Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled in the North Carolina Supreme Court race that 65,000 voters must prove they were eligible to vote, or face removal from the count.
X ^ | 4/4/25 | The Calvin Coolidge Project

Posted on 04/04/2025 12:06:27 PM PDT by hardspunned

The Democrat leads there only by 700 votes. They have 15 days to prove they are eligible to vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: northcarolina; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
That’s going to save this race from the fraudsters!

From Grok:

Yes, on April 4, 2025, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued a ruling in a split decision, ordering over 60,000 voters to prove their eligibility within 15 days in the contested 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court race between Republican Jefferson Griffin and Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs. Griffin, who trails Riggs by 734 votes (a margin confirmed by two recounts), has challenged approximately 65,000 ballots, arguing that they were cast by ineligible voters, primarily due to incomplete voter registrations lacking a driver's license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number.

1 posted on 04/04/2025 12:06:27 PM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Wait a minute - I thought Democrats always had a 65,000 vote advantage going into every election. What changed?


2 posted on 04/04/2025 12:11:18 PM PDT by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

They might need to do this to the Cheeseheads also. Find out why more people voted for the Voter I.D. than voted for the skanky judge.


3 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:36 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (First covid case confirmed in America. 01/19/2021. Biden inaugurated 01/20/2021. Coinkydink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I don’t understand. Once the ballots are added to the pot, how are they taken back out? They become unidentifiable.


4 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:53 PM PDT by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That’s my question. How is that even possible to pull ballots?


5 posted on 04/04/2025 12:14:51 PM PDT by Gahanna Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

65k to 65 million built in advantage and in their minds.


6 posted on 04/04/2025 12:16:06 PM PDT by wally_bert (I cannot be sured for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

If they are absentee or mail in ballots, and are physically preserved, they can be removed from the count if ineligible.


7 posted on 04/04/2025 12:17:18 PM PDT by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

They may have been accepted as provisional ballots on Election Day, which means they are segregated from the rest of the ballots and counted separately.


8 posted on 04/04/2025 12:18:01 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The gallows wait for martyrs whose papers are in order.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Good point.


9 posted on 04/04/2025 12:18:30 PM PDT by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: philippa

But, the ballot box is ensured to be secret. If they can identify a ballot that has been included in the count already, that violates anonymity.


10 posted on 04/04/2025 12:20:39 PM PDT by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Maybe anonymity can be violated in order to prove ineligibility.


11 posted on 04/04/2025 12:34:03 PM PDT by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Can the court require fake voters to verify their eligibility if they are not real and cannot be charged?


12 posted on 04/04/2025 12:43:22 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Or from the US?


13 posted on 04/04/2025 12:48:29 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

If only Wisconsin had those stones!


14 posted on 04/04/2025 1:01:26 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

Why were they allowed to vote with inccomplete information?


15 posted on 04/04/2025 1:07:19 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters (You can't remove RINOs by voting for them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArcadeQuarters

Why were they allowed to vote with inccomplete information?


That’s the only way Demoncrap wins.


16 posted on 04/04/2025 1:08:59 PM PDT by nesnah (Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned
How the HELL can those 65,000 people get registered when they fail to provide the simplest and most basic ID? All you need is a NC Driver License or the LAST FOUR of a SS Number.

But how good is providing the LAST FOUR of your SS number? Grok: "When you register to vote in North Carolina, you can provide either a driver’s license/DMV ID number or the last four digits of your SSN. The state’s voter registration form (online or paper) doesn’t require you to submit the full SSN, and there’s no real-time validation of those last four digits against the Social Security Administration (SSA) database during the application process. So, technically, you could input any four-digit combination, and the form would accept it as long as it meets the format.

Grok says checks are done later to verify the last four and you will be in big trouble if you actually voted with made-up last four. But, by the tine the matching check is completed, the election has been stolen.

17 posted on 04/04/2025 1:11:48 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I guess they just go online and add, change, delete, whatever. Must be a Dominion operation.


18 posted on 04/04/2025 1:17:45 PM PDT by hardspunned (Look for the“Putin Stooge” libel, news from Ukraine you’ve gradually grown to trust over 30 months s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

They tried to steal this one even though we finally rammed voter id down liberals throats here in NC we had to amend the constitution to do it but we finally have mandatory voter id. Now just think without that how would this race have been decided. The dem would have won


19 posted on 04/04/2025 1:36:35 PM PDT by cdpap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

GREAT!

NOW, ON TO WISCONSIN!


20 posted on 04/04/2025 2:47:39 PM PDT by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! SUPPORT THE FAIRTAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson