the Alien Enemies Act. The left is trying to stop him via the courts.
Another illegal action from the royal judicial ruling branch. Again Congre$$ and the Supreme Clowns of the US are continuing to fail the American people.
These perp-protecting judges all belong to a party with a 25% approval rating.
They are all going against the will of the people and a duly elected president for 25% of voters????
Something really stinks here.
Who’s paying them?
Citing immigration law is a red-herring.
This isn’t about ‘immigration’, this is a military invasion sans uniforms.
That puts it in the realm of the military and national security.
The risk of destroying ANY opportunities for deportation by doing that is that the USSC currently is 7-2, Deep State supporters. Once they get a chance to shut ALL deportations down (now...they effectively allow non-citizens to use our laws and Constitutionally-reserved for CITIZENS Framers' intent), that's the end of ALL deportations, effectively. Foot-dragging on a case by case basis is totally for the benefit of LAWYERS, paid for by U.S. Citizen taxpayers.
I'm hoping returning to the Old West style of Justice returns to the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.