Skip to comments.
BREAKING: 8 Year-Long Curling v. Raffensperger Federal Lawsuit on Electronic Voting Machines DISMISSED on Standing
Gateway Pundit ^
| April 01, 2025
| Staff
Posted on 04/01/2025 8:52:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Red Badger
Suckers. We’re all suckers!
To: Red Badger
Another lowlife female “judgey” protecting VOTER FRAUD. It’s all her fascist Democrat comrades have to use to steal elections.
3
posted on
04/01/2025 8:55:40 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's great that 27 year old Karoline Leavitt has every Democrat on the planet peeing their Depends.)
To: Red Badger
Absurdity on center stage.
4
posted on
04/01/2025 8:55:46 AM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: Red Badger
Hmmm...
Totenberg. Totenberg. Now where have I heard that name?
Oh, yeah. She has a sister: Nina Totenberg—a correspondent for NPR.
Hmmm...
To: blackdog
Is there some route of Appeal, on a “lacks Standing” Judgement?
6
posted on
04/01/2025 8:59:00 AM PDT
by
traditional2
("Is it them, again, Yogi?")
To: Red Badger
Well then, Boasberg doesn’t have “standing” to restrict Trump’s EOs. Because I said so.
7
posted on
04/01/2025 8:59:01 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(Banned from Breitbart)
To: Red Badger
Sue her for legal fees. She should have determined standing AT THE BEGINNING of the trial.
8
posted on
04/01/2025 8:59:34 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: traditional2
I don’t know if there is a route of appeal on standing. There should be. The USSC needs to step in and affirm a voter’s right to have his/her vote secure and counted
The other option is for Congress to step in and fund a new mandatory process and set of procedures for observers, equipment testing etc.
9
posted on
04/01/2025 9:04:48 AM PDT
by
monkeyshine
(live and let live is dead)
To: Red Badger
Judge Amy Totenberg issued her ruling over a year after the trial concluded, determining that “the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.” It took a year for the Judgette to decide this?
They could not file their appeal until she ruled, so she drug it out as long as she could, bring "Justice delayed is justice denied" to a whole new level.
10
posted on
04/01/2025 9:06:46 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
To: traditional2
Cute reversal of the usual where the plaintiff(R) “lacks standing.”
11
posted on
04/01/2025 9:16:26 AM PDT
by
sopo
To: Red Badger
We’ve tried the soapbox. We’ve tried the ballot box. Let them keep pushing.
12
posted on
04/01/2025 9:20:14 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Perfection is impossible. But if you pursue perfection...you may achieve excellence.)
To: traditional2
A case on an active federal court docket for eight years of process that concludes on lack of standing, is in itself a verdict. Think about it.
13
posted on
04/01/2025 9:23:32 AM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
Nina Totenberg—a correspondent for NPR.
AH, yes. The Nina Totenberg who wanted all the women in the USA to buy President Clinton kneepads.
14
posted on
04/01/2025 9:23:48 AM PDT
by
wbarmy
(Trying to do better.)
To: struggle
Good point. How can the Judge rule that way after the trial has concluded.
15
posted on
04/01/2025 9:27:11 AM PDT
by
vivenne
(7Come to think of it. )
To: Red Badger; 9YearLurker; blackdog; traditional2; struggle; bk1000
16
posted on
04/01/2025 9:27:24 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: Red Badger
It took her 8 years to figure out that she didn't have jurisdiction? And a full year after the trial concluded for this fraud judge to issue that ruling?
We don't have a legal system in this country. We have a system rigged to enable Democrat party rule even when the people have specifically rejected it.
17
posted on
04/01/2025 9:27:44 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
To: Red Badger
Amazing how there is no standing when the lawsuit is against the corrupt establishment but if Trump so much as breaks wind, there is magically standing for anything any federal district court judge wants to claim he or she has power over.
18
posted on
04/01/2025 9:41:09 AM PDT
by
FLT-bird
To: Red Badger
another lawfare road block
19
posted on
04/01/2025 9:43:15 AM PDT
by
thinden
(Buckle up …..)
To: Red Badger
The DOJ should take up the case. My guess is that with the case being dismissed then the statue of limitations now kicks in. Maybe that was the whole point of dragging it on so long.
20
posted on
04/01/2025 9:57:50 AM PDT
by
Revel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson