Posted on 04/03/2025 8:19:33 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
After you finish this blog, you’ll be asking the million-dollar question: Why is Chief Justice John Roberts hanging out with the Deep State’s #1 color revolution architect?
Turns out the left’s favorite “Republican” has some very interesting buddies.
According to Norm Eisen—the man who practically wrote the Deep State’s playbook on color revolutions, all things anti-Trump, and lawfare in the US—he and Chief Justice John Roberts are not only good pals, but they even spent a week together in the Czech Republic. According to Norm, the two BFFs were there working on “American rule of law” issues.
Hmm…
Norm was so proud of this that he actually bragged about the trip and made it very clear that Roberts isn’t corrupt—he’s just a “close friend” who happened to fly overseas and stay at Eisen’s posh 150-room palace to collaborate on transatlantic political projects.
Really…
And no, that’s not just weird; it’s a massive conflict of interest and could also explain a lot.
As it stands now, Justice Roberts has no business presiding over any of the cases that Eisen and his army of lawfare activists are funneling through the courts, and we all know Norm is tied to so many of these weaponized cases. He should have been recusing himself from the get-go—and probably outright resigning—for the integrity of the court.
Mike Benz told the shocking full story on a recent podcast.
Watch:
Yes, Mike Benz amplified this bombshell story, but he made sure to credit the X account that first dug it up:
Norm Eisen said his good friend Supreme Court Justice John Roberts was not corrupt and that John went to the Czech Republic for a week so that they could spend time working on American rule of law issues together.
(Excerpt) Read more at revolver.news ...
Jorge Bush.
Ooooopsie
Bttt.
5.56mm
Well since this is known. I assume assets monitor his communications as well?
Roberts cannot hide his allegiances in this regard. So this connection should be repeated everytime he is nrought up.
I always thought it was Epstein Island
bttt
🎼The Golden Girls theme song
“Epstein Island”
“Eisen Palace”
WTF? What possible reason would a SCOTUS justice have to work on any political projects much less "transatlantic" political projects?
Roberts should absolutely resign!
more...
3 April: Real America’s Voice: Youtube: 13mins: BOMBSHELL: Norm Eisen Met With Justice Roberts To Influence American And EU “Rule Of Law Issues”
Natalie Winters interviews Mike Benz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjySVT6ml6Y
Circle back for Benz video thanx for posting link
Benz shows part of the following in the shorter video:
18 March 2019: HLS: The Last Palace and the Next Battle
Norman Eisen ’91 tells the epic story of democracy’s long victory in Europe through a house’s history—and his mother’s life
by Erick Trickey
A senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, Eisen is a CNN commentator specializing in corruption, scandal and crime. Chair of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, he’s working with Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe ’66 on legal challenges to President Trump under the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause. His second book, in progress, will argue that Trump is undermining the rule of law. “If we fight—and that’s a big if—democracy is always stronger than illiberalism,” Eisen says...
https://hls.harvard.edu/today/the-last-palace-and-the-next-battle/
Brand new Supreme Court justices should be provided with two documents: A copy of the Constitution and a copy of the Federalist Papers, and that’s it. If they feel the need to go beyond those, they may refer only to the writings of those who were directly involved in drafting the Constitution, but no one after that, and it should be made clear that their own personal feelings or opinions are 100% irrelevant. Needless to say, application of foreign law or foreign legal principles would be beyond absurd and forbidden.
If done properly, the job of a Supreme Court justice should be dead simple. All they should be tasked with is to review cases and determine whether the law was applied according to the original intent of the Constitution. Not according to some extra-constitutional notion of “rule of law principles”, and especially not according to their personal opinion of what the proper outcome should be from a public policy standpoint. The only opinions that should matter are the opinions of those “old dead white men” who wrote the document.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.