Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Denies Trump’s Effort to Ban Trannies From Military
The Liberty Daily ^ | March 26, 2025 | Jacob Burg, The Epoch Times

Posted on 03/27/2025 6:25:16 AM PDT by Red Badger

(The Epoch Times)—A federal judge on March 26 denied the Trump administration’s motion to dissolve her order that prevents the Pentagon from blocking transgender people from enlisting in the military, which was scheduled to go into effect on Friday.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes filed a memorandum opinion and order on Wednesday denying the administration’s request to dissolve, or stay pending appeal, her March 18 preliminary injunction halting the new military policy.

The government filed an appeal after Reye’s Wednesday order.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness” on Jan. 27 that says individuals “expressing a false gender identity” do not meet the standards for military service and that “adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual’s sex conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle.”

On March 18, Reyes ruled that Trump’s order likely violates the constitutional rights of transgender-identifying active-duty service members who challenged the order and could cause them irreparable harm. She agreed to stay the preliminary injunction until March 21 to give the administration enough time to appeal.

“Indeed, the cruel irony is that thousands of transgender service members have sacrificed—some risking their lives—to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the Military Ban seeks to deny them,” Reyes stated in a 79-page ruling.

During a March 21 hearing, Reyes requested that the Department of Defense delay its original March 26 deadline for instituting the policy.

The government filed a motion to dissolve the injunction on March 21 and argued that the policy is not an overarching ban on transgender-identifying people but rather “turns on gender dysphoria–a medical condition–and does not discriminate against trans-identifying persons as a class.”

The administration also asked that if the motion to dissolve is rejected, the court should stay the preliminary injunction pending appeal. It also cited new guidance issued on March 21 that clarified that “the phrase ‘exhibit symptoms consistent with gender dysphoria‘” only applies to “individuals who exhibit such symptoms as would be sufficient to constitute a diagnosis.’”

“Defendants re-emphasize their ‘consistent position that the [Pentagon] Policy is concerned with the military readiness, deployability, and costs associated with a medical condition,’” Reyes wrote.

“Regulating gender dysphoria is no different than regulating bipolar disorder, eating disorders, or suicidality. The Military Ban regulates a medical condition, they insist, not people. And therein lies the problem.

“Gender dysphoria is not like other medical conditions, something Defendants well know,” Reyes wrote. “It affects only one group of people: all persons with gender dysphoria are transgender, and only transgender persons experience gender dysphoria.”

Aldgra Fredly contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anaceciliareyes; anareyes; enemycombatant; j6; judgewatch; judicialoverreach; judicialsedition; noauthority; nostanding; sabotage; sedition; trans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2025 6:25:16 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ignore her stupid order.

Force Roberts to get off his dead ass.

L


2 posted on 03/27/2025 6:26:44 AM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

>“adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual’s sex conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle.”

Lol, great wording.


3 posted on 03/27/2025 6:27:38 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Renegade judges running the country.


4 posted on 03/27/2025 6:27:49 AM PDT by Old Yeller (On judgement day, you’ll wish you were biblically correctly, not politically correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“... thousands of transgender service members have sacrificed...”

Thousands???????????

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 03/27/2025 6:28:25 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Foreign born, lesbian Judge.


6 posted on 03/27/2025 6:28:33 AM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We have 700 presidents.


7 posted on 03/27/2025 6:29:16 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out here...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck, 1980, Reno, NV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Reject them for “Medically Dependent” and therefore not fit for Military service.


8 posted on 03/27/2025 6:30:43 AM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Commander In Chief is not allowed to Command says the lesbian , she/he/it is in Command


9 posted on 03/27/2025 6:30:48 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

IT’S TIME FOR A PRESIDENTAL ADDRESS.


10 posted on 03/27/2025 6:31:18 AM PDT by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There is no tranny ban. We should stop allowing the left to frame the argument.

There is a standing ban on medically dependent people serving in the military. For example, diabetics can’t serve.

All this does is remove the special exemption for transsexuals who use chronic medication, eg hormone shots, so they are treated the same as everyone else.


11 posted on 03/27/2025 6:32:36 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Time to dial (202) 224-3121 and tell the Congressional switchboard operator that you didn’t vote for these black-robed tyrants and if Congress doesn’t do something about them, this Congress will be replaced. These judges are blocking American citizens from their duly-elected representation


12 posted on 03/27/2025 6:32:57 AM PDT by liberalh8ter ( This tagline has taken the month off to attend the inauguration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Insurrection by judges ,arrest them all


13 posted on 03/27/2025 6:32:59 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

i would say is sissies want to join the Marines, let them be put to the REAL test, they’ll proably wished they had never sign up. Just don’t make any allowances for their pendages, their pronouns and make them FIT into the group in the fox hole and fight..fight..fight.. I think they’ll scram.


14 posted on 03/27/2025 6:33:33 AM PDT by rovenstinez (Wo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

15 posted on 03/27/2025 6:33:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

16 posted on 03/27/2025 6:33:57 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Abnormal/perverted sexual behavior is not an inherent quality; it is a choice that indicates mental problems. Mental instability is a detriment to the military. Any judge who thinks otherwise is an enemy of this country and should be removed from office.


17 posted on 03/27/2025 6:35:37 AM PDT by skr (1 Peter 1:15 - But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Personally I would inform the Judge of every potential terrorist attack and ask her to handle. Then when Americans are killed, I would hire attorneys for the surviving family members to sue that Judge.

I would call a press conference and announce that those dead are do to the Judge’s lack of ability and urgency to micro manage the military and she failed. This is what happens when our internal deep state plays their power plays, Americans get killed. Any questions ask the Judge! And walk away.

But that’s just me!

18 posted on 03/27/2025 6:35:43 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement at the time. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for," Roberts added.

THAT is where Roberts stands, and ONLY Alito and Thomas are Constitution followers on a consistent basis.

Thinking the USSC is impartial is silly.....look at what they HAVEN'T done in the past.

In THIS case, the Judge has no "Standing" or "Jurisdiction", whatsoever, for Military decisions OR preparedness.

19 posted on 03/27/2025 6:36:12 AM PDT by traditional2 ("Is it them, again, Yogi?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So a federal judge decides who can be in the military but not the Commander-in-Chief? This CANNOT stand.


20 posted on 03/27/2025 6:36:24 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson