Posted on 04/01/2025 8:52:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
The 8-year-long federal lawsuit seeking to ban voting systems in the State of Georgia that store a voter’s intent on a QR code rather than human-verifiable text has ended today.
Judge Amy Totenberg issued her ruling over a year after the trial concluded, determining that “the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.”
The Gateway Pundit covered this trial from Day 1 in court, witnessing several egregious manipulations of the voting system demonstrated live and on the record in the courtroom.
University of Michigan computer science professor Dr. J. Alex Halderman successfully hacked the Dominion ICX system in court using a BIC pen in one hack and tools you can purchase on Amazon for several other hacks.
The hacks resulted in the ballots printing human-readable text that were inconsistent with the voter's intent. In other words, if you voted for Candidate A, the hack would cause the ballot to print from the ballot marking device showing a vote for Candidate B. The QR code would also record the vote as a vote for Candidate B.
However, most shockingly, Dr. Halderman was able to completely render the voter's own confirmation of their choice. The human-readable text could be manipulated to show a vote correctly for Candidate A. But when the ballot is tabulated, the QR code shows a vote for Candidate B.
The link below contains links inside the article to the preceding articles on the "Halderman Hack":
The Gateway Pundit will follow-up after the 33-page decision from Judge Totenberg is thoroughly reviewed.
One thing is certainly clear though: how on earth did this case progress for eight years, a 17-day trial, and a 14-month long lull from Judge Totenberg in rendering a decision?
Suckers. We’re all suckers!
Another lowlife female “judgey” protecting VOTER FRAUD. It’s all her fascist Democrat comrades have to use to steal elections.
Absurdity on center stage.
Hmmm...
Totenberg. Totenberg. Now where have I heard that name?
Oh, yeah. She has a sister: Nina Totenberg—a correspondent for NPR.
Hmmm...
Is there some route of Appeal, on a “lacks Standing” Judgement?
Well then, Boasberg doesn’t have “standing” to restrict Trump’s EOs. Because I said so.
Sue her for legal fees. She should have determined standing AT THE BEGINNING of the trial.
I don’t know if there is a route of appeal on standing. There should be. The USSC needs to step in and affirm a voter’s right to have his/her vote secure and counted
The other option is for Congress to step in and fund a new mandatory process and set of procedures for observers, equipment testing etc.
It took a year for the Judgette to decide this?
They could not file their appeal until she ruled, so she drug it out as long as she could, bring "Justice delayed is justice denied" to a whole new level.
Cute reversal of the usual where the plaintiff(R) “lacks standing.”
We’ve tried the soapbox. We’ve tried the ballot box. Let them keep pushing.
A case on an active federal court docket for eight years of process that concludes on lack of standing, is in itself a verdict. Think about it.
Good point. How can the Judge rule that way after the trial has concluded.
Judge [Amy Totenkopf]: Georgia voters [Soros] can challenge Greene’s reelection run
aol ^ | April 19, 2022
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4056185/posts
Amazing how there is no standing when the lawsuit is against the corrupt establishment but if Trump so much as breaks wind, there is magically standing for anything any federal district court judge wants to claim he or she has power over.
another lawfare road block
The DOJ should take up the case. My guess is that with the case being dismissed then the statue of limitations now kicks in. Maybe that was the whole point of dragging it on so long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.