Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Boasberg Makes His Next Move After Supreme Court Vacates His Orders Barring Trump From Deporting Venezuelan Gang Members Under Alien Enemies Act
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Apr. 8, 2025 11:40 | by Cristina Laila

Posted on 04/08/2025 10:01:53 AM PDT by bitt

Judge James Boasberg made his next move in the Alien Enemies Act case on Tuesday after the Supreme Court vacated his orders.

In an unsigned order, the US Supreme Court on Monday vacated Judge Boasberg’s orders barring the Trump Administration’s removals of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

Last month, Judge Boasberg granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) to stop the Trump administration from deporting thousands of Venezuelan nationals believed to be members of Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang under the Alien Enemies Act.

Far-left America-hating leftist groups, such as the ACLU and Democracy Forward, rushed to a DC court in a desperate bid to shield dangerous illegal aliens from deportation.

The high court said Boasberg lacked jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court however, said the Administration must give reasonable notice for gang members to challenge their deportations in court.

Five Supreme court Justices, Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas and Alito were in favor of vacating Boasberg’s orders.

The three liberal justices Kagan, Jackson and Sotomayor dissented – ‘conservative’ justice Amy Coney Barret dissented in part.

On Tuesday morning Boasberg canceled the scheduled hearing on the Alien Enemies Act, however, he gave the deported Venezuelan gang members another chance to pursue a preliminary injunction!

Boasberg seized on the Supreme Court’s position allowing the deported gang members to challenge their removal in court.

“In yesterday’s ruling vacating this Court’s TROs, the Supreme Court held that Plaintiffs cannot be deported under the Alien Enemies Act without an opportunity to challenge their removal in federal court. It also determined that the appropriate venue for such proceedings is the Southern District of Texas or wherever Plaintiffs are currently held,” Boasberg wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: alienenemiesact; article2; boasberg; conflictofinterest; interference; judgeboasberg; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; noauthority; nojurisdiction; obstruction; scotus; supremecourt; undermining; unlawfulorders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2025 10:01:53 AM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 04/08/2025 10:02:05 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

This “judge” must be getting paid huge bucks by Soros for him to continue with the stupidity he has going against Trump and the SCOTUS...


3 posted on 04/08/2025 10:05:52 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; Chode; sport; Steely Tom

His next move? He’s on the beach pounding sand?


4 posted on 04/08/2025 10:06:31 AM PDT by Morgana ( “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.” — Alice Paul 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

That fact that Federal Judges are “moving moves” confirms they are pure political actors.


5 posted on 04/08/2025 10:06:56 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Correct.

He must be removed by whatever means is available.
If there are no means available, then he simply must be removed permanently.


6 posted on 04/08/2025 10:08:39 AM PDT by dadgum (Fight to WIN or do not fight all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Just another hateful narcissist.


7 posted on 04/08/2025 10:09:29 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

That fact that Federal Judges are “moving moves” confirms they are pure political actors.

~~~

That was my reaction.

Why does a judge need to have “moves”??


8 posted on 04/08/2025 10:09:57 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Roberts gave this treasonous prick a back door and now he is driving a tank through it. I believe Roberts did this intentionally.


9 posted on 04/08/2025 10:11:24 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

“2) ‘Plaintiffs shall file a Notice by April 16, 2025, indicating whether they believe that they still have a basis to proceed on their Motion for Preliminary Injunction in this Court and, if so, proposing a briefing schedule,’ Boasberg said.”

The judge wants to be in charge of this case so badly.


10 posted on 04/08/2025 10:11:36 AM PDT by unlearner (Still not tired of winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

So the courts ran Eisenhowers operation wet back?


11 posted on 04/08/2025 10:12:48 AM PDT by TalBlack (Their god is government. Prepare for a religious war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt

Roberts and ACB need to be removed from the SC....


12 posted on 04/08/2025 10:13:14 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bitt

This is not a case...it is a reprimand.


13 posted on 04/08/2025 10:13:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Yep, most definitely a Soros plant..one of many.


14 posted on 04/08/2025 10:14:26 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
His next move?

His next move? Testing the tensile strength of hemp rope suspended from a tree.

15 posted on 04/08/2025 10:14:52 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

I suppose, maybe. But I just don’t buy the facile theory that these people act because they’ve been paid off. When I hear hoofbeats I think horses, not zebras. We see all across our politics fanatical leftists acting out their beliefs. My read is that’s what animates this judge

That said, typical GP hype and bs here. True the judge was b***h slapped by SCOTUS, but I think this is a perfectly appropriate final step before closing up shop in this case. Judges never like being reversed, particularly with a slap, like a ruling that he lacked jurisdiction to do any of his antics. Likewise the boys and girls on the DC Circuit that upheld him. This slap was pretty hard, and the implication of the article that he’s looking for a way to act that would result in a second, harder, slap, is just ridiculous


16 posted on 04/08/2025 10:14:55 AM PDT by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Their only recourse is to file in Texas...kinda spoils the "Judge shopping" scenario. lol

The judge has no choice. The DC case is closed.

Is he saying that 5 members of the USSC are stupid??

17 posted on 04/08/2025 10:21:29 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

What actions might we see from this judge, post USSC rebuke #1, that would prompt a second and more severe slapdown from the US Supremes?


18 posted on 04/08/2025 10:23:10 AM PDT by desertsolitaire (asques)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Probably correct.


19 posted on 04/08/2025 10:23:57 AM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Arrest. This judge under Section 8 SS 1324.


20 posted on 04/08/2025 10:24:49 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson